Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > CommutAir
All economy 50 seats gone from EWR 2022? >

All economy 50 seats gone from EWR 2022?

Search
Notices
CommutAir Regional Airline

All economy 50 seats gone from EWR 2022?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-27-2021, 09:36 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2021
Posts: 172
Default

Originally Posted by PossibleDeviation View Post
Good luck as OO owns their 175s...
Not true. Ships 601-630 are United owned. The same ones were at ExpressJet before transferring them to Skywest last year
MrIncredible is offline  
Old 04-27-2021, 10:46 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,219
Default

United doesn’t really own that many 175’s. I would think that it would be cheaper to keep them flying at large well established regionals than to move them to another airline. United is simply going to do what makes them the most money. The only way that I see them shifting 175’s to either Air Wisconsin or CommutAir is if they bid the flying cheaper than Mesa.
Hedley is offline  
Old 04-27-2021, 12:14 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2019
Posts: 429
Default

Originally Posted by molitvic13 View Post
But how? 175 is maxed out per United’s Scope Clause. Unless United transfers 175s from Mesa or Skywest.

and because they were maxed out on the 175 side, the 550 was born.
Maybe they will get scope relief or shift the frames from one of the carriers whom they own the airplanes from. I have no idea but we do know that the 50 seaters are getting older every year
Flydafe is offline  
Old 04-27-2021, 12:17 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2019
Posts: 429
Default

Originally Posted by MrIncredible View Post
Not true. Ships 601-630 are United owned. The same ones were at ExpressJet before transferring them to Skywest last year
Those were nice airplanes too. Mesa also floated the next thirty frame deal but I’m not sure if United is paying the note on them after some kind of news broke about who is paying for what. I’m sure someone knows the details. I don’t think United will allow another one of it’s regionals to go down
Flydafe is offline  
Old 04-27-2021, 12:28 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,219
Default

Originally Posted by Flydafe View Post
I don’t think United will allow another one of it’s regionals to go down
There were/are somewhere north of 300 of the 50 seat rj’s flying around. Since scope is maxed out and there are no more 70/76 seat aircraft available, how does United avoid letting regionals go if they decided to retire the single class 50 seaters over the next few years? Two of their regionals only operate 50 seaters, and SkyWest operates a bunch as well. If a fleet is phased out, those employed operating or supporting them will unfortunately most likely be phased out too.
Hedley is offline  
Old 04-27-2021, 03:43 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2019
Posts: 164
Default

IIRC on one of the town halls RH talked about looking into 175s in the future (6 years down line IIRC) but wondering if it’s only lip service or a real strategy.
FAR121 is offline  
Old 04-27-2021, 04:46 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ReadOnly7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,327
Default

Originally Posted by Flydafe View Post
I don’t think United will allow another one of it’s regionals to go down
Lol.....as if United didn’t CHOOSE to shut down TSA and XJT. The tail does not wag the dog.
ReadOnly7 is offline  
Old 04-27-2021, 06:49 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2019
Posts: 164
Default

DK why United shut down TSA but as for XJT it was most likely the very senior lifers that were a payroll liability.
FAR121 is offline  
Old 04-27-2021, 07:45 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ReadOnly7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,327
Default

Originally Posted by FAR121 View Post
DK why United shut down TSA but as for XJT it was most likely the very senior lifers that were a payroll liability.
TSA was pre-Covid and was most likely just a victim of consolidation. XJT died because c5 is cheaper. Period.
ReadOnly7 is offline  
Old 04-27-2021, 09:20 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2019
Posts: 164
Default

Originally Posted by ReadOnly7 View Post
TSA was pre-Covid and was most likely just a victim of consolidation. XJT died because c5 is cheaper. Period.
What are the odds of UAL shuttering C5 for OO or MESA due to them operating 175s cheaply? At least give us a chance and dont feed us to the wolves. (OO MESA)
FAR121 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mispoken
Delta
62
06-20-2018 11:19 AM
Zoomie
Major
364
07-02-2012 06:45 AM
vagabond
Major
7
05-09-2012 07:06 AM
DR Pilot
United
8
09-22-2011 07:58 AM
fireman0174
Major
21
05-21-2006 04:09 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices