Time to stop politicizing Ivermectin
09-21-2021, 06:13 AM
#251
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Head pillow fluffer, Assistant bed maker
Posts: 1,239
Originally Posted by Flydafe
Surprisingly yes... straight off the NIH website right below Remdesivir
https://www.covid19treatmentguidelin...bles/table-2e/
https://www.covid19treatmentguidelin...bles/table-2e/
09-21-2021, 06:18 AM
#252
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2019
Posts: 429
Originally Posted by worstpilotever
hmmm, I wonder how they have studied it for long term effects when covid has only been around for a couple of years?
09-21-2021, 06:19 AM
#253
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2019
Posts: 429
As much as I love the dialogue.. it’s time to move on from debating ivermectin. The NIH has it listed as a treatment on their website. Even has a link to the clinical trails. Hopefully this will end the back and forth over the subject
https://www.covid19treatmentguidelin...bles/table-2e/
https://www.covid19treatmentguidelin...bles/table-2e/
09-21-2021, 06:45 AM
#254
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Head pillow fluffer, Assistant bed maker
Posts: 1,239
Originally Posted by Flydafe
They haven’t studied the long term effects of the three vaccines so that’s on par with the status quo
09-21-2021, 06:57 AM
#255
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2019
Posts: 429
Originally Posted by worstpilotever
exactly, yet the vaccines work, ivermectin doesn’t. Why are people scared of the vaccine, but not ivermectin? It boggles the mind.
The jabs are new. This is the first time mRNA technology has been administered in mass. Robert Malone the inventor said it should not be used in humans. Also the goal post are always moving. There is no long term data. I guess that adds to the hesitancy
09-21-2021, 07:10 AM
#256
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 694
Originally Posted by worstpilotever
exactly, yet the vaccines work, ivermectin doesn’t. Why are people scared of the vaccine, but not ivermectin? It boggles the mind.
My fave irony is all 50 governors are vaccinated and just about all the big talking heads against the vaccine are as well… or in a “doth protest too much” sort of way, they just won’t say 🤔
09-21-2021, 07:16 AM
#257
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Head pillow fluffer, Assistant bed maker
Posts: 1,239
Originally Posted by Flydafe
As much as I love the dialogue.. it’s time to move on from debating ivermectin. The NIH has it listed as a treatment on their website. Even has a link to the clinical trails. Hopefully this will end the back and forth over the subject
https://www.covid19treatmentguidelin...bles/table-2e/
https://www.covid19treatmentguidelin...bles/table-2e/
look, it would be great if ivermectin worked, but it sure doesn’t seem like it does, there doesn’t seem to be any large, reputable clinical trial that has established its efficacy.
as to your comment about robert Malone, this is an interesting article about him:
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/...keptic/619734/
09-21-2021, 08:08 AM
#258
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 2,380
Originally Posted by worstpilotever
curious, did you actually read the website and some of the trial information, or did you see “ivermectin” and assume it’s been approved? Because the header of the website you supplied reads characteristics of antiviral agents that are approved or under evaluation for covid treatment. I didn’t take the time to look at all the completed trials, but the highest number of people in the studies that I saw was 400. I’m not a doctor so can’t really decipher the results, but with such a small sample size, I can tell you that the studies are next to meaningless.
look, it would be great if ivermectin worked, but it sure doesn’t seem like it does, there doesn’t seem to be any large, reputable clinical trial that has established its efficacy.
as to your comment about robert Malone, this is an interesting article about him:
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/...keptic/619734/
look, it would be great if ivermectin worked, but it sure doesn’t seem like it does, there doesn’t seem to be any large, reputable clinical trial that has established its efficacy.
as to your comment about robert Malone, this is an interesting article about him:
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/...keptic/619734/
09-21-2021, 08:29 AM
#260
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2018
Posts: 511
Originally Posted by Flydafe
Maybe because ivermectin has been in use for 40 years all over the world and the fact that it has won the Nobel Prize in 2005 and in 2015 for various safe and effective medical uses.
The jabs are new. This is the first time mRNA technology has been administered in mass. Robert Malone the inventor said it should not be used in humans. Also the goal post are always moving. There is no long term data. I guess that adds to the hesitancy
The jabs are new. This is the first time mRNA technology has been administered in mass. Robert Malone the inventor said it should not be used in humans. Also the goal post are always moving. There is no long term data. I guess that adds to the hesitancy
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
