Aviate
#52
On Reserve
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 70
Likes: 11
Same if not worse. Some quality pilots being turned down, just like other places. I personally have not done it but it’s a giant disappointment for a program with seeing some excellent peers get turned down. Only thing I’m looking forward to is this new contract. Hoping for the best.
#53
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Same if not worse. Some quality pilots being turned down, just like other places. I personally have not done it but it’s a giant disappointment for a program with seeing some excellent peers get turned down. Only thing I’m looking forward to is this new contract. Hoping for the best.
I've hired a lot of technical talent over the years in another industry and for all the objective criteria that can be evaluated I've found the subjective one-on-one interview to be the most indicative of successful candidates. I realize some people get nervous and don't interview well, but in the vast majority of cases I can tell whether someone will be good at their job and easy to work with just by having a good conversation.
FWIW, I've flown recently with three pilots that have been through the process. All great guys. One passed, two failed. Small sample size, of course, but disturbingly representative of the numbers I've been hearing.
#54
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
but in the vast majority of cases I can tell whether someone will be good at their job and easy to work with just by having a good conversation.
Not having a go at you....more the human condition. And here in lies the problem with these subjective assessments of others over a 4 hr period to see if they are suitable to work in said organization for the next 25 to 30 years. All very odd.
From what I'm seeing some people are too valuable to be poached (because that's what's happening) from their respective regional..... Lesson here is be a good guy but not a valuable one.
Last edited by Tom Bradys Cat; 12-28-2019 at 04:20 AM.
#55
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 23
From: It's a plane and it's a seat
I have seen all of the above make it through the whole process and they are now flying the line at UA.
#56
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Yeah it seems that roughly 30-35% pass over at Xjet so I’m just really confused about this whole program. Aviate and Propel threw some of us at Envoy through a loop since we thought these programs were designed to be a flow.
In any case, my wishes to y’all for getting a new contract you deserve.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
In any case, my wishes to y’all for getting a new contract you deserve.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#57
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Wouldn't have a clue. But it makes sence for the mothership to not poach one of its regionals if it doesn't have to. Consider the ramifications if UA actually did take ALL of the best candidates......i.e ALL LCAs.....
Last edited by Tom Bradys Cat; 12-28-2019 at 08:00 AM.
#58
You just train new ones. LCAs aren’t that hard to replace. Most of the people I see being denied are great guys BUT still have SOME slight issue that may or may not be a red flag.
#59
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Yeah sure you can train more.... But soon that'll get expensive especially when all your LCAs, simulator instructors, CPs, ACPs, or an APDs get poached.
I just used LCAs as an example. Yeah sure they are all replaceable...but at a cost.
I just used LCAs as an example. Yeah sure they are all replaceable...but at a cost.
#60
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 23
From: It's a plane and it's a seat
I can tell you from first hand experience every type I listed above has made it to UA. Just disputing your theory
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



