|
Originally Posted by 400000Dead
(Post 3306219)
Aww.. nice pivot to more talking points. Vaccines are still 92%+ effective for keeping people out of hospitals, regardless of duration.
I bet you're a 'no condom' guy. They're only 99% effective. https://www.yahoo.com/news/delta-does-not-appear-children-184145095.html Science. Not narrative. |
Originally Posted by DeltaboundRedux
(Post 3305628)
Would be interesting to see just how quickly those BMI's would change if the company were able to mandate "6 months to shape up, or ship out."
Military does a good job with PT and weight standard enforcement. Something about a hanging concentrating the mind wonderfully. |
Originally Posted by Flyfalcons
(Post 3306225)
Except you're talking about transmission in the cockpit, which appears the shot is not doing a good job of. 20% protection from getting the disease, which in turn results in spread. In fact, we now know previously infected do a better job fighting the virus than the vaccinated.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/delta-doe...184145095.html Science. Not narrative. "While a natural infection may induce maturation of antibodies with broader activity than a vaccine does, a natural infection can also kill you," said study leader Michel Nussenzweig of Rockefeller University, in a statement. "A vaccine won't do that and, in fact, protects against the risk of serious illness or death from infection." |
Originally Posted by 400000Dead
(Post 3306245)
From the article YOU posted:
It's really remarkable how you can continue to make a case for something that none of your sources support. |
Originally Posted by Flyfalcons
(Post 3306251)
So explain why vaccinated people still die from the virus. And the vaccine.
|
Originally Posted by 400000Dead
(Post 3306253)
Explain why some girls still get pregnant when using condoms.
|
Originally Posted by Flyfalcons
(Post 3306251)
Additionally, my argument was regarding previously infected people. You weave such a tangled web that you have no idea what you're arguing against.
How will the previously infected prove it? Will they willfully submit to testing when asked? Who will pay for that testing since it is about 20x-30x the cost of a vaccine? And that doesn't even account for the infrastructure and manpower costs needed for mass antibody testing. Why not stick a needle in their arm and be done with it? It's safe and effective, especially if they already had it. You don't live in reality if you think there are viable alternatives to mass vaccination. |
Originally Posted by Flyfalcons
(Post 3306254)
Great, another comparison that has nothing to do with the immune system. Keep 'em coming.
A condom isn't 100% in stopping pregnancies, so to you it's also worthless. |
Originally Posted by Flyfalcons
(Post 3306254)
Great, another comparison that has nothing to do with the immune system. Keep 'em coming.
|
Originally Posted by MIddle3rd
(Post 3306261)
You should try the IGNORE feature. It's fantastic. Only have a few on there. But it improves the quality of the site.
❤️❤️❤️ Feel free to forfeit the debate anytime you like. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:09 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands