Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk > COVID19
ALPA email about vaccine >

ALPA email about vaccine

Search
Notices
COVID19 Pandemic Information and Reports

ALPA email about vaccine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-12-2020, 01:29 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: MD-11 F/O
Posts: 111
Default

Originally Posted by ToddChavez View Post
Let me preface, as a healthy male in his late 30s, I have no plan or desire to take a vaccine that causes horrid side effects, all for a pandemic that will naturally end on its own. I do not need lifetime immunity to this.

So it really irks me that ALPA is a bunch of eager beavers to get this approved for us. We have no idea of long term effects of the vaccine. We already know most who take it are sicker than if they caught the actual virus. Multiple participants had 101+ degree fevers with other severe symptoms.

It makes me wonder what their position will be when they decide a year from now to make it mandatory for flight crews.

Man this post has me in a flashback to the Anthrax shot of the late ‘90s. The government forcing a shot of dubious efficacy onto military members. It was a shiite show from beginning to end and ruined a lot of careers (both professionally and medically). Hopefully this round goes smoother....
decrabbitz is offline  
Old 12-12-2020, 01:48 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2019
Posts: 537
Default

Four People Given the New COVID Vaccine in Clinical Trials Developed Bell’s Palsy

https://www.health.com/condition/infectious-diseases/coronavirus/covid-vaccine-bells-palsy


Australia Drops Promising Covid-19 Vaccine After Volunteers Falsely Tested Positive For HIV
https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2020/12/11/australia-drops-promising-covid-19-vaccine-after-volunteers-falsely-tested-positive-for-hiv/



If you take a vaccine for a disease this mild that was developed this quickly and you don't have serious risk factors you either can't do risk assessment or have a sub room temp IQ
rld1k is offline  
Old 12-12-2020, 02:28 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 534
Default

Originally Posted by rld1k View Post

Four People Given the New COVID Vaccine in Clinical Trials Developed Bell’s Palsy

https://www.health.com/condition/infectious-diseases/coronavirus/covid-vaccine-bells-palsy


Australia Drops Promising Covid-19 Vaccine After Volunteers Falsely Tested Positive For HIV
https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberth...itive-for-hiv/

If you take a vaccine for a disease this mild that was developed this quickly and you don't have serious risk factors you either can't do risk assessment or have a sub room temp IQ
Excerpts from the article you linked:

"Bell's palsy is time-limited and patients generally recover quickly—in a matter of weeks," Dr. Hinman says. "On the spectrum of neurologic disease, it is generally not serious, although severe cases can cause permanent facial paralysis."

"I cannot make a direct connection with the vaccine and suspect this is a coincidence," Dr. Hinman says. "The normal incidence of Bell's palsy is roughly 20 people out of 100,000."


Also, imo, it's not that important for Australia to have a vaccine. Their government, unlike ours, very effectively contained covid. At this point, the only hope for our country is the vaccine.

Last edited by Gordie H; 12-12-2020 at 03:10 PM.
Gordie H is offline  
Old 12-12-2020, 02:42 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
Default

Originally Posted by rld1k View Post

Four People Given the New COVID Vaccine in Clinical Trials Developed Bell’s Palsy

https://www.health.com/condition/inf...ne-bells-palsy

=12pt
Imagine not reading your own link:

None has been established. "I cannot make a direct connection with the vaccine and suspect this is a coincidence," Dr. Hinman says. "The normal incidence of Bell's palsy is roughly 20 people out of 100,000. The Pfizer study examined 38,000 patients, so four cases would be within the normal observed incidence of Bell's palsy."
OOfff is offline  
Old 12-12-2020, 03:27 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2019
Posts: 537
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff View Post
Imagine not reading your own link:

None has been established. "I cannot make a direct connection with the vaccine and suspect this is a coincidence," Dr. Hinman says. "The normal incidence of Bell's palsy is roughly 20 people out of 100,000. The Pfizer study examined 38,000 patients, so four cases would be within the normal observed incidence of Bell's palsy."

20 people out of 100,000 in what, a lifetime? How about the rate of 100,000 in the time the study took? I bet it's more like 0. Use your critical thinking instead of listening to some doctor who has vested interest in the success of a study.
rld1k is offline  
Old 12-12-2020, 03:30 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BrazilBusDriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 337
Default

Originally Posted by Escargot View Post
I'm no expert, but I think that running a fever would be considered a positive biological response. Which, as I understand it, is the whole point of a vaccine. (Besides mind control robots, of course.)
I don't know about you, but every time I get a shot I have an undeniable urge to register Windows for about a week.
BrazilBusDriver is offline  
Old 12-12-2020, 03:38 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 534
Default

Originally Posted by rld1k View Post
20 people out of 100,000 in what, a lifetime? How about the rate of 100,000 in the time the study took? I bet it's more like 0. Use your critical thinking instead of listening to some doctor who has vested interest in the success of a study.
You referenced the article...lol. The Dr. is saying 20 out of 100,000 regardless of the vaccine would get Bells...so he's saying 4 out of 38K in the study is about what would be expected. It also mentions most recover quickly. The title of the article is clickbait (and irresponsible if us ask me).

Something of concern with the vaccine could show up as time goes on....this isn't it.
Gordie H is offline  
Old 12-12-2020, 03:45 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2019
Posts: 537
Default

Originally Posted by Gordie H View Post
You referenced the article...lol. The Dr. is saying 20 out of 100,000 regardless of the vaccine would get Bells...so he's saying 4 out of 38K in the study is about what would be expected. The title of the article is clickbait (and irresponsible if us ask me).

Something of concern with the vaccine could show up as time goes on....this isn't it.
No, it's not what would be expected. That article is trying to debunk it. You can find different takes on it. I'm not endorsing the article I'm just pointing out what happened.

So you explain to me the math: 20 of 100,000 is expected to get bells palsy in their LIFETIME. 4 out of 38,000 got it in the course of a study. You don't have to be a doctor to realize that is statistically significant. Sorry if you can't grasp that.
rld1k is offline  
Old 12-12-2020, 03:52 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 534
Default

Originally Posted by rld1k View Post
No, it's not what would be expected. That article is trying to debunk it. You can find different takes on it. I'm not endorsing the article I'm just pointing out what happened.

So you explain to me the math: 20 of 100,000 is expected to get bells palsy in their LIFETIME. 4 out of 38,000 got it in the course of a study. You don't have to be a doctor to realize that is statistically significant. Sorry if you can't grasp that.
Listen, I'm not convincing you of anything and that's ok. You don't have to take the vaccine anytime soon and honestly I don't have any problem with that right now. But you do acknowledge - if no one takes it, the country is screwed for a long time?
Gordie H is offline  
Old 12-12-2020, 04:01 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
Default

Originally Posted by rld1k View Post
No, it's not what would be expected. That article is trying to debunk it. You can find different takes on it. I'm not endorsing the article I'm just pointing out what happened.

So you explain to me the math: 20 of 100,000 is expected to get bells palsy in their LIFETIME. 4 out of 38,000 got it in the course of a study. You don't have to be a doctor to realize that is statistically significant. Sorry if you can't grasp that.
If you use your critical thinking to actually look up any numbers, it’s 1-4/10,000 per year.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell...15%20and%2060.


as you say, “sorry if you can’t grasp that.”
OOfff is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Birddog
United
236
08-11-2016 07:55 AM
USMCFDX
FedEx
94
07-27-2016 07:14 AM
Aero1900
Frontier
160
04-29-2016 07:56 PM
GW258
Mergers and Acquisitions
270
09-30-2012 07:48 AM
Harry Canyon
Major
106
03-16-2011 07:43 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices