Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
UPS A Plea for Civility >

UPS A Plea for Civility

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

UPS A Plea for Civility

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-12-2010 | 03:41 PM
  #31  
jungle's Avatar
Thread Starter
With The Resistance
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,191
Likes: 0
From: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Default

Originally Posted by MeXC
>>Violence has always been the least effective long term method of changing anyones mind, but it has always been viewed as handy, because reason was always in such short supply.<<

Violence or it's polar opposite has always been the only method to change someone's mind.
Reason is by far the most effective way over the long term, it is also the most difficult and it requires reasonable people on both sides to bring it off.
This may be impossible if the the subject is unreasonable to start with, as are so many of man's quests.
Reply
Old 09-12-2010 | 03:53 PM
  #32  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by jungle
Violence has always been the least effective long term method of changing anyones mind, but it has always been viewed as handy, because reason was always in such short supply.
I remember the interview with Bin Laden after 9-11 where he said: "you will be defeated because you love life. We however, love death - and that is the difference between us."

How does one "reason" with that? Perhaps all those that have tried thus far lacked your ability to reason.

Originally Posted by jungle
Plowshares may be beaten back into swords, but no amount of hammering makes the senseless sensible.
Violence against the peaceful is senseless. Defense against violence is not only sensible, it is virtuous.

You appear to be one of those folks that like very much to be free, but would accept subjugation if it meant no violence. I've never understood that. I hope the peace you seek is worth the price you may have to pay.

Carl
Reply
Old 09-12-2010 | 04:10 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,047
Likes: 0
From: 767 FO
Default

Originally Posted by jungle
...

Violence has always been the least effective long term method of changing anyones mind, but it has always been viewed as handy, because reason was always in such short supply. Plowshares may be beaten back into swords, but no amount of hammering makes the senseless sensible.
Reminds me of an old Air Force ACSC question (pre gulf war). Something like "When has air power/strategic bombing ever one/ended a war? Of course the politically correct answer was never; but I could never get anyone to tell me why WW II Pacific theater was not correct. Of course the Air Corpse (In deference to the CIC) could not have done it alone but it is hard to argue that Strategic Bombing didnt end that war (IMHO). Back to the subject. Reasoning worked well with the Nazis, especially after a boot applied to throat improved their ability to listen.
Reply
Old 09-12-2010 | 04:21 PM
  #34  
jungle's Avatar
Thread Starter
With The Resistance
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,191
Likes: 0
From: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Violence against the peaceful is senseless. Defense against violence is not only sensible, it is virtuous.

You appear to be one of those folks that like very much to be free, but would accept subjugation if it meant no violence. I've never understood that. I hope the peace you seek is worth the price you may have to pay.

Carl
You have missed my point entirely. My point is that subjugation is always a mistake and will always be met with violence and should be, and we often wear blinders to many forms of subjugation.

I will never seek peace over any sort of subjugation.

Since you seem to be be hung up on Jihad as a metaphor, just substitute crusade or conflict based on belief or any of a dozen other words. I think you can agree there is a large scale worldwide conflict based on ideas and beliefs, this is nothing new. Many of these conflicts involve resistance to subjugation in one form or another. Most of them have much more at stake than the outcome of a small struggle by fanatics. It doesn't make good news footage, but somehow people burning books on philosophy does.

Last edited by jungle; 09-12-2010 at 04:41 PM.
Reply
Old 09-12-2010 | 04:26 PM
  #35  
jungle's Avatar
Thread Starter
With The Resistance
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,191
Likes: 0
From: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG
Reminds me of an old Air Force ACSC question (pre gulf war). Something like "When has air power/strategic bombing ever one/ended a war? Of course the politically correct answer was never; but I could never get anyone to tell me why WW II Pacific theater was not correct. Of course the Air Corpse (In deference to the CIC) could not have done it alone but it is hard to argue that Strategic Bombing didnt end that war (IMHO). Back to the subject. Reasoning worked well with the Nazis, especially after a boot applied to throat improved their ability to listen.
You might also say that violence and subjugation worked out poorly for the Germans and Japanese and Italians. Not much reason going on in fascist dictatorships.
Reply
Old 09-12-2010 | 04:40 PM
  #36  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by jungle
You have missed my point entirely. My point is that subjugation is always a mistake and will always be met with violence and should be, and we often wear blinders to many forms of subjugation.

I will never seek peace over any sort of subjugation.
Excellent. If that was your point all along, then we agree. But maybe you can understand my confusion by your initial post quoting someone like Tom Robbins, and then saying this:

Originally Posted by jungle
Just a comment on the current times. Times that have the world going Jihad and burning the books of one another...
The world is not "going" jihad becasue that would infer that the jihad is reciprocal. The world is having jihad perpetrated upon it. I'm pleased to hear you're not one of those who would seek peace over subjugation. I could just choke people like that.

Carl
Reply
Old 09-12-2010 | 04:52 PM
  #37  
jungle's Avatar
Thread Starter
With The Resistance
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,191
Likes: 0
From: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Excellent. If that was your point all along, then we agree. But maybe you can understand my confusion by your initial post quoting someone like Tom Robbins, and then saying this:



The world is not "going" jihad becasue that would infer that the jihad is reciprocal. The world is having jihad perpetrated upon it. I'm pleased to hear you're not one of those who would seek peace over subjugation. I could just choke people like that.

Carl
Since you don't like the meataphor of Jihad, let's call it a conflict of ideas and beliefs and you can bet your last dollar it is both reciprocal and directed toward subjugation. Again this has nothing to do with islam, it is far more reaching and far more dangerous. The outcome is going to roll back progress or allow it to continue. It has happened before, and it will happen again.
We often use the trite phrase "never again", but that doesn't seem to have much effect.
Reply
Old 09-12-2010 | 05:10 PM
  #38  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by jungle
Since you don't like the meataphor of Jihad, let's call it a conflict of ideas and beliefs and you can bet your last dollar it is both reciprocal and directed toward subjugation.
The ideas and beliefs of our enemy are geared toward subjugation. Our response is absolutely not reciprocal or morally equivalent in any way. To the extent our nation has responded with violence, I'm reminded of the general that is often quoted by Colin Powell: "The only land we have ever taken from one of our vanquished enemies, is that land required to bury our dead."

Our ideas and beliefs do not include slaughtering the peaceful. We are not subjugators. You are simply mistaken when you conflate the ideas and beliefs or our nation with those of our enemy. If I didn't know you were an airline pilot, I would think you were a lifelong academic - the kind that refer to themselves as "intellectuals."

Carl
Reply
Old 09-12-2010 | 05:27 PM
  #39  
jungle's Avatar
Thread Starter
With The Resistance
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,191
Likes: 0
From: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
The ideas and beliefs of our enemy are geared toward subjugation. Our response is absolutely not reciprocal or morally equivalent in any way. To the extent our nation has responded with violence, I'm reminded of the general that is often quoted by Colin Powell: "The only land we have ever taken from one of our vanquished enemies, is that land required to bury our dead."

Our ideas and beliefs do not include slaughtering the peaceful. We are not subjugators. You are simply mistaken when you conflate the ideas and beliefs or our nation with those of our enemy. If I didn't know you were an airline pilot, I would think you were a lifelong academic - the kind that refer to themselves as "intellectuals."

Carl
Still missing the point, bureaucrats have done a far better job of subjugating the great mass of people around the world than any enemy or any army, this has been largely welcomed. We have been our own worst enemy. Not a shot has been fired. Much has been surrendered.

You are confusing the sideshow war with the real struggle. My objections are not directed at war, but at surrender.
Reply
Old 09-12-2010 | 05:31 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: Fero's
Default

Originally Posted by jungle
You are confusing the sideshow war with the real struggle. My objections are not directed at war, but at surrender.
The road to serfdom?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SLPII
Cargo
240
02-08-2017 10:25 PM
JustUnderPar
Cargo
832
08-13-2010 05:43 PM
757mech
Cargo
24
06-07-2010 07:34 PM
jungle
Cargo
0
12-10-2008 06:55 AM
FR8K9
Cargo
12
10-06-2008 05:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices