Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Fdx Idiots...enough!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-13-2006, 10:31 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
CaptainMark's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: FDX A300 CPT
Posts: 967
Default Fdx Idiots...enough!

ENOUGH ALREADY!!!!....just ran into some BOZO who says we should vote this thing down to send a message....what message? that we r 2 stupid to approve a good deal...what an idiot!
CaptainMark is offline  
Old 09-13-2006, 10:37 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RedeyeAV8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Default

Originally Posted by CaptainMark View Post
ENOUGH ALREADY!!!!....just ran into some BOZO who says we should vote this thing down to send a message....what message? that we r 2 stupid to approve a good deal...what an idiot!

Mark

Not defending ignorance but it is a democracy. Guys can vote No if they want for what ever reason they want.

Surely you don't expect this thing is going to PASS with a 100% thumbs up.
RedeyeAV8r is offline  
Old 09-13-2006, 10:41 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
CaptainMark's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: FDX A300 CPT
Posts: 967
Default

absolutely not...but they have no facts and spout out a bunch of crap...like" i am not paying tax on all my deadheading..that's bull..i'm voting it down"....didn't read the contract and no idea of what he is talking about...i can understand there can be valid reasons for wanting to vote no ..but jeeshh

Last edited by CaptainMark; 09-13-2006 at 10:45 AM.
CaptainMark is offline  
Old 09-13-2006, 10:42 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Default

Originally Posted by CaptainMark View Post
ENOUGH ALREADY!!!!....just ran into some BOZO who says we should vote this thing down to send a message....what message? that we r 2 stupid to approve a good deal...what an idiot!
Did his name begin with M, and end with 4?
Busboy is offline  
Old 09-13-2006, 10:49 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Default

I think an ideal democracy would require every voter to pass a knowledge test prior to receiving a ballot for any election.

And, I get to grade it!!
Busboy is offline  
Old 09-13-2006, 10:55 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RedeyeAV8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by CaptainMark View Post
absolutely not...but they have no facts and spout out a bunch of crap...like" i am not paying tax on all my deadheading..that's bull..i'm voting it down"....didn't read the contract and no idea of what he is talking about...i can understand there can be valid reasons for wanting to vote no ..but jeeshh
Agreed........but alot of this is emotionalism.

In past roadshows and Rallies the Association puts out the War cry and beats the drums to get everyones emotions high. That is part of the game, to get people interested and involved......................

As smoke from the battle clears, there are always a few casualties though they are minor. Emotion is always high at the end of contract negotiations. I've been through more negotiations than I care to remember.

There were NO voters at UAL and DAL when they landed those BIG contracts in 2000. There are always ONE issue voters who feel they were shorted. That is the way it is.............just like in Presidentail elections, One issue folks.........Pro life or Pro choice, nothing else matters to them.

Quite Frankly the company doesn't want this to pass with more than 50% plus 1.........................so quite possibly we won't disappoint them by too much. We'll have to wait and see.

Last edited by RedeyeAV8r; 09-13-2006 at 11:01 AM.
RedeyeAV8r is offline  
Old 09-13-2006, 11:01 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
niteFly84's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: B777 Captain
Posts: 123
Default

Amen. These are the same people who were unwavering in their support for the neg. committee until they produced this TA. Now suddenly, it's Chimenti's personal TA. I for one trust these guys now when they tell me it's a good deal. I am reading it for myself and am waiting for the pilot proof summary to show up in the mail. I am also truly amazed that this came without any red letters, media bashing, threat DVD's, etc. I would never have predicted that FWS would do this without a fight to show the other 200k employees that UNION = BAD NEWS. I think the most profound responses i've seen here are those that reflect on what happens if this is voted down.. We lose all credibility not only with mgt and the NMB but also with our MEC and the neg committee...
niteFly84 is offline  
Old 09-13-2006, 11:02 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
jdec141's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: MD11 Capt
Posts: 152
Default

Originally Posted by RedeyeAV8r View Post
Quite Frankly the company doesn't want this to pass with more than 50% plus 1.........................so quite possibly we won't disappoint them by too much.
I keep hearing this every so often(51%). Why wouldn't it send the message of "My Negotiating Committee Speaks for Me" if we pass this at 100% and then with immediate individual resolve on Nov 1, 2010 get things moving next time?
jdec141 is offline  
Old 09-13-2006, 11:20 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RedeyeAV8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Default

Originally Posted by jdec141 View Post
I keep hearing this every so often(51%). Why wouldn't it send the message of "My Negotiating Committee Speaks for Me" if we pass this at 100% and then with immediate individual resolve on Nov 1, 2010 get things moving next time?
It would.............My point was the Company doesn't want this to pass by much more than 50% +1.

As far the NC goes, I doubt they really care too much about the total vote...........as long as it passes.

If it fails to be ratified that would be a different story, I would expect that the NC would resign and maybe a few MEC members.
RedeyeAV8r is offline  
Old 09-13-2006, 11:22 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RedeyeAV8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Default

[QUOTE=jdec141;60448]I keep hearing this every so often(51%). Why wouldn't it send the message of "My Negotiating Committee Speaks for Me" if we pass this at 100% and then with immediate individual resolve on Nov 1, 2010 get things moving next time?[/QUOTE

Why didn't this group start with Immediate Individual Resolve Jun 2004??

Last edited by RedeyeAV8r; 09-13-2006 at 12:57 PM.
RedeyeAV8r is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zoro
Cargo
32
07-26-2012 06:32 AM
SleepyF18
Cargo
104
09-11-2006 10:23 AM
dckozak
Cargo
76
09-07-2006 01:24 PM
Diesel 10
Cargo
3
08-30-2006 05:38 AM
AUS_ATC
Cargo
2
08-15-2006 08:05 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices