Time to stop politicizing Ivermectin
09-20-2021, 07:33 AM
#231
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Posts: 1,109
Originally Posted by worstpilotever
I wonder if there are any long term health issues using ivermectin in covid patients. Has that been studied?
So obviously, for long term side effects, somehow it’ll be better to use Pfizer’s version that’s only been used a few hundred times for only 6 months in studies and no other history beyond that…Compared to the cheaper version that’s been used millions of times for over a year with no negative data and overall has been used billions of times for 40 years with no negative data. Yep, that makes perfect sense.
Can you please explain with science or logic how that makes sense? Honest question. Not trying to be sarcastic.
Last edited by Thedude86; 09-20-2021 at 07:56 AM.
09-20-2021, 09:20 AM
#232
Banned
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: 737
Posts: 257
Originally Posted by Thedude86
Not sure but it’s been used 4 billion times in humans in 40 years with the no short term or long term side effects unless you overdose. And even with an overdose it’s only a headache unless you take the horse version. It’s also been used for a year millions of times specifically for Covid, all with success and no side effects.
So obviously, for long term side effects, somehow it’ll be better to use Pfizer’s version that’s only been used a few hundred times for only 6 months in studies and no other history beyond that…Compared to the cheaper version that’s been used millions of times for over a year with no negative data and overall has been used billions of times for 40 years with no negative data. Yep, that makes perfect sense.
Can you please explain with science or logic how that makes sense? Honest question. Not trying to be sarcastic.
So obviously, for long term side effects, somehow it’ll be better to use Pfizer’s version that’s only been used a few hundred times for only 6 months in studies and no other history beyond that…Compared to the cheaper version that’s been used millions of times for over a year with no negative data and overall has been used billions of times for 40 years with no negative data. Yep, that makes perfect sense.
Can you please explain with science or logic how that makes sense? Honest question. Not trying to be sarcastic.
09-20-2021, 12:00 PM
#234
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Head pillow fluffer, Assistant bed maker
Posts: 1,233
Originally Posted by Thedude86
Not sure but it’s been used 4 billion times in humans in 40 years with the no short term or long term side effects unless you overdose. And even with an overdose it’s only a headache unless you take the horse version. It’s also been used for a year millions of times specifically for Covid, all with success and no side effects.
So obviously, for long term side effects, somehow it’ll be better to use Pfizer’s version that’s only been used a few hundred times for only 6 months in studies and no other history beyond that…Compared to the cheaper version that’s been used millions of times for over a year with no negative data and overall has been used billions of times for 40 years with no negative data. Yep, that makes perfect sense.
Can you please explain with science or logic how that makes sense? Honest question. Not trying to be sarcastic.
So obviously, for long term side effects, somehow it’ll be better to use Pfizer’s version that’s only been used a few hundred times for only 6 months in studies and no other history beyond that…Compared to the cheaper version that’s been used millions of times for over a year with no negative data and overall has been used billions of times for 40 years with no negative data. Yep, that makes perfect sense.
Can you please explain with science or logic how that makes sense? Honest question. Not trying to be sarcastic.
09-20-2021, 02:33 PM
#236
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,269
Religious exemption
Originally Posted by Thedude86
Not sure but it’s been used 4 billion times in humans in 40 years with the no short term or long term side effects unless you overdose. And even with an overdose it’s only a headache unless you take the horse version. It’s also been used for a year millions of times specifically for Covid, all with success and no side effects.
So obviously, for long term side effects, somehow it’ll be better to use Pfizer’s version that’s only been used a few hundred times for only 6 months in studies and no other history beyond that…Compared to the cheaper version that’s been used millions of times for over a year with no negative data and overall has been used billions of times for 40 years with no negative data. Yep, that makes perfect sense.
Can you please explain with science or logic how that makes sense? Honest question. Not trying to be sarcastic.
So obviously, for long term side effects, somehow it’ll be better to use Pfizer’s version that’s only been used a few hundred times for only 6 months in studies and no other history beyond that…Compared to the cheaper version that’s been used millions of times for over a year with no negative data and overall has been used billions of times for 40 years with no negative data. Yep, that makes perfect sense.
Can you please explain with science or logic how that makes sense? Honest question. Not trying to be sarcastic.
