Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Age 65 effect on FDX-UPS upgrades >

Age 65 effect on FDX-UPS upgrades

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Age 65 effect on FDX-UPS upgrades

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-30-2007 | 10:23 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: CRJ-200 Captain
Default Age 65 effect on FDX-UPS upgrades

to you fine noggins at FDX and UPS, how would the new Age 65 rule affect upgrades to the left seat? As in, slightly or significantly? Many thanks.
Reply
Old 01-30-2007 | 10:37 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,253
Likes: 0
Default

Significantly.....
Reply
Old 01-30-2007 | 10:45 AM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: CRJ-200 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Huck
Significantly.....
what airline, FDX or UPS? Thanks.
Reply
Old 01-30-2007 | 10:49 AM
  #4  
BoxFlyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
From: B-767
Default

How bout every airline out there, not just the cargo guys.
Reply
Old 01-30-2007 | 10:54 AM
  #5  
ryane946's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 2
From: FO, looking left
Default

Significantly.

Probably the best way to describe it is that you may have to work an extra 5 years to make the same amount of money. That means:
More time at regional airlines
More time spent on reserve
More time spent commuting
More time spent at crashpads
More time spent as FO
More time spent on smaller equipment making less money
More time having crappy schedules

But the ultimate impact is that there is a now a greater supply of pilots. Higher supply means less demand, means less pay, workrules, etc...

I can't believe all the time we spend here bitching about things that hurt the industry like scope, pay, work rules, scabs, outsourcing, etc...
But we have not had an organized effort to fight a change to age 60.
The industry is going to h*ll. We have the power to stop that. Do what you can to make sure age 60 is never changed.
Reply
Old 01-30-2007 | 11:06 AM
  #6  
BoilerUP's Avatar
Doing One Pilot's Job
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,891
Likes: 130
Default

Originally Posted by ryane946
Probably the best way to describe it is that you may have to work an extra 5 years to make the same amount of money.
The problem is that even at the top of your earning potential those last 5 years, you'll still never make back what you have lost...
Reply
Old 01-30-2007 | 11:09 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,047
Likes: 0
From: 767 FO
Default

Originally Posted by CRJammin
to you fine noggins at FDX and UPS, how would the new Age 65 rule affect upgrades to the left seat? As in, slightly or significantly? Many thanks.
Depends on the rules, I'll let you know in five years. On a similar note why don't we get rid of the guys and gals that have been with a company for 25 years. Lets face it 25 years of hub turning must have similar effects to a body as aging. Most of them can't increase their pension significantly anyways. If they don't have a pension; well, they had their shot. If they didn't save enough tough. They are in my seat. Move them out.

Additional thought, with all the mergers it might be tough to figure out what 25 years with one company is. Maybe the Feds can just put a 25 year time limit on an ATP. I got mine in 1999 so I'm good till I'm 78.

Lag

Please note sarcasm in red.

Last edited by FDXLAG; 01-30-2007 at 11:37 AM.
Reply
Old 01-30-2007 | 11:11 AM
  #8  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 2
From: DC-8 756/767
Default

Originally Posted by ryane946
Significantly.

Probably the best way to describe it is that you may have to work an extra 5 years to make the same amount of money. That means:
More time at regional airlines
More time spent on reserve
More time spent commuting
More time spent at crashpads
More time spent as FO
More time spent on smaller equipment making less money
More time having crappy schedules

But the ultimate impact is that there is a now a greater supply of pilots. Higher supply means less demand, means less pay, workrules, etc...

I can't believe all the time we spend here bitching about things that hurt the industry like scope, pay, work rules, scabs, outsourcing, etc...
But we have not had an organized effort to fight a change to age 60.
The industry is going to h*ll. We have the power to stop that. Do what you can to make sure age 60 is never changed.


AMEN!! Now I have to wait 5 more years probably to uprade, get a better sched. etc. Oh but that's OK because now I GET to work 5 more years of night cargo flying. Just what I want to do when I am 60-65. Maybe if I am lucky, I can get displaced by some retred coming off the panel. Oh what fun this is going to be. And for all UPSers out there, with the 72 going away, and the age limit raised, get ready for some fun in the next few years.
Reply
Old 01-30-2007 | 11:30 AM
  #9  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: CRJ-200 Captain
Default

Won't your international growth counter the lack of upcoming retirements, however?
Reply
Old 01-30-2007 | 11:32 AM
  #10  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 2
From: DC-8 756/767
Default

Originally Posted by CRJammin
Won't your international growth counter the lack of upcoming retirements, however?
UPS will find some way to either stop hiring, or furlough.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zoro
Cargo
32
07-26-2012 06:32 AM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
29
05-22-2007 07:51 AM
fireman0174
Major
79
01-07-2007 08:46 AM
fireman0174
Major
46
11-19-2006 05:49 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices