Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
380 vs 777 vs displacement pay protection >

380 vs 777 vs displacement pay protection

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

380 vs 777 vs displacement pay protection

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-11-2009, 12:40 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
FedElta's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Retired, again...
Posts: 608
Default 380 vs 777 vs displacement pay protection

Hi Guys,
I saw a couple of Emirates a380's at JFK and got to wondering.....If FDX cancelled the 380 buy due to delays, would the slump/ rebound cycle make that A/C available around the time lift would be required again?

Could the 777 be written in disappearing ink for the 380 to arise from the ashes.....just wondering.

Part 2: My present employer just issued a system wide bid/ displacement for pre-merger pilots. No furloughs, but a loss of higher seats for lower seats. A lot like FDX, except there is pay protection for 36 months........a provision like that would sure soften the blow @ any carrier suffering displacements to get guys in the "correct seat".

Training costs and pay protection will also slow down the bean counter's inclination to take such steps. Might be worth asking the LEC/MEC about for next negotiations.

Good luck and best regards,
BG
FedElta is offline  
Old 01-11-2009, 02:09 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

FedElta,

You obviously had a long career at FDX. I have had only a short one, but I think I have picked up on the current way of doing business. Don't forget we are the company that ran a useless excess bid in the 727 SO seat just to get 50 back up front (JL?) and displaced some junior 727 CAs to FO seats. There were even complaints about how some of these junior CAs 'gamed the system' to work HKG CA passover pay out of that bid or the one before it. No empathy at all for the loss of seat due to a quasi legal bid.

I've seen pay protections used elsewhere but can't see it used here. They just don't think that way.

Last edited by Gunter; 01-11-2009 at 03:04 PM.
Gunter is offline  
Old 01-11-2009, 06:10 PM
  #3  
Ref +8
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: North by Midwest
Posts: 383
Default

Good questions, I still fail to see how you justify the A380 when they dumped the 747 because of fleet age and the claim they not filled to capacity. You would think they would stick with the 777 or maybe some second hand 747s being they are readily available. But my opinion is proof I am new to FedEx.
flywithjohn is offline  
Old 01-11-2009, 09:32 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
42GO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: MD-11 Capt
Posts: 330
Default

Fedex WILL NOT get any 747's. This is a long beat up item that the company will not use them because of loading issues. Said and done.
42GO is offline  
Old 01-11-2009, 09:44 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,333
Default

Originally Posted by 42GO View Post
Fedex WILL NOT get any 747's. This is a long beat up item that the company will not use them because of loading issues. Said and done.
I heard they considered to bring 747s back but now that UPS got them, they'll never look at 747s again...
⌐ AV8OR WANNABE is offline  
Old 01-12-2009, 04:25 AM
  #6  
Part Time Employee
 
MaxKts's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Dispersing Green House Gasses on a Global Basis
Posts: 1,918
Default

Originally Posted by ⌐ AV8OR WANNABE View Post
I heard they considered to bring 747s back but now that UPS got them, they'll never look at 747s again...
Yeah - just like we are selling all of our MD11's because you guys have them

That is why we created the MD10 - no one else has them and no one ever will
MaxKts is offline  
Old 01-12-2009, 05:33 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
trashhauler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: B-777
Posts: 455
Default

Originally Posted by FedElta View Post
Hi Guys,
I saw a couple of Emirates a380's at JFK and got to wondering.....If FDX cancelled the 380 buy due to delays, would the slump/ rebound cycle make that A/C available around the time lift would be required again?

Could the 777 be written in disappearing ink for the 380 to arise from the ashes.....just wondering.

Part 2: My present employer just issued a system wide bid/ displacement for pre-merger pilots. No furloughs, but a loss of higher seats for lower seats. A lot like FDX, except there is pay protection for 36 months........a provision like that would sure soften the blow @ any carrier suffering displacements to get guys in the "correct seat".

Training costs and pay protection will also slow down the bean counter's inclination to take such steps. Might be worth asking the LEC/MEC about for next negotiations.

Good luck and best regards,
BG
As far as I know, Airbus has delayed the freighter version of the A-380 until the middle of next decade. It may never be built.
trashhauler is offline  
Old 01-12-2009, 09:22 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 221
Default

Last time I checked they were still building that massive hangar next to 27. 777 tail aint that tall.
purpledog is offline  
Old 01-12-2009, 09:50 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: 767 Cap
Posts: 1,306
Default

Originally Posted by purpledog View Post
Last time I checked they were still building that massive hangar next to 27. 777 tail aint that tall.

Yeah, but IMHO that's more about not 1. Cancelling a construction contract that was already started (big bucks,) 2. Getting an architectural firm to redesign a building that's more right-sized for 777s (more big bucks,) and 3. a delay of a year or two to get the new design built, when 777s will be on the property this fall. You'll rarely hear maintenance complain about a hanger that's a little too big.
fdx727pilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
captain_drew
Flight Schools and Training
38
12-05-2012 08:29 AM
whtever
Regional
109
12-15-2008 09:12 PM
Piloto Noche
Cargo
184
10-17-2008 04:06 PM
HazCan
Cargo
84
10-11-2008 07:27 PM
Scoop
Mergers and Acquisitions
4
10-02-2008 09:45 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices