Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FDX-Interim Elections in blocks 1 & 4 >

FDX-Interim Elections in blocks 1 & 4

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX-Interim Elections in blocks 1 & 4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-05-2011, 03:23 PM
  #21  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 30
Default 2 shots 2 hits

Unless your name is really aerisarmis I didn't miss on you hiding behind a false name. And since I am not now nor have I ever been a DW crony I didn't miss on the false accusation shot either. Nice try.

Originally Posted by AerisArmis View Post
He shoots, he misses! Henchmen? You were talking about false accusations I believe? I'm just a dues paying member watching the union political intrigue with interest (from the outside). If your post is an example of the demeanor you will bring to the table, heaven help us.
TonyHaus is offline  
Old 07-05-2011, 03:31 PM
  #22  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 30
Default Runners

EI is a good guy. He has experience too. If I wasn't running, I'd vote for him. JN has never held any position. He needs to volunteer on some committee and gain some experience before taking a leadership role. If you look at any functional organization like Rotary INTL or even the PTSA, none of them put folks into leadership roles until they have trained at a lower level first. We have to stop doing that because management is too good at what they do to allow newbies to run things. I don't mean anything bad to JN I'm sure he's a great guy, its just an expereince thing. A squadron never takes an ensign and makes him the ops officer. I look forward to him volunteering somewhere like communications or negotiations and learning the ropes.

Capt Tony Hauserman

Originally Posted by MD11Fr8Dog View Post
I believe there are 2 others in the running for Block 4 - J.N. and E.I. formerly the SFS Rep.
TonyHaus is offline  
Old 07-05-2011, 04:25 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MaydayMark's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 4,304
Default

Originally Posted by TonyHaus View Post
Let me guess, you did all that research below to dig out policy manual information because you are just a line pilot who is curious to know?
Wow ... that's a new APC twist? A guy actually takes the time to research and quote the policy manual and Tony blasts him for it? I wonder if that's part of his "Throw the Bum Out" platform?

Originally Posted by TonyHaus View Post

EI is a good guy. I'd vote for him.

If you look at any functional organization like Rotary INTL or even the PTSA, none of them put folks into leadership roles until they have trained at a lower level first.
Finally something Tony and I can agree on. Vote for Tony for PTSA!
MaydayMark is offline  
Old 07-05-2011, 04:45 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,227
Default

E.I. has demonstrated that he has the backbone to stand up to the MEC "Group Think" mentality.
..............except on the Age 65 resolution........
Huck is offline  
Old 07-05-2011, 05:06 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Sounds like JN is our only hope. If only he didnt want the job he would be perfect.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 07-05-2011, 05:15 PM
  #26  
Slainge Var'
 
AerisArmis's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Zeppelin Tail Gunner
Posts: 1,530
Default

Originally Posted by TonyHaus View Post
Unless your name is really aerisarmis I didn't miss on you hiding behind a false name. And since I am not now nor have I ever been a DW crony I didn't miss on the false accusation shot either. Nice try.
Every couple of years some guy comes on, pulls his skirt up over his head, shows off his new thong, then demands that everybody do the same. There's lot's of very clever screen names here, mine might not be particularly clever, but it's latin. The fact that you want to change the rules to suit yourself speaks volumes.
But back to my original post, the one where I agreed with the previous poster and you took umbrage. IMO, there are two camps in our MEC. One is SS and his group. The second are folks associated with, or like thinkers of the previous MEC chairman (You are the only person to used the word "crony"). The second group tried to stage a late palace coup to gain the MEC officer positions. They failed, but it was very, very close. Too make up for this short coming, they, the second group, are running folks in the current block rep elections that would be helpful in their attempt to wrestle back control of the MEC. I said it was a good tactic and I'd do it myself if I was them.
That's my opinion. You don't like it? I don't care. I'm quite sure yours differs and you are entitled to it. Throw your opinion out, minus the vitriol, and see if a healthy discussion ensues.

AA, aka "The Henchman"

Last edited by AerisArmis; 07-05-2011 at 06:57 PM.
AerisArmis is offline  
Old 07-05-2011, 05:50 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
2cylinderdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 732
Default

Originally Posted by TonyHaus View Post
Scott,

The 105 credit hours is, as you know, from taking the 98 and then adding in the override. The override is paid via the company and converted into credit hours for pay purposes. The effect is about 105 hours give or take. But you know that right? Why can't you guys just run an honest campaign? Let me guess, you did all that research below to dig out policy manual information because you are just a line pilot who is curious to know? By the way, the officer pay of 103-105 credit hours (depending on if you are sec/treas, vice or chair) is plenty. It is not a trifling thing and work ethic should go along with it.
Well, an ALPA password gets you into the website where the "digging" occurred and my name is not Scott. Only a true politician can say I was wrong to call you out on your "exaggerations" it is 98 CH read it, override is for incidental expenses. You see the Officers can not draft or volunteer and are working way harder than many that make much more flying the line. If you want the guys to run ALPA that are willing to do it a a bigger loss if you have your way then we will be subject to a even smaller stable of people who are 1)qualified and 2) are willing to do it, throw the pay and benefits any lower and you lose out on many. Not because it is such a great deal, the opposite it just sucks more.

I did not even call you out on your duty officer jam or your "commuter" claim. Policy manual seems pretty clear Tony, if you think they are violating policy then I suspect you have already conducted and investigation with the FOC? Or will that occur after you are elected.

One last thing, Scott is not running for Office, you are and you appear to be running on the platform of what is wrong with the Joneses not what is right about the FPA era lackeys. Bring on the change Tony, right back to 1998.
2cylinderdriver is offline  
Old 07-05-2011, 06:26 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,224
Default

Can't say I was a fan of the DW era at all. However, Tony was very correct when he spoke of the lack of transparency. While I thought the coup attempt was absurd, it wouldn't hurt my feelings to see SS get the boot either...
golfandfly is offline  
Old 07-05-2011, 06:32 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 218
Default

OK then. Who can argue with logic like that. Let's hang him high, I mean, after all, if it wouldn't hurt your feelings, what's the harm?
finedavefine is offline  
Old 07-05-2011, 08:57 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Laughing_Jakal's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,336
Default

The fact that Tony thinks you have to have "ALPA Experience" to be a block rep speaks volumes. I'm not in a block to vote for or against....but to see him come here and vomit all over the board certainly doesn't impress me.
Laughing_Jakal is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jim Mumby
Union Talk
1
02-25-2022 10:34 PM
Jim Mumby
Cargo
16
11-10-2010 08:20 AM
vagabond
Cargo
83
07-14-2010 07:27 AM
Gooch121
Cargo
2
11-03-2008 10:54 AM
masspilot
Cargo
2
05-11-2008 09:42 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices