ALPA email about vaccine
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: MD-11 F/O
Posts: 111
Let me preface, as a healthy male in his late 30s, I have no plan or desire to take a vaccine that causes horrid side effects, all for a pandemic that will naturally end on its own. I do not need lifetime immunity to this.
So it really irks me that ALPA is a bunch of eager beavers to get this approved for us. We have no idea of long term effects of the vaccine. We already know most who take it are sicker than if they caught the actual virus. Multiple participants had 101+ degree fevers with other severe symptoms.
It makes me wonder what their position will be when they decide a year from now to make it mandatory for flight crews.
So it really irks me that ALPA is a bunch of eager beavers to get this approved for us. We have no idea of long term effects of the vaccine. We already know most who take it are sicker than if they caught the actual virus. Multiple participants had 101+ degree fevers with other severe symptoms.
It makes me wonder what their position will be when they decide a year from now to make it mandatory for flight crews.
Man this post has me in a flashback to the Anthrax shot of the late ‘90s. The government forcing a shot of dubious efficacy onto military members. It was a shiite show from beginning to end and ruined a lot of careers (both professionally and medically). Hopefully this round goes smoother....
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2019
Posts: 537
Four People Given the New COVID Vaccine in Clinical Trials Developed Bell’s Palsy
https://www.health.com/condition/infectious-diseases/coronavirus/covid-vaccine-bells-palsyAustralia Drops Promising Covid-19 Vaccine After Volunteers Falsely Tested Positive For HIV
https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2020/12/11/australia-drops-promising-covid-19-vaccine-after-volunteers-falsely-tested-positive-for-hiv/
If you take a vaccine for a disease this mild that was developed this quickly and you don't have serious risk factors you either can't do risk assessment or have a sub room temp IQ
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 534
Four People Given the New COVID Vaccine in Clinical Trials Developed Bell’s Palsy
https://www.health.com/condition/infectious-diseases/coronavirus/covid-vaccine-bells-palsyAustralia Drops Promising Covid-19 Vaccine After Volunteers Falsely Tested Positive For HIV
https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberth...itive-for-hiv/
If you take a vaccine for a disease this mild that was developed this quickly and you don't have serious risk factors you either can't do risk assessment or have a sub room temp IQ
"Bell's palsy is time-limited and patients generally recover quickly—in a matter of weeks," Dr. Hinman says. "On the spectrum of neurologic disease, it is generally not serious, although severe cases can cause permanent facial paralysis."
"I cannot make a direct connection with the vaccine and suspect this is a coincidence," Dr. Hinman says. "The normal incidence of Bell's palsy is roughly 20 people out of 100,000."
Also, imo, it's not that important for Australia to have a vaccine. Their government, unlike ours, very effectively contained covid. At this point, the only hope for our country is the vaccine.
Last edited by Gordie H; 12-12-2020 at 03:10 PM.
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
Four People Given the New COVID Vaccine in Clinical Trials Developed Bell’s Palsy
https://www.health.com/condition/inf...ne-bells-palsy=12pt
None has been established. "I cannot make a direct connection with the vaccine and suspect this is a coincidence," Dr. Hinman says. "The normal incidence of Bell's palsy is roughly 20 people out of 100,000. The Pfizer study examined 38,000 patients, so four cases would be within the normal observed incidence of Bell's palsy."
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2019
Posts: 537
Imagine not reading your own link:
None has been established. "I cannot make a direct connection with the vaccine and suspect this is a coincidence," Dr. Hinman says. "The normal incidence of Bell's palsy is roughly 20 people out of 100,000. The Pfizer study examined 38,000 patients, so four cases would be within the normal observed incidence of Bell's palsy."
None has been established. "I cannot make a direct connection with the vaccine and suspect this is a coincidence," Dr. Hinman says. "The normal incidence of Bell's palsy is roughly 20 people out of 100,000. The Pfizer study examined 38,000 patients, so four cases would be within the normal observed incidence of Bell's palsy."
20 people out of 100,000 in what, a lifetime? How about the rate of 100,000 in the time the study took? I bet it's more like 0. Use your critical thinking instead of listening to some doctor who has vested interest in the success of a study.
#16
I don't know about you, but every time I get a shot I have an undeniable urge to register Windows for about a week.
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 534
Something of concern with the vaccine could show up as time goes on....this isn't it.
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2019
Posts: 537
You referenced the article...lol. The Dr. is saying 20 out of 100,000 regardless of the vaccine would get Bells...so he's saying 4 out of 38K in the study is about what would be expected. The title of the article is clickbait (and irresponsible if us ask me).
Something of concern with the vaccine could show up as time goes on....this isn't it.
Something of concern with the vaccine could show up as time goes on....this isn't it.
So you explain to me the math: 20 of 100,000 is expected to get bells palsy in their LIFETIME. 4 out of 38,000 got it in the course of a study. You don't have to be a doctor to realize that is statistically significant. Sorry if you can't grasp that.
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 534
No, it's not what would be expected. That article is trying to debunk it. You can find different takes on it. I'm not endorsing the article I'm just pointing out what happened.
So you explain to me the math: 20 of 100,000 is expected to get bells palsy in their LIFETIME. 4 out of 38,000 got it in the course of a study. You don't have to be a doctor to realize that is statistically significant. Sorry if you can't grasp that.
So you explain to me the math: 20 of 100,000 is expected to get bells palsy in their LIFETIME. 4 out of 38,000 got it in the course of a study. You don't have to be a doctor to realize that is statistically significant. Sorry if you can't grasp that.
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
No, it's not what would be expected. That article is trying to debunk it. You can find different takes on it. I'm not endorsing the article I'm just pointing out what happened.
So you explain to me the math: 20 of 100,000 is expected to get bells palsy in their LIFETIME. 4 out of 38,000 got it in the course of a study. You don't have to be a doctor to realize that is statistically significant. Sorry if you can't grasp that.
So you explain to me the math: 20 of 100,000 is expected to get bells palsy in their LIFETIME. 4 out of 38,000 got it in the course of a study. You don't have to be a doctor to realize that is statistically significant. Sorry if you can't grasp that.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell...15%20and%2060.
as you say, “sorry if you can’t grasp that.”
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post