Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
fdx anc dp 83/26apr true cost >

fdx anc dp 83/26apr true cost

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

fdx anc dp 83/26apr true cost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-03-2008, 01:32 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
vschip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 11C
Posts: 149
Default fdx anc dp 83/26apr true cost

While waiting for the Kentucky Derby to start, did some figuring on ANC dp 83/26Apr. The capt flew the whole pairing(on reserve, good on ya), while the f/o portion was divided up into 3 different pairings, ANC 2115/26Apr, the disputed part, assigned on reserve(good on ya), LAX 2064/26Apr, and ANC2116/29Apr. If the trip had flown as scheduled, the cost to the company would have been approx $15926(I assumed 10 yr wb capt and 5 yr wb f/o for pay). Here’s what it actually cost the company to get the flights filled:

ANC2115/26apr: pay $5367(40:19hrs), dh bank $4246 = $9613
LAX2064/26apr: pay $6353(47:45), dh bank $11036 = $17389
ANC2116/29apr: pay $5594(40:01), dh bank $6147 = $11741
Total $38743-9813(original capt’s pay) =$28930(not including some extra hotel rooms, override, and something else I’m sure I’m forgetting).

Now, you could argue that 2 of the f/o slots were assigned to reserve pilots, which is true, but there is still a dh cost to complete the flights of $21429. To a billion dollar company, it probably doesn’t seem like a whole lot of money, but with 15 dp’s in ANC in May, it could add up. If we could get guys not to fly these things(just like the ANC guys/gals are doing now), and the cost to the company goes up to fill them, maybe, just maybe we could give the psit some pull that would enable them to have some teeth in regards to improving our pairings.
ps, not an accounting major, so there are probably some math mistakes, feel free to point them out.
vschip is offline  
Old 05-03-2008, 04:35 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 1,395
Default

It's not about the money....it's not about safety....it's not about fatigue....it's all about CONTROL!
FDXer is offline  
Old 05-03-2008, 06:33 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Oh, it is definitely about the money.

If this continues, change will occur. They just think they can outlast us.
Gunter is offline  
Old 05-03-2008, 07:02 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Retired
Posts: 3,717
Default

I agree with FDXer, it's all about the control. It is NOT about the money, and they CAN outlast us.
Jetjok is offline  
Old 05-03-2008, 07:11 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: MD-11
Posts: 395
Default

Originally Posted by vschip View Post
While waiting for the Kentucky Derby to start, did some figuring on ANC dp 83/26Apr. The capt flew the whole pairing(on reserve, good on ya), while the f/o portion was divided up into 3 different pairings, ANC 2115/26Apr, the disputed part, assigned on reserve(good on ya), LAX 2064/26Apr, and ANC2116/29Apr. If the trip had flown as scheduled, the cost to the company would have been approx $15926(I assumed 10 yr wb capt and 5 yr wb f/o for pay). Here’s what it actually cost the company to get the flights filled:

ANC2115/26apr: pay $5367(40:19hrs), dh bank $4246 = $9613
LAX2064/26apr: pay $6353(47:45), dh bank $11036 = $17389
ANC2116/29apr: pay $5594(40:01), dh bank $6147 = $11741
Total $38743-9813(original capt’s pay) =$28930(not including some extra hotel rooms, override, and something else I’m sure I’m forgetting).


Now, you could argue that 2 of the f/o slots were assigned to reserve pilots, which is true, but there is still a dh cost to complete the flights of $21429. To a billion dollar company, it probably doesn’t seem like a whole lot of money, but with 15 dp’s in ANC in May, it could add up. If we could get guys not to fly these things(just like the ANC guys/gals are doing now), and the cost to the company goes up to fill them, maybe, just maybe we could give the psit some pull that would enable them to have some teeth in regards to improving our pairings.
ps, not an accounting major, so there are probably some math mistakes, feel free to point them out.
Now this is the kind of work our "union" could be doing to enhance our quality of life while saving the company money! BZ to VSCHIP. Isn't this kind of effort potentially more rewarding than deciding on which baffoon to endorse for President?
PicklePausePull is offline  
Old 05-04-2008, 03:03 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

If this pairing, or even this type of pairing, continues to cost out more than it would if less optimized, it will be changed.

Let's not give up designating onerous pairings as DPs.
Gunter is offline  
Old 05-04-2008, 06:40 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lifizgud's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Re-reading George Orwell's 'Animal Farm' and getting scared...
Posts: 276
Default

Now if we could just get the MEM guys to act more like those in ANC...
Lifizgud is offline  
Old 05-04-2008, 10:54 AM
  #8  
...Whatever It Is!
 
MD11Fr8Dog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,680
Default

Originally Posted by Jetjok View Post
I agree with FDXer, it's all about the control. It is NOT about the money, and they CAN outlast us.

Yep, they've always been willing to spend 10 cents to keep from paying you 5 cents!
MD11Fr8Dog is offline  
Old 05-04-2008, 11:03 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,227
Default

Now if we could just get the MEM guys to act more like those in ANC...
Reminds me of a flight I did Osaka - Memphis back during the summer of Love when we got our contract.

I was RFO # 2 and met the crew for the first time in the Swissotel lobby. As we got in the van, the captain (an Anchorage guy) said, "So when are you Memphis a##holes going to quit flying DP's?" I ignored him, while silently commending him on his stellar CRM.

We got to the plane, and when I did the walk-around I found a massive oil leak on the # 3 engine. We took a 4 hour delay while they fixed it - this before starting a 15-hour duty day.

Captain grumbled at me, "You know, you could have kept the oil leak to yourself...." Ahh... tell me again the superiority of the Anchorage breed....
Huck is offline  
Old 05-04-2008, 04:06 PM
  #10  
Gets Off
 
md11phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Nordskog Industries Field Technician
Posts: 688
Default

Originally Posted by Huck View Post
Reminds me of a flight I did Osaka - Memphis back during the summer of Love when we got our contract.

I was RFO # 2 and met the crew for the first time in the Swissotel lobby. As we got in the van, the captain (an Anchorage guy) said, "So when are you Memphis a##holes going to quit flying DP's?" I ignored him, while silently commending him on his stellar CRM.

We got to the plane, and when I did the walk-around I found a massive oil leak on the # 3 engine. We took a 4 hour delay while they fixed it - this before starting a 15-hour duty day.

Captain grumbled at me, "You know, you could have kept the oil leak to yourself...." Ahh... tell me again the superiority of the Anchorage breed....
You guys aren't all *********s. You're just not very interesting.
md11phlyer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Old Herk GUy
Cargo
21
04-05-2008 08:52 PM
2cylinderdriver
Cargo
186
04-02-2008 12:32 PM
jagplt
Cargo
12
03-15-2008 07:01 AM
IPAMD11FO
Cargo
78
03-14-2008 03:45 PM
md11phlyer
Cargo
1
02-28-2008 08:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices