Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Say "NO" to FDX CBA Section 29 >

Say "NO" to FDX CBA Section 29

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Say "NO" to FDX CBA Section 29

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-11-2012, 06:53 AM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Default

Originally Posted by FXDX View Post
...Its still a free country, a pilot should be free to decide if they feel the benefits of the union are worth the cost of membership...
It's not a free country. Try not paying your taxes, if you don't agree with what your government is doing.

I really don't care if someone doesn't want to join our union. But, I do care very strongly that a freeloader would benefit from the same contract that I am paying for.

I love to see non-members paying their agency shop fees. Rest assured, they wouldn't throw a nickel in the pot if they if they weren't forced to.
Busboy is offline  
Old 05-11-2012, 07:21 AM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Originally Posted by FXDX View Post
In other words, allow the union to stand on its own, and if it can't then yes, let it fall apart. I don't think that would happen, nor do I want it to. We agree on number 2, we are better off with the union, but I still feel it should be able to stand on its own merit.
Instead of political theory lets focus on practical application in the mixed pilot culture we have at FDX. Scattered among the "good guys" we have non-members hired since the late '90s. These guys are hardcore ME ME ME with no sense of fraternity that you and I take for granted. IMHO, that had to stop. If we can stop one more new guy from buying a sports car with his dues money it was worth it.

I don't want to see folks quit in their last year to shield their paycheck either. Or quit because their panties are in a wad about whatever pet issue. That seems to be popular in modern politics and is disgraceful. It's cancerous to ANY union that may represent us. Agency shop protects us from freeloaders and hot heads.

We have a lot of guys who think of themselves as private contractors but most now grudgingly pay dues. You know, some of the guys who protected carryover when line averages were cut and were happy their 777 and 757 lines were 25 hours more than A300 and 727. Some of them are almost totally oblivious to everyone around them. They couldn't even spell 4a2b. But they know how to spell VEBA and retroactive age 65. Those are the guys ALL OF US need protection from with agency shop.

Last edited by Gunter; 05-11-2012 at 07:38 AM.
Gunter is offline  
Old 05-11-2012, 07:35 AM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RedeyeAV8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Default

Originally Posted by FXDX View Post
Sorry to edit your post, just wanted to highlight a couple of things. Why the quip about not really being here that long if you are really an FO? Folks here over 9.5 years before they could hold any other seat but an FO, is that not long enough to have an opinion on our union? That is the implication.

I appreciate your recap of how we got to ALPA current, but it doesn't change the fact that the union should be responsive to the membership. In an ideal world, it would be so valuable to our careers and quality of life that we wouldn't even be having a discussion about its worthiness. Sadly, that is not the case.

Secondly, in your opinion its the right thing to do (to be in the union). Where have we heard that before? Realize that is your opinion, not a universal truth. Some of us believe that the right thing to do is to not force membership in anything, let alone a union. Its still a free country, a pilot should be free to decide if they feel the benefits of the union are worth the cost of membership.

In other words, allow the union to stand on its own, and if it can't then yes, let it fall apart. I don't think that would happen, nor do I want it to. We agree on number 2, we are better off with the union, but I still feel it should be able to stand on its own merit.

We also agree that Agency Shop will never go away with an ALPA contract, that is truly water under the bridge.
FDX

The thing about being an FO wasn't a quip. But to answer your question, someone who has been here 10 years or less doesn't know or didn't experience the History before we had ALPA 2 and our First "Negotiated" Contract.

I did not imply that someone with 10 years can't make up their own mind.

Here is the rub. Before we had Agency shop we had a lot of non members.
That was their Choice, but many of us chose to pay dues and support whatever Union was on property. Many sacrificed personal time and effort to achieve better conditions, pay, benefits. That cost each of us paying a lot of money.

When we achieved all these improvements.
It took over 10 years and 3 attempts at a UNION.
*Large increase of Medical benefit Cap from 1 Million to 2 million.
*A Real Contractual A Fund (which would have been frozen 8 years ago if not for a UNION Contract!
* B-Fund (now 7%)
*800 Million Life Insurance Policy
*LTD benefits
* Pretty Good Pay raise from 1993
*Jump-seat and Captain's Authority

There were other improvements and yes there was some take away by MGT.

At one point since FPA contract #1, we had over 400 non members. Now we have 50. The vast Majority of our ACP's and Instructors are good members. That wasn't true before.

I agree it is a Free country. A Pilot should be free to Choose.

I also feel that if a Pilot chooses not to belong or pay his/her Fair share, that the UNION SHOULD BE FREE TO CHOOSE if he should continue to get the benefits the UNION secured for him in the Contract, ie. no more B fund, no more A fund free it when dues payments are stopped. No VEBA
Furthermore the Union should not have to defend them during Discipline or contractual issues.

But alas, the Department of Labor or DOL says this cannot happen, that would be illegal.
Non members get everything the paying Members gets in other words Free loading on the Backs of Dues paying Members.
The Non member gets Union representation during Disciplinary hearing.

The Union has gotten more than a few Non members's jobs back.
There was a large amount of Dues Money spent on Non members because it is required by the DOL under Duty of Fair Representation or DFR.

So in a Nut shell it is Not a Free Country for there Union either.
It costs money to Administer the Contract. It cost Money to Negotiate a Contract. It cost money to run the Union day to day.

The Union has to pay, meaning US (or most of US).
Everyone gets the benefits, they should ALL have to pay.

Can you go Play 18 Holes at TPC without Paying?
If you were a Member of an expensive C/C what would you think if someone who wasn't a member or Guest just cut in and played in front of you?
Would you be a little Upset? Would the Offender be asked to leave or would the Members just say sure "it's a Free Country your Honor"?

Last edited by RedeyeAV8r; 05-11-2012 at 07:46 AM.
RedeyeAV8r is offline  
Old 05-11-2012, 08:05 AM
  #64  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 258
Default

OK I'm not an F/O. I have the been here a while I remember the PARKING LOT contract. And some of our old leaders like Frank Fat@o0. Who by the way left FPA/ALPA with unpaid dues. Union history at FDX is good if you are a revisionist.
skeebo2 is offline  
Old 05-11-2012, 08:09 AM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RedeyeAV8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Default

Originally Posted by skeebo2 View Post
OK I'm not an F/O. I have the been here a while I remember the PARKING LOT contract. And some of our old leaders like Frank Fat@o0. Who by the way left FPA/ALPA with unpaid dues. Union history at FDX is good if you are a revisionist.
and I believe he retired before we had Agency Shop
RedeyeAV8r is offline  
Old 05-11-2012, 08:14 AM
  #66  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 258
Default

Still a dirt bag move

Ok move recent history how bot DW and not bidding the 777? And what did he do.

Wasn't there 2 vps ago the union rep who worked so hard with not flying and getting association buy backs he went NOQ.

Yea we have had some at gems at the union
skeebo2 is offline  
Old 05-11-2012, 08:35 AM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RedeyeAV8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Default

Originally Posted by skeebo2 View Post
Still a dirt bag move

Ok move recent history how bot DW and not bidding the 777? And what did he do.

Wasn't there 2 vps ago the union rep who worked so hard with not flying and getting association buy backs he went NOQ.

Yea we have had some at gems at the union
Didnt We have the same issues at FAB, and FPA?

not defending anybody, but. Wasn't the 777 filled with pilots before DW bid it?

If DW didn't bid it would everyone have avoided it?

Sounds like your issues are with specific individuals rather than Agency Shop
RedeyeAV8r is offline  
Old 05-11-2012, 08:39 AM
  #68  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 258
Default

* B-Fund (now 7%)
*800 Million Life Insurance Policy
*LTD benefits
* Pretty Good Pay raise from 1993
*Jump-seat and Captain's Authority

$500 a year co match 401k joke
Life insurance in lieu of a pension style death benefit we got bought out cheap
Pay raise over 19 year 1993-2012 eliminated by inflation not even close or funny
911/tsa did in the jump seat. Block out with a MX item/ T/O with+1000lbs fly direct loads of authority now.
skeebo2 is offline  
Old 05-11-2012, 08:43 AM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by Gunter View Post
Instead of political theory lets focus on practical application in the mixed pilot culture we have at FDX. Scattered among the "good guys" we have non-members hired since the late '90s. These guys are hardcore ME ME ME with no sense of fraternity that you and I take for granted. IMHO, that had to stop. If we can stop one more new guy from buying a sports car with his dues money it was worth it.

I don't want to see folks quit in their last year to shield their paycheck either. Or quit because their panties are in a wad about whatever pet issue. That seems to be popular in modern politics and is disgraceful. It's cancerous to ANY union that may represent us. Agency shop protects us from freeloaders and hot heads.

We have a lot of guys who think of themselves as private contractors but most now grudgingly pay dues. You know, some of the guys who protected carryover when line averages were cut and were happy their 777 and 757 lines were 25 hours more than A300 and 727. Some of them are almost totally oblivious to everyone around them. They couldn't even spell 4a2b. But they know how to spell VEBA and retroactive age 65. Those are the guys ALL OF US need protection from with agency shop.
And I still say bull on the membership and free loaders. I will bet 99% of the guys hired between 1999 and the 2006 contract joined and stayed. The only freeloaders of consequence here were probably pre alpa 1 FPA or alpa 2 hires. The union shop has not made more than a 2% difference in dues collected.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 05-11-2012, 07:20 PM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PastV1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: 11 Capt
Posts: 509
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG View Post
And I still say bull on the membership and free loaders. I will bet 99% of the guys hired between 1999 and the 2006 contract joined and stayed. The only freeloaders of consequence here were probably pre alpa 1 FPA or alpa 2 hires. The union shop has not made more than a 2% difference in dues collected.
It has because the "1 issue wonders" can't quit.
PastV1 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
HumptyDumpty
Cargo
137
02-11-2011 03:10 AM
Pinchanickled
Regional
11
12-21-2010 03:58 PM
DMEarc
Regional
1249
12-17-2010 10:37 PM
RockBottom
Major
3
09-23-2005 02:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices