Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Alpa Fdx

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-08-2007, 10:47 AM
  #211  
On Reserve
 
XUSair's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: A300 F/O
Posts: 18
Default

I propose an LOA to the contract and let the majority of the membership rule. I'm sick of ALPAs senior driven policies. At my last airline, I had furlough protection until the MEC feed me to the wolfs to protect senior pay. What did retiree health care cost us in this contract? Just throw a bone to the bottom dues paying members. The good of the few outweigh the good of the many in our union. It is past time for the majority to take control of our union. Call your reps, get involved, and "Lets take it back".

Last edited by XUSair; 05-08-2007 at 10:52 AM.
XUSair is offline  
Old 05-08-2007, 10:48 AM
  #212  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CaptainMark's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: FDX A300 CPT
Posts: 967
Default

...................................

Last edited by CaptainMark; 05-08-2007 at 11:00 AM.
CaptainMark is offline  
Old 05-08-2007, 10:49 AM
  #213  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Default

Originally Posted by FoxHunter View Post
They don't exercise those rights because the "Regulated Age is 60", the "Regulated Age" will soon be 65 and then there is no longer any restriction.
No kidding?

You're leaving out that it will be the "regulated age" for those under the age of 60 at the date of implementaion, or whatever the effective date will be called.

It's not a contractual limitation. It's a regulatory limitation. It really has nothing to do with the contract, or protecting anyone's seniority rights.

Last edited by Busboy; 05-08-2007 at 04:09 PM.
Busboy is offline  
Old 05-08-2007, 11:07 AM
  #214  
Gets Weekends Off
 
130JDrvr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 349
Default

Originally Posted by XUSair View Post
I propose an LOA to the contract and let the majority of the membership rule. I'm sick of ALPAs senior driven policies. At my last airline, I had furlough protection until the MEC feed me to the wolfs to protect senior pay. What did retiree health care cost us in this contract? Just throw a bone to the bottom dues paying members. The good of the few outweigh the good of the many in our union. It is past time for the majority to take control of our union. Call your reps, get involved, and "Lets take it back".
So what are you going to say when your senior? B!tch about what a good deal the junior guys have?

I have no issues with what we did with retiree health care. We'll all benefit from that in the future.

Past...
130JDrvr is offline  
Old 05-08-2007, 11:16 AM
  #215  
On Reserve
 
XUSair's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: A300 F/O
Posts: 18
Default

As you work until 65,we'll see how much.

Last edited by XUSair; 05-08-2007 at 11:24 AM.
XUSair is offline  
Old 05-08-2007, 11:21 AM
  #216  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FoxHunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: Retired
Posts: 980
Default

Originally Posted by Busboy View Post
No kidding?

You're leaving out that is will be the "regulated age" for those under the age of 60 at the date of implementaion, or whatever the effective date will be called.

It's not a contractual limitation. It's a regulatory limitation. It really has nothing to do with the contract, or protecting anyone's seniority rights.
Looks like the Senators that wrote the Bill don't see it that way. In any case it is now part of the FAA Reauthorization Bill. The FAA runs out of funds on September 30, 2007 if not passed.


http://www.age60rule.com/docs/2007%2...o%20Blakey.pdf
FoxHunter is offline  
Old 05-08-2007, 12:05 PM
  #217  
SNAFU
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

That is nothing that another continuing resolution won't solve.

Putz.
 
Old 05-08-2007, 12:06 PM
  #218  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: A300 Captain
Posts: 257
Default

Originally Posted by XUSair View Post
I propose an LOA to the contract and let the majority of the membership rule. I'm sick of ALPAs senior driven policies. At my last airline, I had furlough protection until the MEC feed me to the wolfs to protect senior pay. What did retiree health care cost us in this contract? Just throw a bone to the bottom dues paying members. The good of the few outweigh the good of the many in our union. It is past time for the majority to take control of our union. Call your reps, get involved, and "Lets take it back".
Not to pi$$ you off too much, but our representative system at fdx, which by the way was changed at ALPA level when we remerged is seniority based; so I ask where are the bottom half of the block reps in this equation. If in fact you have a ***** it's with them and until they explain their position
Bitme is offline  
Old 05-08-2007, 12:20 PM
  #219  
done, gone skiing
 
dckozak's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Rocking chair
Posts: 1,601
Default Age 60 and early retirement

Maybe this has been suggested somewhere in the last 200+ posts (can't be bothered to go threw them all ) What will happen to the early out provisions?? will they move forward 5 years, and if so when? If the retirement age ups to 65 and overnight so does the early retirement penalty than you won't have to worry about Foxhunter or anyone else (in the near term) hanging on for 5 years. Unless FedEx allows normal retirement for all that want to at 60, I think its only fair that if the retirement age increases and if the early retirement penalties increases correspondingly, than they should do so at the same time with no graduated provisions.
If the union leadership is listening, please don't attempt to negotiate any graduated provisions for early retirement. If the company can and will increase the age penalties will apply to an early out, they should do so without prejudice. If anyone wants to get out between 60+ to 65 they should take the same hit we all will.
dckozak is offline  
Old 05-08-2007, 12:25 PM
  #220  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FoxHunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: Retired
Posts: 980
Default

Originally Posted by dckozak View Post
Maybe this has been suggested somewhere in the last 200+ posts (can't be bothered to go threw them all ) What will happen to the early out provisions?? will they move forward 5 years, and if so when? If the retirement age ups to 65 and overnight so does the early retirement penalty than you won't have to worry about Foxhunter or anyone else (in the near term) hanging on for 5 years. Unless FedEx allows normal retirement for all that want to at 60, I think its only fair that if the retirement age increases and if the early retirement penalties increases correspondingly, than they should do so at the same time with no graduated provisions.
If the union leadership is listening, please don't attempt to negotiate any graduated provisions for early retirement. If the company can and will increase the age penalties will apply to an early out, they should do so without prejudice. If anyone wants to get out between 60+ to 65 they should take the same hit we all will.
Don, according to the MEC and the NC age 60 remains the normal retirement age. They both said that could only change with a new contract.
FoxHunter is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rjlavender
Major
26
10-19-2006 08:48 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
09-14-2005 09:52 PM
Diesel 10
Hangar Talk
4
07-20-2005 05:22 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices