View Poll Results: Hire an outside professional negotiating firm to help negotiate our next contract?
Yes
118
82.52%
No
25
17.48%
Voters: 143. You may not vote on this poll
FDX: Professional Negotiating Firm?? Poll
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
The problem is that we don't have $13.7 million per year to work with. That goes to ALPA national, who then decides how much goes back to the FDX MEC for our (their) purposes. Guess what... the FDX MEC budget for 2007 was some $4.2 million. So no, we don't have $5 or $6 million laying about to pay a professional negotiator.
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Ask the guys at Continental, or UAL, DAL, USAir what they think of ALPA's "help" or negotiating ability and I know you'll get a different tune today. A guy at DAL told me five days ago that if it wasn't an agency shop he'd NEVER give another dime to ALPA. When I went for my last physical I got into a discussion with a guy from Continental. He said ALPA couldn't negotiate a descent contract if it was handed to them. He was disgusted.
We need to get involved, take back our MEC, man up and show some measurable resolve next negotiations. Without that...it doesn't matter who's sitting on our side of the table.
#13
I don't think anybody thinks having negotiators alone will make for a better contract. The point is why do we re-invent the wheel every four years with a bunch of pilots that know zilch about negotiating with a Fortune 100 company? Have our token guy, ie. FE and get a few cut-throat lawyers like the company has and get it done. Crew resolve would be there if half the guys don't feel like they are getting hosed on a bad deal. And the company would not be as able to pull fast ones on us with their legaleeze that they use.
#14
Busboy,
I agree that we are a collective group of independent agents at times. A little less so during negotiations.
The point of a professional negotiator is that we, as stupid pilots, get outsmarted at every turn at the table. What appears to us as being solid strengthening in work rules, ends up leaking more than a colander full of pasta sitting in your grandmother's kitchen sink. We need people who are trained to screw other people. I'm tired of bending over.
I agree that we are a collective group of independent agents at times. A little less so during negotiations.
The point of a professional negotiator is that we, as stupid pilots, get outsmarted at every turn at the table. What appears to us as being solid strengthening in work rules, ends up leaking more than a colander full of pasta sitting in your grandmother's kitchen sink. We need people who are trained to screw other people. I'm tired of bending over.
#15
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Position: FO
Posts: 104
alpa does not negotiate the contract for us per se. We need to support whim ever negotiates our next contract. UAL, when they negotiate the contract of 2000 had a pilot negotiate it. He had a Masters in Labor Relations and was one heck of a negotiator. He also had a very unified pilot group. Goodwin the CEO was a bag of rocks. I beg to differ on the how unified the FedEx group was for the past negotiations. To have a necklace and a bunch of stickers say I support the Union is nice, but not picking up DP's is key. Action speaks the loudest. We are ALPA. A professional may do slightly better but we must be unified, no dp's and our leverage are the power levers. The World on Time does not happen without us!!! When it comes time for family awareness, spend the time at home. I would like to see a pro but he will need better support than stickers and necklaces...
H
H
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Drinking from the fire hose
Posts: 305
I've already said that I'm not against looking at an outside negotiator...I just don't want anyone to think that getting an outsider to negotiate for us, in itself, is the answer. It could just be another waste of money.
We need to get involved, take back our MEC, man up and show some measurable resolve next negotiations. Without that...it doesn't matter who's sitting on our side of the table.
We need to get involved, take back our MEC, man up and show some measurable resolve next negotiations. Without that...it doesn't matter who's sitting on our side of the table.
#18
This is a personality driven argument. People are rightly upset with the heavyhanded and autocratic style of DW and BC. But I can't see how a team of hired negotiators would do any better. First off, they would not be able to cut any deals on their own and would have to run everything through the prez and MEC, just like now. Who would tell them what company proposal was a bad idea and what was good....us. They would still need pilot experts in scheduling, safety, retirement, health care and all the other things important to us. What we need is a union president and MEC and NC chairman who listen and care what the crew force think. Had we had that the last few years, this discussion would be moot. The resources are there, we just need the right people. (BTW...I don't think DM has the grit required to replace DW when he finally goes....but there are a lot of good, smart guys who can replace him.....unless,of course, we want a "professional" union president too?)
#19
This:
I agree with. This:
is kind of like saying a good divorce lawyer isn't worth the money because he has to run everything through you first.
What we need is a union president and MEC and NC chairman who listen and care what the crew force think.
But I can't see how a team of hired negotiators would do any better. First off, they would not be able to cut any deals on their own and would have to run everything through the prez and MEC, just like now.
#20
Wake up and smell the coffee
This thread would be hilarious if it wasn't for the fact that your (as in the collective) opinion does have an affect (on current and future) FDX ALPA leadership. Even more ominously, it is surely read (and no doubt, laughed at) by the very people we have to negotiate against.
Our problem is not lack of (leadership) interest in improving our work conditions and pay; DW and all on the MEC stand to benefit, as do you, by better pay and improved sch/scope/etc. The problem isn't even lack of (proven) resolve by the membership. The problem is the inability to even get to a position to squeeze the company and make them see the benefit of agreeing to our terms. We might fail collectively to "pull the trigger" in a self help situation but unless the NMB will let us out of mediation, we are forced to sit and plead with the company to offer us better terms. ALPA is not the problem in negotiating nor was BC, the problem was political leadership in Washington that is unabashedly anti labor. We could have held out for more, and in all likelihood, would still be waiting for (any) improvements, or a pay raise, since the first contract.
If you think ALPA is the root of all our problems, go on ahead and delude yourself. Age 65, our contract, even our hated LOA, are all the result of the (national) political power we don't have and management does. Keep that in mind as you consider your vote 10 months from now.
Our problem is not lack of (leadership) interest in improving our work conditions and pay; DW and all on the MEC stand to benefit, as do you, by better pay and improved sch/scope/etc. The problem isn't even lack of (proven) resolve by the membership. The problem is the inability to even get to a position to squeeze the company and make them see the benefit of agreeing to our terms. We might fail collectively to "pull the trigger" in a self help situation but unless the NMB will let us out of mediation, we are forced to sit and plead with the company to offer us better terms. ALPA is not the problem in negotiating nor was BC, the problem was political leadership in Washington that is unabashedly anti labor. We could have held out for more, and in all likelihood, would still be waiting for (any) improvements, or a pay raise, since the first contract.
If you think ALPA is the root of all our problems, go on ahead and delude yourself. Age 65, our contract, even our hated LOA, are all the result of the (national) political power we don't have and management does. Keep that in mind as you consider your vote 10 months from now.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post