Only problem with your argument is ivermectin doesn’t work on covid.
09-20-2021, 03:08 PM
#237
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 867
Just make sure you list “ivermectin” on your 8500-8, Block 17a and sign Block 20.
I hereby certify that all statements and answers provided by me on this application form are complete and true to the best of my knowledge, and I agree that they are to be considered part of the basis for issuance of any FAA certificate to me. I have also read and understand the Privacy Act statement that accompanies this form.
09-20-2021, 03:13 PM
#238
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Head pillow fluffer, Assistant bed maker
Posts: 1,233
Originally Posted by Fm0Bm
https://downloads.regulations.gov/CD...tachment_1.pdf
https://www.regulations.gov/document/CDC-2021-0075-0001
Abstract: Analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database can be
used to estimate the number of excess deaths caused by the COVID vaccines. A simple
analysis shows that it is likely that over 150,000 Americans have been killed by the current
COVID vaccines as of Aug 28, 2021.
https://theexpose.uk/2021/09/20/covi...le-in-the-usa/
https://www.regulations.gov/document/CDC-2021-0075-0001
Abstract: Analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database can be
used to estimate the number of excess deaths caused by the COVID vaccines. A simple
analysis shows that it is likely that over 150,000 Americans have been killed by the current
COVID vaccines as of Aug 28, 2021.
https://theexpose.uk/2021/09/20/covi...le-in-the-usa/
09-20-2021, 03:17 PM
#239
Line holder
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: On the bus,seat 0A
Posts: 3,228
Originally Posted by Fm0Bm
https://downloads.regulations.gov/CD...tachment_1.pdf
https://www.regulations.gov/document/CDC-2021-0075-0001
Abstract: Analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database can be
used to estimate the number of excess deaths caused by the COVID vaccines. A simple
analysis shows that it is likely that over 150,000 Americans have been killed by the current
COVID vaccines as of Aug 28, 2021.
https://theexpose.uk/2021/09/20/covi...le-in-the-usa/
https://www.regulations.gov/document/CDC-2021-0075-0001
Abstract: Analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database can be
used to estimate the number of excess deaths caused by the COVID vaccines. A simple
analysis shows that it is likely that over 150,000 Americans have been killed by the current
COVID vaccines as of Aug 28, 2021.
https://theexpose.uk/2021/09/20/covi...le-in-the-usa/
From the article about Norway, 13 people (all old and frail,” who should probably should not have been vaccinated “) died probably due to getting the vaccine. About 3.5 million Norwegians have been vaccinated. If we use that same ratio, about 1 in 270K for the US, it would mean (with 180 million fully vaccinated) about 700 deaths. Even if you use the (ridiculous) under reporting rate of 40, it would be 30K, not 150K. I have zero PHDs, but the math just isn’t there.
09-20-2021, 04:40 PM
#240
Clear ECAM
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 887
Originally Posted by Fm0Bm
https://downloads.regulations.gov/CD...tachment_1.pdf
https://www.regulations.gov/document/CDC-2021-0075-0001
Abstract: Analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database can be
used to estimate the number of excess deaths caused by the COVID vaccines. A simple
analysis shows that it is likely that over 150,000 Americans have been killed by the current
COVID vaccines as of Aug 28, 2021.
https://theexpose.uk/2021/09/20/covi...le-in-the-usa/
https://www.regulations.gov/document/CDC-2021-0075-0001
Abstract: Analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database can be
used to estimate the number of excess deaths caused by the COVID vaccines. A simple
analysis shows that it is likely that over 150,000 Americans have been killed by the current
COVID vaccines as of Aug 28, 2021.
https://theexpose.uk/2021/09/20/covi...le-in-the-usa/
One of the main limitations of VAERS data is that it cannot determine if the vaccine caused the reported adverse event. This limitation has caused confusion in the publicly available data from VAERS WONDER, specifically regarding the number of reported deaths. There have been instances where people have misinterpreted reports of deaths following vaccination as deaths caused by the vaccines; that is not accurate. VAERS accepts all reports of adverse health events following vaccinations without judging whether the vaccine caused the adverse health event. Some reports to VAERS represent true vaccine reactions and others are coincidental adverse health events and not related to vaccination. Overall, a causal relationship cannot be established using information from VAERS report alone.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
