Citation II/SII/Bravo/Serria Super II
#61
New Hire
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: Citation 551 Single Pilot & L-39
Posts: 9
That's way, WAY low in my experience...especially if you're including fixed costs in the figure like hangar & insurance in that figure. If you're getting by for that little hourly cost for that few annual hours in a legacy 500-series Citation, you're a very fortunate operator!
Average block fuel burns of 180gph (very typical in legacy 550) put you around $700/hr alone...and on our airplane (1983 model) we budgeted about $250/hr for engines and $250/hr for parts & labor. Our plane was immaculately maintained, but we had many small but recurring issues that were quite pricey (multiple failed copilot vacuum AIs, multiple underwing fuel panel leaks, etc).
In 2008, we paid under $12k for $2.2M hull/$10M liability insurance on our airplane with both named PICs around 3000tt.
Recurrent at Simcom MCO was about $5500, with PIC initials running somewhere in the $12k ballpark.
Average block fuel burns of 180gph (very typical in legacy 550) put you around $700/hr alone...and on our airplane (1983 model) we budgeted about $250/hr for engines and $250/hr for parts & labor. Our plane was immaculately maintained, but we had many small but recurring issues that were quite pricey (multiple failed copilot vacuum AIs, multiple underwing fuel panel leaks, etc).
In 2008, we paid under $12k for $2.2M hull/$10M liability insurance on our airplane with both named PICs around 3000tt.
Recurrent at Simcom MCO was about $5500, with PIC initials running somewhere in the $12k ballpark.
In three years and about 530 hr, my 1979 550/551 (now ~5400 TTAF and ~2000 on the engines) has required two HS boots, replacement of the forward baggage door latches to comply with the recent AD note, one set of tires, just installed complete new brake packs, one fuel leak this year discovered during Phase 5, and a few other minor items. Never had a copilot AI problem, although I did replace a heading gyro during the first year and the left N1 gage twice. And a motive flow pressure switch under the right wing (if you can't start an engine because you can't even get a light on the starter button, don't go into the hell hole until you've checked this! I understand that many aircraft have them removed completely, but the Citation Center mechanic installed a new one after two days of troubleshooting to find the problem - so now I have the opportunity for it to fail again. . .).
I should add in another ~$30K for maintenance done "on the road" that I hadn't thought about earlier, so add in another ~$60/hr. It's still going to be in the $1000/hr range, again not counting engine overhaul allowance nor depreciation.
My maintenance shop is Aviation Classics at Reno/Stead (used to be called "Mig Alley"), who also does my L-39.
Walt
#62
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: C560/G200
Posts: 117
Thanks Walt and Boiler, appreciate all the info.
I'm still holding out hope that my potential buyer will purchase a jet. He "pushed it back a few months" because he decided to open a new store instead of the plane.... :-(
Maybe it will work out better in the long run this way!
I'm still holding out hope that my potential buyer will purchase a jet. He "pushed it back a few months" because he decided to open a new store instead of the plane.... :-(
Maybe it will work out better in the long run this way!
#63
Charter job
I'm getting furloughed from Mesa Airlines in September, but I think I've got something lined up with charter company in a light jet as right seat occupant lol. If I like the 91/135 job and can get typed that would be great, I may not need to go back to Mesa if/when they recall. Only issue is if I work for a charter operator I can only assume I wont get the jumpseat/flight bennies with the airlines. From what I hear on these posts is that this type of flying is far better than 121 flying. Would it be worth it to stay flying charter or going back to 121 when they recall? Also, which is the better option financially? I havent made more than about 30k in years!
Also the company said they would not be putting me through any training initially, just the 3 bounces. Would my flying this plane be logable time on a single pilot jet?
Also the company said they would not be putting me through any training initially, just the 3 bounces. Would my flying this plane be logable time on a single pilot jet?
#64
I'm getting furloughed from Mesa Airlines in September, but I think I've got something lined up with charter company in a light jet as right seat occupant lol. If I like the 91/135 job and can get typed that would be great, I may not need to go back to Mesa if/when they recall. Only issue is if I work for a charter operator I can only assume I wont get the jumpseat/flight bennies with the airlines. From what I hear on these posts is that this type of flying is far better than 121 flying. Would it be worth it to stay flying charter or going back to 121 when they recall? Also, which is the better option financially? I havent made more than about 30k in years!
Corporate/charter CAN be better than 121 regional flying, but its not a guaranteed thing and you may very well find you wish you were back under Mesa's meager work rules sooner rather than later...because at least 91 there are none.
Same goes for compensation - you might make out better than when you were at Mesa, and you might make out worse. You might like the lifestyle, and you might hate it...its a very personal decision.
minitour could give you a better idea on contemporary 135 SIC pay in Citations but a Part 91 Citation copilot should be making $35k-50k + standard benefits.
Also the company said they would not be putting me through any training initially, just the 3 bounces. Would my flying this plane be logable time on a single pilot jet?
Also, what kind of airplane will you be flying? If you have a valid 61.55 endorsement (gotten by 3 bounces, etc) then you should be able to log SIC, at least on the 91 legs...and if its 135 then you'll be a required crewmember and yeah you can log SIC.
#65
Also, what kind of airplane will you be flying? If you have a valid 61.55 endorsement (gotten by 3 bounces, etc) then you should be able to log SIC, at least on the 91 legs...and if its 135 then you'll be a required crewmember and yeah you can log SIC.[/quote]
Great info, thanks....its a CJ1. Right now any jet flying or any flying for that matter, is better than sitting on my **s collecting AZ unemployment.
Great info, thanks....its a CJ1. Right now any jet flying or any flying for that matter, is better than sitting on my **s collecting AZ unemployment.
#66
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 450
-mini
#69
New Hire
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: Citation 551 Single Pilot & L-39
Posts: 9
I find it easy to fly, but I probably wouldn't without the upgraded panel (Garmin 530W/430W/GMX-200 with electronic charts, Sandel 4.5" EADI and EHSI). In fact, after flying with this setup for about 400 hr, I wouldn't fly hard IFR as a single pilot without a good (and redundant) moving map system. In fact, the L-39 is getting dual Aspen displays put in now, with a Garmin 430 WAAS to drive them, just in case I go IFR with it. And an autopilot, of course.
Walt
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post