Natural Immunity vs Vaccine:

Reply Subscribe

Page 2 of 83

Last »

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

07-27-2021, 10:08 PM

#11

wrxpilot

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Sep 2008

Position: B767

Posts: 1,901

Quote:

Originally Posted by Excargodog

Care to venture an opinion about the sources that I linked to?

Sure. You made this statement:

Quote:

At the present time, natural immunity is in the lead but that may be only because of the delay between the first people getting infected and the development of the immunizations themselves.

The source you linked to does not support that.

07-28-2021, 06:06 AM

#12

Excargodog

Perennial Reserve

Joined APC: Jan 2018

Posts: 11,501

Quote:

Originally Posted by wrxpilot

Sure. You made this statement:

The source you linked to does not support that.

Actually, if you read them and use a little common sense they do. Those who acquired COVID before there was an immunization against it still have t-cell mediated resistance, just as those who were immunized do. But people were getting COVID for months before immunizations even became available so - as of yet - we know that relative immunity from COVID infection is present for at least six months longer than we know it is present for immunization. Now since neither has waned significantly as of yet, nobody can yet tell which will last longer. Doesn’t prove one will last any longer than the other in the end, but right now one has been going on longer than the other and it’s still going strong.

07-28-2021, 07:15 AM

#13

flightmedic01

Gets Weekends Off

Thread Starter

Joined APC: Jul 2011

Position: Reclining

Posts: 840

Quote:

Originally Posted by wrxpilot

Wow, so you actually think that guy you linked to is legitimate? I’m quite frankly speechless.

I’m not really concerned with whether or not you think he is “legitimate” (even though he has hundreds of scientific people agreeing with most things he purports). I’m more concerned with the fact that the powers at be want to censor his platform for spreading “misinformation”. That is a far worse problem. Hell, Jen Psaiki just said yesterday people need to wear a mask again basically because “we said so”. Who the **** is “we”?!?!

07-28-2021, 08:35 AM

#14

Red Forman

Banned

Joined APC: Jan 2008

Position: Pilot

Posts: 2,625

Quote:

Originally Posted by flightmedic01

To be fair, the people in “charge” were against the vaccine before they were for it.

07-28-2021, 08:42 AM

#15

ZapBrannigan

Furloughed Again?!

Joined APC: Aug 2007

Position: Boeing 737

Posts: 4,796

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

07-28-2021, 08:54 AM

#16

Excargodog

Perennial Reserve

Joined APC: Jan 2018

Posts: 11,501

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZapBrannigan

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Clearly, most vaccines specifically targeted the spike protein both for speed of development and approval as well as in hopes of limiting unneeded reactions to the immunizations. Infection Acquired immunity targets multiple proteins and - theoretically at least - could provide a more robust protection than the more narrowly tailored immunizations. Duration of that protection for either case is currently unknown but may well be longer than initially predicted. For the four common human coronaviruses that merely cause colds in people, infection acquired immunity seems to wane after about 9 months.

07-28-2021, 10:04 AM

#17

Red Forman

Banned

Joined APC: Jan 2008

Position: Pilot

Posts: 2,625

So the study the CDC used to flip flop again on mask mandates didn’t pass peer review and is based on a vaccine used in India that is not approved in the US. But because of “science” even us vaccinated folks have to wear a mask. Anyone who still takes the CDC and Fauci seriously really needs to get their head examined. It’s ok to admit you were wrong and severely duped many, many times over.