Miami Air
#332
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: CE-560XL
Posts: 127
Wow, genius. You figured it out. Some operators pay more than others.
What the hell justifies your arrogant nose-high view of the employees? Does it smack you in the gut that they don't make as much as you, or is there some other reason for your chutzpah?
A simple "glad no one was killed" will suffice, in light of the fact that the aircraft is just barely cool.
I will say this: it's attitudes like yours, and people like you, that truly make me sick. In fact, it's your special kind of lofty pride that led me to start posting in the first place, many years ago. I don't say that to a lot of folks, but your attitude leaves me wanting to vomit in our direction. You truly disgust me.
What the hell justifies your arrogant nose-high view of the employees? Does it smack you in the gut that they don't make as much as you, or is there some other reason for your chutzpah?
A simple "glad no one was killed" will suffice, in light of the fact that the aircraft is just barely cool.
I will say this: it's attitudes like yours, and people like you, that truly make me sick. In fact, it's your special kind of lofty pride that led me to start posting in the first place, many years ago. I don't say that to a lot of folks, but your attitude leaves me wanting to vomit in our direction. You truly disgust me.
Last edited by flightbag; 05-05-2019 at 04:01 PM.
#333
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Posts: 493
Whether it is or not, there were animals in the hold. And there are humans who are now devastated because the animals are dead.
Nine thousand foot runway with a 1000-foot-plus overrun of it in a 737. Somebody's in trouble.
The NTSB report should be as fun reading as the WN Burbank overrun one. Except I will be thinking about those poor animals when I read it.
I really do think that AMC ought to be doing a white-glove inspection of the passenger-carrying charter airlines that it hires, with a particular view as to who is flying their aircraft -- i.e. pilot training and experience. That Atlas accident could just as easily have been a 767 filled with troops as an Amazon flight of boxes -- the Atlas 767 crews fly them all. And given what we now "know" happened in that Atlas cockpit, and what we think we know about the history of the PF, particularly about his reaction when startled and exposed to somatogravic heads-up illusion, it's a fair question whether the military is unnecessarily putting troops in harm's way by putting them in the back of aircraft flown by pilots of this background, experience and training.
This is a question that AMC should have asked when Atlas bent a perfectly-good 767 -- which WAS filled with troops -- in a landing on a clear, windless day at PSM. On a trip flown by somebody undergoing IOE.
I think AMC will find that some of their carriers excel in this area, and that others are lacking. How hard would it be to stand-down, say, National, Miami Air and Atlas, and leave Omni and ATI, plus the major-airline CRAF members, to cover until AMC can really understand who is flying its chartered planes?
Nine thousand foot runway with a 1000-foot-plus overrun of it in a 737. Somebody's in trouble.
The NTSB report should be as fun reading as the WN Burbank overrun one. Except I will be thinking about those poor animals when I read it.
I really do think that AMC ought to be doing a white-glove inspection of the passenger-carrying charter airlines that it hires, with a particular view as to who is flying their aircraft -- i.e. pilot training and experience. That Atlas accident could just as easily have been a 767 filled with troops as an Amazon flight of boxes -- the Atlas 767 crews fly them all. And given what we now "know" happened in that Atlas cockpit, and what we think we know about the history of the PF, particularly about his reaction when startled and exposed to somatogravic heads-up illusion, it's a fair question whether the military is unnecessarily putting troops in harm's way by putting them in the back of aircraft flown by pilots of this background, experience and training.
This is a question that AMC should have asked when Atlas bent a perfectly-good 767 -- which WAS filled with troops -- in a landing on a clear, windless day at PSM. On a trip flown by somebody undergoing IOE.
I think AMC will find that some of their carriers excel in this area, and that others are lacking. How hard would it be to stand-down, say, National, Miami Air and Atlas, and leave Omni and ATI, plus the major-airline CRAF members, to cover until AMC can really understand who is flying its chartered planes?
Last edited by wjcandee; 05-05-2019 at 05:43 PM.
#334
All airlines including the Major carriers, because some of the biggest idiots I’ve ever flown with have fooled the HR and training departments of the big 5 too.
#335
Line Holder
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Position: Phenom Left Seat
Posts: 73
#336
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2014
Posts: 150
Incorrect. There are a mix of civilians, civilian contract workers, and active duty military families on GTMO with household pets.
Mobilized or deployed troops can not bring families or pets, but full time stationed troops and civilian workers have their whole families and pets on station.
It’s not just military working dogs (and there was a cat onboard too).
Mobilized or deployed troops can not bring families or pets, but full time stationed troops and civilian workers have their whole families and pets on station.
It’s not just military working dogs (and there was a cat onboard too).
#337
Disinterested Third Party
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,026
What am is sickened by the likes of you.
What I am not is associated with Miami Air. Never have been.
This is, of course irrelevant, but your assumption doesn't speak well of you.
It's rather pathetic that you're so deeply offended by someone else's job. Perhaps you should mind your own damn business.
#338
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: CE-560XL
Posts: 127
I am what I am, captain obvious. Yes, indeed, I am.
What am is sickened by the likes of you.
What I am not is associated with Miami Air. Never have been.
This is, of course irrelevant, but your assumption doesn't speak well of you.
It's rather pathetic that you're so deeply offended by someone else's job. Perhaps you should mind your own damn business.
What am is sickened by the likes of you.
What I am not is associated with Miami Air. Never have been.
This is, of course irrelevant, but your assumption doesn't speak well of you.
It's rather pathetic that you're so deeply offended by someone else's job. Perhaps you should mind your own damn business.
#340
Disinterested Third Party
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,026
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post