Time to stop politicizing Ivermectin
#331
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,236
#334
Banned
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: 3+ hour sit in the ATL
Posts: 1,982
I'm merely providing info that doctors, if certified by the aforementioned boards can now be disciplined for telling a patient of theirs that the jab may not be the best thing for them.
Do you think that is cool?
I don't
There's another country that tells you stuff like this. Its called China.
Next is social credit scores.
I don't know if you ever served, or fought for this country. But this **** is absolutely anethma to our founding. It should make your blood boil.
It took 8 generations to go from "Give me Liberty or Give me Death" to "How many jabs must I take to go to a concert"
Again. This is peak insanity. If you can't see it, then I can't help you or anyone else.
#335
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...-dies-covid-19
I have no idea if he was taking it as directed or not. Nor do I care or have a shred of sympathy for him. Reality is that had he been vaccinated he would still be alive.
I have no idea if he was taking it as directed or not. Nor do I care or have a shred of sympathy for him. Reality is that had he been vaccinated he would still be alive.
#336
Banned
Joined APC: May 2021
Posts: 166
I looked through a few of these snippets, and a lot of this info is unverifiable. “According to social media”, etc etc. dont get me wrong drop tank, I’m pro vax and I see the irony where it’s warranted , but we shouldn’t stoop to the levels of the folks spitting Mis-information for our political gain should we?
#337
Speed, Power, Accuracy
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: PIC
Posts: 1,702
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/healt...tists-n1279938
What are the odds of chemical similarity to the compound that must be ignored/shunned/denigrated? Ironic, isn't it, that Merck owns it?
What are the odds of chemical similarity to the compound that must be ignored/shunned/denigrated? Ironic, isn't it, that Merck owns it?
#338
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/healt...tists-n1279938
What are the odds of chemical similarity to the compound that must be ignored/shunned/denigrated? Ironic, isn't it, that Merck owns it?
What are the odds of chemical similarity to the compound that must be ignored/shunned/denigrated? Ironic, isn't it, that Merck owns it?
Rolled my eyes and quit reading right there. Because they didn't write "Type I" diabetes, we're talking about a 44 year old fatty with Type II.
You'd better believe Merck or their ilk wants to sell her another pill rather than tell her to put the doughnuts down if she wants to live. Because apparently that's impossible, even when staring at a hangman's noose.
She's a nurse, for Jebus sake. She knows (presumably) because SCIENCE tells her daily choices have consequences.
#339
Speed, Power, Accuracy
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: PIC
Posts: 1,702
"At 44 with diabetes and high blood pressure".....
Rolled my eyes and quit reading right there. Because they didn't write "Type I" diabetes, we're talking about a 44 year old fatty with Type II.
You'd better believe Merck or their ilk wants to sell her another pill rather than tell her to put the doughnuts down if she wants to live. Because apparently that's impossible, even when staring at a hangman's noose.
She's a nurse, for Jebus sake. She knows (presumably) because SCIENCE tells her daily choices have consequences.
Rolled my eyes and quit reading right there. Because they didn't write "Type I" diabetes, we're talking about a 44 year old fatty with Type II.
You'd better believe Merck or their ilk wants to sell her another pill rather than tell her to put the doughnuts down if she wants to live. Because apparently that's impossible, even when staring at a hangman's noose.
She's a nurse, for Jebus sake. She knows (presumably) because SCIENCE tells her daily choices have consequences.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post