FDX MAY Disputed Pairings
04-10-2007, 04:39 PM
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Originally Posted by TonyC
MacArthur-era C-rats should also have cigarettes, right? I'll give mine to somebody higher on the seniority list. 
.
.
04-10-2007, 06:04 PM
#13
Line Holder
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 57
Look fellas, I know you have been covering for some who like to fly disputed pairings. Here is the deal per contract: they cannot be assigned via vto unless asked for specifically and you cannot pick them up afterward unless you ask for them specifically.
Those who say they did not know are blind because they want to be. The disputed airings are given out in many different forums and many different ways. You fly then at your own rik and someone who has been with the company over 6 years (as some have been pinpointed) are bkind by choice or dont care about the process.
Get in the game. If it is listed, dont ask for it, that is all you have to do.
Those who say they did not know are blind because they want to be. The disputed airings are given out in many different forums and many different ways. You fly then at your own rik and someone who has been with the company over 6 years (as some have been pinpointed) are bkind by choice or dont care about the process.
Get in the game. If it is listed, dont ask for it, that is all you have to do.
04-10-2007, 07:43 PM
#15
...Whatever It Is!
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,680
Originally Posted by SC-7
I still do and I have a spare or two somewhere. Used to be a surplus store here that had a bowl of them by the cash register.
I think I can spare the 35 cents to mail a few, if you need one PM me with your address.
I think I can spare the 35 cents to mail a few, if you need one PM me with your address.
10 Military Boy Scout Survival P-38 Can Openers
04-10-2007, 07:46 PM
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 767 CA
Posts: 1,876
I can't imagine anyone intentionally picking up the Airbus SAN trip. It's hard enough to do an AM launch to SAN with a short layover. Now throw in a LBB stop on the way! But then again, it does pay 7:57 CH for a one day trip. Some fool will pick them up. 
04-10-2007, 08:01 PM
#18
Administrator
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: C-172
Posts: 8,024
Originally Posted by Balut
Hey now... No Baluts on the menu please
04-11-2007, 08:01 PM
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 675
Originally Posted by TonyC
You should have received by now an e-mail from the Scheduling Improvement Group - May 2007 is a 4-week month
The Bid is Open for May. There is no possibility that someone can, at this point, pick up a Disputed Pairing out of Open Time, or request one specifically on a Secondary Line. What else can we do at this point to prevent a pilot from "accidentally" picking up one of these pairings out of Open Time? We've debated what to do after a Pairing has been picked up -- but what can we do to prevent it before it even happens?
Is it even important? Well, the SIG seems to think so.
The A300 PSIT added this to the May SIG Letter:
Attachment 601
Does this help? Do you think it would be helpful if every PSIT did the same thing? I imagine the PSIT would appreciate feedback, either way.
And, as an aside, who is this Jim Skinner guy making up his own version of Scooby Snacks?!?!
.
The Bid is Open for May. There is no possibility that someone can, at this point, pick up a Disputed Pairing out of Open Time, or request one specifically on a Secondary Line. What else can we do at this point to prevent a pilot from "accidentally" picking up one of these pairings out of Open Time? We've debated what to do after a Pairing has been picked up -- but what can we do to prevent it before it even happens?
Is it even important? Well, the SIG seems to think so.
"Ladies and Gentlemen the ALPA SIG believes the disputed pairing process is our best means of fixing rigorous pairing designs, it requires the crew force to keep themselves informed and up to date!"
FlybyKnite made this observation:The A300 PSIT added this to the May SIG Letter:
Attachment 601
Does this help? Do you think it would be helpful if every PSIT did the same thing? I imagine the PSIT would appreciate feedback, either way.
And, as an aside, who is this Jim Skinner guy making up his own version of Scooby Snacks?!?!
"For the crews receiving mini snacks in SFS. Jim Skinner has found some local products that will meet the crew forces needs as they transit SFS. We had a few committee members taste test the SFS Scooby Snacks and they give 'a thumbs up'."
Where did he find these "products"? Do we want to know? .
04-17-2007, 01:32 PM
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: B777
Posts: 564
Step up and get your scorecard for May.
It is my hope that this list will help folks avoid asking for a disputed pairing in their preferences for their secondary line or as a conflict replacement. It's ordered by date/week.
#-#-#-#-#- DISPUTED PAIRING -#-#-#-#-#-
Trip 495 MEM 30 01MAY07, 02MAY07, 03MAY07, 04MAY07
Trip 495 MEM 30 08MAY07, 09MAY07, 10MAY07, 11MAY07
Trip 495 MEM 30 11MAY07
Trip 495 MEM 30 15MAY07, 16MAY07, 17MAY07, 18MAY07
Trip 495 MEM 30 22MAY07, 23MAY07, 24MAY07, 25MAY07
17 trips X 3 pilots = 51 pilot slots
#-#-#-#-#- DISPUTED PAIRING -#-#-#-#-#-
Trip 241 MEM 27 30APR07, 01MAY07, 02MAY07, 03MAY07
Trip 193 MEM 27 30APR07
Trip 107 MEM 27 07MAY07
Trip 242 MEM 27 07MAY07
Trip 243 MEM 27 08MAY07, 09MAY07, 10MAY07
Trip 108 MEM 27 14MAY07
Trip 242 MEM 27 14MAY07
Trip 192 MEM 27 14MAY07
Trip 243 MEM 27 15MAY07, 16MAY07, 17MAY07
Trip 108 MEM 27 21MAY07
Trip 242 MEM 27 21MAY07
Trip 192 MEM 27 21MAY07
Trip 243 MEM 27 22MAY07 23MAY07 24MAY07
22 trips X 2 pilots = 44 pilot slots
#-#-#-#-#- DISPUTED PAIRING -#-#-#-#-#-
Trip 125 ANC 11 01MAY07
Trip 192 ANC 11 21MAY07
Trip 165 ANC 11 23MAY07
3 trips X 2 pilots = 6 pilot slots
#-#-#-#-#- DISPUTED PAIRING -#-#-#-#-#-
ALPA's founders chose "Schedule with Safety" as their motto. Support the SIG/PSIT in upholding that standard-- Don't fly disputed pairings!
.
It is my hope that this list will help folks avoid asking for a disputed pairing in their preferences for their secondary line or as a conflict replacement. It's ordered by date/week.
#-#-#-#-#- DISPUTED PAIRING -#-#-#-#-#-
Trip 495 MEM 30 01MAY07, 02MAY07, 03MAY07, 04MAY07
Trip 495 MEM 30 08MAY07, 09MAY07, 10MAY07, 11MAY07
Trip 495 MEM 30 11MAY07
Trip 495 MEM 30 15MAY07, 16MAY07, 17MAY07, 18MAY07
Trip 495 MEM 30 22MAY07, 23MAY07, 24MAY07, 25MAY07
17 trips X 3 pilots = 51 pilot slots
#-#-#-#-#- DISPUTED PAIRING -#-#-#-#-#-
Trip 241 MEM 27 30APR07, 01MAY07, 02MAY07, 03MAY07
Trip 193 MEM 27 30APR07
Trip 107 MEM 27 07MAY07
Trip 242 MEM 27 07MAY07
Trip 243 MEM 27 08MAY07, 09MAY07, 10MAY07
Trip 108 MEM 27 14MAY07
Trip 242 MEM 27 14MAY07
Trip 192 MEM 27 14MAY07
Trip 243 MEM 27 15MAY07, 16MAY07, 17MAY07
Trip 108 MEM 27 21MAY07
Trip 242 MEM 27 21MAY07
Trip 192 MEM 27 21MAY07
Trip 243 MEM 27 22MAY07 23MAY07 24MAY07
22 trips X 2 pilots = 44 pilot slots
#-#-#-#-#- DISPUTED PAIRING -#-#-#-#-#-
Trip 125 ANC 11 01MAY07
Trip 192 ANC 11 21MAY07
Trip 165 ANC 11 23MAY07
3 trips X 2 pilots = 6 pilot slots
#-#-#-#-#- DISPUTED PAIRING -#-#-#-#-#-
ALPA's founders chose "Schedule with Safety" as their motto. Support the SIG/PSIT in upholding that standard-- Don't fly disputed pairings!
.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MD11Fr8Dog
Cargo
272
03-06-2007 12:51 PM
