DOJ appealing as expected
#32
Gets Weekend Reserve
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,617
Does anyone really and honestly believe that unelected bureaucrats with recently acquired power would just voluntarily give it up? If you do, please let me know as I have some fantastic bridges in the San Francisco Bay Area and NYC to sell to you for a bargain basement price, or some fantastic oceanfront property near Albuquerque.
#33
Banned
Joined APC: Feb 2022
Position: Power Isosceles
Posts: 119
https://news.yahoo.com/united-ceo-very-unlikely-mask-145133089.html
Pleasantly surprised by Mr. Kirby’s candor and his opinion that this DOJ challenge boils down to “appendage measuring” between government agencies (my paraphrase, of course).
Pleasantly surprised by Mr. Kirby’s candor and his opinion that this DOJ challenge boils down to “appendage measuring” between government agencies (my paraphrase, of course).
#34
Notice you don’t hear follow the science from maskers anymore. Now that the science show mask at best made no difference at worse caused more cases it’s crickets. I feel for those still masking it is like their safety blanket, no different from a toddler and his stuff bear. The article below breaks down the studies of two years of masks.
https://www.city-journal.org/the-fai...-mask-mandates
https://www.city-journal.org/the-fai...-mask-mandates
The issue isn't really do they help, because they do at least a tiny, tiny little bit, the issue is whether it's worth it. I've said from day one that it's not.
Masks would actually have a legit impact on spread IF it was implemented as N95 and somehow proper use was enforced (can't imagine how you could accomplish that though). Or painter masks with rubber seals and HEPA filters. But of course that's not happening, so we just do virtue signalling instead.
#35
(And Google censors bad Covid info, so you know this has to be true)
#36
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 112
Preserving the CDC's "authority" to do what?
Mandate behavior as they see fit? Where does it end?
They recommend not eating fully-cooked eggs; they recommend condom use during sex.
The next GOP platform should include de-funding the CDC, if not its outright elimination.
The agency was literally designed/funded/staffed to *prevent* the situation we find ourselves in today.
It failed in doing so, spectacularly. Now it wants it's "authority" to be the law of the land?
Hard pass.
Mandate behavior as they see fit? Where does it end?
They recommend not eating fully-cooked eggs; they recommend condom use during sex.
The next GOP platform should include de-funding the CDC, if not its outright elimination.
The agency was literally designed/funded/staffed to *prevent* the situation we find ourselves in today.
It failed in doing so, spectacularly. Now it wants it's "authority" to be the law of the land?
Hard pass.
#37
The administration is suffering from group-think. They've been captured by the farthest wing of the D party. The mainstream media amplifies their opinions in a positive feedback loop.
They really have no idea what's coming in November because they're simply out of touch.
-- A former D.
They really have no idea what's coming in November because they're simply out of touch.
-- A former D.
#38
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,674
The way I understand it this is not about actually getting us to put the masks back on. This is about establishing the authority of the CDC. Right now they essentially have none and the appeal is about it being on the record that the CDC does in fact have the authority to tell people what to do.
#39
Something the judge did at the request of the government.
Correctly reasoned item not, she did better than you did here.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
newKnow
Mergers and Acquisitions
20
10-30-2008 09:01 AM