Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk > COVID19
Was COVID-19 Man Made in Chinese Lab? >

Was COVID-19 Man Made in Chinese Lab?

Search
Notices
COVID19 Pandemic Information and Reports

Was COVID-19 Man Made in Chinese Lab?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-16-2020, 09:25 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,982
Default

Originally Posted by TransWorld View Post
Agree with the chem-trails scenario, but your statement of the entire globe implies the earth is round. We all know the earth is flat.
Yes, but still round, like a disk. Bounded by mountains of ice on the edges.
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 09-16-2020, 09:29 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 644
Default

Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes View Post
Sure...but the chemtrails, I want to know more about the chemtrails.

You're not supposed to turn them on until FL 240 to avoid suspicion. They turn frogs gay, which by a 4th-order effect in a highly elaborate Deep State plan, will let the government take our rights away for a new world order where the World Supreme Being and Overlord gets rich, or something. There's also lizard people and aliens in there somewhere. Don't bang the aliens or they'll leave ghosts in your blood that give you ED. So quit feeling sorry for your grandpa, he knows what he did. Did I hit all of the not-so-fringe-anymore conspiracy high notes?
Duffman is offline  
Old 09-16-2020, 09:45 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,982
Default

Originally Posted by Duffman View Post
You're not supposed to turn them on until FL 240 to avoid suspicion. They turn frogs gay, which by a 4th-order effect in a highly elaborate Deep State plan, will let the government take our rights away for a new world order where the World Supreme Being and Overlord gets rich, or something. There's also lizard people and aliens in there somewhere. Don't bang the aliens or they'll leave ghosts in your blood that give you ED. So quit feeling sorry for your grandpa, he knows what he did. Did I hit all of the not-so-fringe-anymore conspiracy high notes?
And frogs can produce asexually, it's all making sense now.
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 09-16-2020, 09:56 AM
  #24  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 96
Default

Yuri Deigin and Bret Weinstein did a poscast talking about it. Bret Weinstein is a biologist and evolutionary theorist, Yuri Deigin specializes in genetics- link below to his Medium article discussing whether the current coronavirus came from a lab. TLDR, YES and the genetic material is 100% identical to a bat Coronavirus discovered in 2013.

https://medium.com/@yurideigin/lab-made-cov2-genealogy-through-the-lens-of-gain-of-function-research-f96dd7413748

I think I'll trust a biologist, someone familiar with the lab and someone who specializes in genetics over CCP propaganda.
Intrdmnslalien is offline  
Old 09-16-2020, 10:14 AM
  #25  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by Duffman View Post
Personally I see this as more proof it didn't originate maliciously from the Wuhan Lab because I'm sure China has facilities like Dugway out in the Gobi desert somewhere, which would be better suited for that type of work. Although, it wouldn't surprise me if the virus was released accidentally through bad biowaste protocols, but Chinese wet markets are such a breeding ground for zoonotic viruses that it just seems like the most probable cause. Also, this is, what, the third pandemic in the last 20 years to come from a Chinese wet market? I think it's high time we crack the whip on China for their damn wet markets.
It absolutely wasn’t the wet market. No animal sold at the market, or that’s native to Wuhan could have fostered the mutation for COVID-19. If it came from nature, then there is an intermediary animal that we haven’t discovered yet, that had to first get it from a bat, then undergo decades of mutations.

It’s important to note that the story it came from nature is the crazy conspiracy, given the facts.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 09-16-2020, 10:17 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,982
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah View Post
It absolutely wasn’t the wet market. No animal sold at the market, or that’s native to Wuhan could have fostered the mutation for COVID-19. If it came from nature, then there is an intermediary animal that we haven’t discovered yet, that had to first get it from a bat, then undergo decades of mutations.

It’s important to note that the story it came from nature is the crazy conspiracy, given the facts.
The crazy part is inserting what you want to be true. Absence of proof is not proof.
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 09-16-2020, 10:26 AM
  #27  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,501
Default

Originally Posted by Duffman View Post
Personally I see this as more proof it didn't originate maliciously from the Wuhan Lab because I'm sure China has facilities like Dugway out in the Gobi desert somewhere, which would be better suited for that type of work. Although, it wouldn't surprise me if the virus was released accidentally through bad biowaste protocols, but Chinese wet markets are such a breeding ground for zoonotic viruses that it just seems like the most probable cause. Also, this is, what, the third pandemic in the last 20 years to come from a Chinese wet market? I think it's high time we crack the whip on China for their damn wet markets.
Saying that this comes from a wet market because that would make it the third pandemic to come from a wet market is sort of making a claim beyond the data. Certainly accidental escapes of pathogens from laboratories are frequent enough. We had a discovery of a brand new Ebola variant - fortunately not terribly lethal to humans - 25 years ago right near Dulles airport:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/25-year...bola-outbreak/

But I agree about the non-malicious part.

"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity"


There were concerns raised about this lab from its inception.


The opportunities for international collaboration, meanwhile, will aid the genetic analysis and epidemiology of emergent diseases. “The world is facing more new emerging viruses, and we need more contribution from China,” says Gao. In particular, the emergence of zoonotic viruses — those that jump to humans from animals, such as SARS or Ebola — is a concern, says Bruno Lina, director of the VirPath virology lab in Lyon, France.

Many staff from the Wuhan lab have been training at a BSL-4 lab in Lyon, which some scientists find reassuring. And the facility has already carried out a test-run using a low-risk virus.

But worries surround the Chinese lab, too. The SARS virus has escaped from high-level containment facilities in Beijing multiple times, notes Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University in Piscataway, New Jersey. Tim Trevan, founder of CHROME Biosafety and Biosecurity Consulting in Damascus, Maryland, says that an open culture is important to keeping BSL-4 labs safe, and he questions how easy this will be in China, where society emphasizes hierarchy. “Diversity of viewpoint, flat structures where everyone feels free to speak up and openness of information are important,” he says.

Yuan says that he has worked to address this issue with staff. “We tell them the most important thing is that they report what they have or haven’t done,” he says. And the lab’s inter*national collaborations will increase openness. “Transparency is the basis of the lab,” he adds.

The plan to expand into a network heightens such concerns. One BSL-4 lab in Harbin is already awaiting accreditation; the next two are expected to be in Beijing and Kunming, the latter focused on using monkey models to study disease.

Lina says that China’s size justifies this scale, and that the opportunity to combine BSL-4 research with an abundance of research monkeys — Chinese researchers face less red tape than those in the West when it comes to research on primates — could be powerful. “If you want to test vaccines or antivirals, you need a non-human primate model,” says Lina.

But Ebright is not convinced of the need for more than one BSL-4 lab in mainland China. He suspects that the expansion there is a reaction to the networks in the United States and Europe, which he says are also unwarranted. He adds that governments will assume that such excess capacity is for the potential development of bioweapons.

“These facilities are inherently dual use,” he says. The prospect of ramping up opportunities to inject monkeys with pathogens also worries, rather than excites, him: “They can run, they can scratch, they can bite.”

Trevan says China’s investment in a BSL-4 lab may, above all, be a way to prove to the world that the nation is competitive. “It is a big status symbol in biology,” he says, “whether it’s a need or not.”
Nature 542, 399–400 (23 February 2017) doi:10.1038/nature.2017.21487
Excargodog is offline  
Old 09-16-2020, 10:38 AM
  #28  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,501
Default

Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes View Post
Yes, but still round, like a disk. Bounded by mountains of ice on the edges.
Winner, winner...

Excargodog is offline  
Old 09-16-2020, 10:44 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 644
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah View Post
It absolutely wasn’t the wet market. No animal sold at the market, or that’s native to Wuhan could have fostered the mutation for COVID-19. If it came from nature, then there is an intermediary animal that we haven’t discovered yet, that had to first get it from a bat, then undergo decades of mutations.

It’s important to note that the story it came from nature is the crazy conspiracy, given the facts.
I'll admit I haven't looked into this recently. The last time I did it was for the belief COVID had been spliced with HIV, and it seemed the more level-headed, expert consensus was that the DNA shared between HIV and COVID was common among a lot of viruses and likely a coincidence in the same way that humans share 60% of the same DNA as a banana.

Also, I thought the belief was that the virus jumped from a bat, to an intermediary, to a human. A wet market is the only place in the world where bats, snakes, pangolins, dogs, cats, badgers, wolf pups, porcupines, ducks, etc are kept alive, in cages, in close proximity, in usually unsanitary conditions.

Here's an interesting article on it:
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/...rus-explained/

I'm not refuting your claims, just adding perspective.
Duffman is offline  
Old 09-16-2020, 10:50 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 644
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog View Post
Saying that this comes from a wet market because that would make it the third pandemic to come from a wet market is sort of making a claim beyond the data. Certainly accidental escapes of pathogens from laboratories are frequent enough. We had a discovery of a brand new Ebola variant - fortunately not terribly lethal to humans - 25 years ago right near Dulles airport:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/25-year...bola-outbreak/

But I agree about the non-malicious part.





There were concerns raised about this lab from its inception.

This reminds me of all those times I laughed at the movie 28 Weeks Later because I thought the only way the plot could get pushed forward was with somebody being so incompetent that nobody in real life would ever do that. Now, I'm not so sure.
Duffman is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Hangar Talk
5
10-21-2020 07:15 PM
DLax85
Cargo
6
11-04-2009 06:01 AM
jungle
Money Talk
9
07-20-2009 12:38 PM
detpilot
Foreign
6
06-02-2008 12:21 PM
vagabond
Money Talk
1
10-22-2007 07:15 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices