Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FDX - Jul Disputed PR's >

FDX - Jul Disputed PR's

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX - Jul Disputed PR's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-09-2009 | 07:48 AM
  #81  
Gunter's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by golfandfly

On a different front, the company decided this month to chop up the reserve lines into small blocks. I guess they don't like to pay 1 in 7. This also makes if very difficult for commuters. They have had several longer trips come up into open time late at night that they have needed to split up to get a reserve to fly it. This adds deadheads to at least two pairings which cost money. Again, it seems like they are spending dollars to save nickels....
They are probably learning right now that military leave drops are foiling the small blocks of R days idea....I hope those guys keep up the good work.

We have a scheduling process defined in the CBA to enhance safety (DPs). It is administered by folks picked and supported by the MEC. This is the ONLY mechanism we (FedEx Corp) have to ensure fatigue doesn't impact the safety of our operation. To have it totally undermined by these one ways in a habitual fashion says only one thing to me. They aren't one of us, they are independent contractors working their own deals. They are ONLY interested in what works for them. It's easy to treat them like non-members, they act like it.

Last edited by Gunter; 07-09-2009 at 08:11 AM.
Reply
Old 07-09-2009 | 08:17 AM
  #82  
MaydayMark's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,304
Likes: 0
From: MD-11 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by golfandfly

On a different front, the company decided this month to chop up the reserve lines into small blocks. I guess they don't like to pay 1 in 7. This also makes if very difficult for commuters. They have had several longer trips come up into open time late at night that they have needed to split up to get a reserve to fly it. This adds deadheads to at least two pairings which cost money. Again, it seems like they are spending dollars to save nickels....


I'm OK with the small blocks of R days (in fact, I sometimes bid them) but my reserve line is worse than that this month ...

- One block ended on July 3rd so I couldn't j/s home that evening (no flights 7/4)

- Next block ends on a Saturday night so I can't j/s home that evening (no Sunday am flight anymore).

I have put in dozens of R day drop/move requests this months trying to fix my commuting problem. ALL denied for insufficient reserves (so much for overmanning?).

So ... not only am I getting 4.a.2.b'd but I'm having to spend extra days in MEM because of commuting problems.

It must be part of the new management philosophy, "We're not happy until you're not happy."
Reply
Old 07-09-2009 | 08:27 AM
  #83  
BOYCAPTAIN's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
Default

i will put in a call for extra flights as long as you bring cookies!
Reply
Old 07-09-2009 | 08:27 AM
  #84  
onetime's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
From: 777 F/O
Default

Originally Posted by Gunter
They are probably learning right now that military leave drops are foiling the small blocks of R days idea....I hope those guys keep up the good work.

We have a scheduling process defined in the CBA to enhance safety (DPs). It is administered by folks picked and supported by the MEC. This is the ONLY mechanism we (FedEx Corp) have to ensure fatigue doesn't impact the safety of our operation. To have it totally undermined by these one ways in a habitual fashion says only one thing to me. They aren't one of us, they are independent contractors working their own deals. They are ONLY interested in what works for them. It's easy to treat them like non-members, they act like it.
All true G. Though if you read the SIG notes for July, there is no mention of safety like normal, only "rest on your time off" and "inability to turn into or out of." Which is again why I think we will lose this battle regardless on whether they are flown by the independent contractors or not.
Reply
Old 07-09-2009 | 08:44 AM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,047
Likes: 0
From: 767 FO
Default

Originally Posted by onetime
All true G. Though if you read the SIG notes for July, there is no mention of safety like normal, only "rest on your time off" and "inability to turn into or out of." Which is again why I think we will lose this battle regardless on whether they are flown by the independent contractors or not.
So your solution is to surrender?

There is a cost to the company. May not be big enough in our current climate to effect any change; but that is no reason to give up our only contractual method to improve pairings. Hard parameters are a great idea, we have hard parameters now and they aren't going to get better anytime soon. The more we allow the current pairings to degrade, the more it will cost us to improve the hard parameters in the next contract.
Reply
Old 07-09-2009 | 09:38 AM
  #86  
fedupbusdriver's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 0
From: A300/310 Capt
Default

I'm sure that if we ask really, really nicely, the company will change the hard parameters to a level that we can live without the SIG watching our backs....
Reply
Old 07-09-2009 | 09:53 AM
  #87  
onetime's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
From: 777 F/O
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG
So your solution is to surrender?

There is a cost to the company. May not be big enough in our current climate to effect any change; but that is no reason to give up our only contractual method to improve pairings. Hard parameters are a great idea, we have hard parameters now and they aren't going to get better anytime soon. The more we allow the current pairings to degrade, the more it will cost us to improve the hard parameters in the next contract.
No retreat, no surrender! I say we get guys/gals to stop flying them. How do you propose we do that, because the things we've tried up to now have not worked or we would not be having this discussion. I'm just being a realist.

Our hard parameters will not get any better, at least until the next contract and it would appear that our soft parameters are'nt getting any better either. It might be a better idea to spend our time sending the NC our ideas of how to fix this system that obviously does not work in our independent contractor environment. And in July we can't even play the "safety" card, at least on the MD-11 DPs. Only that we can't turn with these trips and have to rest on our time off.
Reply
Old 07-09-2009 | 10:50 AM
  #88  
Gunter's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MaydayMark
I have put in dozens of R day drop/move requests this months trying to fix my commuting problem. ALL denied for insufficient reserves (so much for overmanning?).

So ... not only am I getting 4.a.2.b'd but I'm having to spend extra days in MEM because of commuting problems.

It must be part of the new management philosophy, "We're not happy until you're not happy."
Can't be MayDay. "O" says folks are able to move and drop. And the Optimizer is a myth too. Those >8 hr pairings and shorter and shorter layovers are a figment of our imaginations.

BTW, the shorter blocks are to make up for the drop of the one R day per month. They also count a day dropped for some of our buffers as the drop too. You didn't actually think they were going to give us a free day, did you? At least the flexes got their 2 days off. Good for them.

We are being asked to ignore the man behind the Green curtain. "O" must be in on the misinformation campaign on some level.

He can't really believe it all, right?

Last edited by Gunter; 07-09-2009 at 11:03 AM.
Reply
Old 07-09-2009 | 12:12 PM
  #89  
kronan's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,424
Likes: 0
From: 757 Capt
Default

Keep in mind that the SIG is locked out of the line construction phase of building the bid month, not the building the pairing phase.

SIG is still involved in trying to apply some common sense to the pairings constructed by the company. They just don't win as much as they should.
Reply
Old 07-09-2009 | 01:38 PM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
From: Mad Dog Capt
Default

Originally Posted by onetime
All true G. Though if you read the SIG notes for July, there is no mention of safety like normal, only "rest on your time off" and "inability to turn into or out of." Which is again why I think we will lose this battle regardless on whether they are flown by the independent contractors or not.
The company now writes the SIG notes too.

Notice how they all sound very similar now, regardless of equipment or base?

The SIG/PSIT members might be writing like mad, but the end result sure looks like whitewash if you look real close.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Laughing_Jakal
Cargo
90
04-11-2010 05:15 AM
CaptMidnight
Cargo
52
04-26-2009 05:49 PM
1st overnite
Cargo
92
04-03-2009 01:44 PM
Rambler
Cargo
8
03-12-2009 06:59 AM
grant123
Cargo
14
09-18-2008 09:31 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices