It's just the flu!
#391
It’s looking more promising for sure. At the beginning, when the virus was unmitigated, daily rates were climbing like a rocket ship, then they suddenly started tapering off. Even 2 weeks after economies started reopening the trend continued down, which is great news, it means the actions we’re taking are working and the spread can be controlled. But, if we completely let our guard down there’s likely no reason the virus wouldn’t spread as aggressively again. I will not be surprised if the riots end up setting us back a few weeks (we’ll likely know in a week or so).
If death rate for those under 60 and not occupationally exposed is less than 0.4% (and it is) then every thousand people who get the illness wind up leaving behind 996 who are at least relatively immune, and given the number of totally asymptomatic cases that never get diagnosed (The USS Theodore Roosevelt had out of a crew of 5000 about 1000 infected, but 3000 with antibodies, most totally asymptomatic and with only one (1) death)even higher numbers than that who are now resistant or immune.
Herd immunity happens. It does not require a fixed percentage, ANY number of immunes out there helps to slow the epidemic to some degree. Right now coronavirus has taken out the most susceptible and left behind both the less susceptible and the once most susceptible but now immunes. The longer this goes on the less effective the spread of the organism will be. Similarly, the strains of the coronavirus that are the most susceptible at spreading will be the less lethal strains. That’s just how epidemics always have worked and there is no indication this one will work any differently. Time itself is on our side.
#392
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
#393
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
#394
Far less than that. Simply 25% of the REPORTED deaths and that figure inflated by Medicare paying more for a COVID death than a death due to flu or other cauShe’s.
#396
Everyone that is panicking over a spike in infections seems to have a hard time remembering that there is a drastic disparity in the demographics most affected by this virus and more importantly that testing rates overall for the nation are still increasing. We keep casting a wider and wider net, we're going to catch more fish...but those fish were already out there!
Those that are most susceptible to health risks are also by and large not a part of the economy's labor pool. Keep the at-risk population protected. Keep the generally low-risk population at work. We cannot duplicate the lock-down of March through May should another wave of infections appear. It would be economically catastrophic on top of an already damaged economy AND it wouldn't be a rational decision based upon who the at-risk groups are.
The time frame and causes of the testing spool-up aside, we greatly increased our death rates by shoveling infected elderly into close quarters with other elderly. The evidence that this was a bad idea was present early on, but no one had the stones to stand up and demand a change of course when there was still time for a meaningful change to policy. Accounting for the financial incentives for coding things as COVID-19, for the CDCs admission that one does not need to be actually diagnosed with COVID-19 to be counted as COVID-19 death or COVID-19 infection, or top officials admissions that we are also counting anyone who dies WITH the virus, and not specifically FROM the virus, and it's no wonder that things look horrible.
There is still much to learn about this virus, but one thing that is clear at this point is who the most and least risk demographics are. That is actionable information that we can use NOW to greatly enhance our practices.
Those that are most susceptible to health risks are also by and large not a part of the economy's labor pool. Keep the at-risk population protected. Keep the generally low-risk population at work. We cannot duplicate the lock-down of March through May should another wave of infections appear. It would be economically catastrophic on top of an already damaged economy AND it wouldn't be a rational decision based upon who the at-risk groups are.
The time frame and causes of the testing spool-up aside, we greatly increased our death rates by shoveling infected elderly into close quarters with other elderly. The evidence that this was a bad idea was present early on, but no one had the stones to stand up and demand a change of course when there was still time for a meaningful change to policy. Accounting for the financial incentives for coding things as COVID-19, for the CDCs admission that one does not need to be actually diagnosed with COVID-19 to be counted as COVID-19 death or COVID-19 infection, or top officials admissions that we are also counting anyone who dies WITH the virus, and not specifically FROM the virus, and it's no wonder that things look horrible.
There is still much to learn about this virus, but one thing that is clear at this point is who the most and least risk demographics are. That is actionable information that we can use NOW to greatly enhance our practices.
#397
There is a lot going on in the world at the moment of course, but this cannot be overlooked. Reason has left the building if this nut job gets elected. And of course Fox News gives her air time. Dafuq.
#399
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Plane Coffee
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



