Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Legacy Fleet Comparison >

Legacy Fleet Comparison

Search

Notices

Legacy Fleet Comparison

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-12-2017 | 08:05 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Sliceback
25% of AA CA's are on w/b's. Includes 757's. 'Crew age by fleet' as source.

G4% is 16%.

If you're only interested in n/b flying legacy n/b advancement will be faster than at SW.
OK, more recent source one month forecast August 2017, 24apr17:
And yes our 767 groups include the 757, so the percentage would be even lower. APC figure 51 757s.

777/787/330/767/76T CAPT 1389

TTL CAPT. 5888
TTL FO. 7165
______________

TTL PILOTS 13053

WB CA TO TTL = .106 or 10 %

This should be the most accurate data FWIW unless my math is wrong
Reply
Old 05-12-2017 | 08:09 AM
  #32  
Dirtdiver's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
From: 767A
Default

Originally Posted by Gunfighter
Too bad. A career in cargo is more compatible with international widebody flying than any passenger airline. He really should rethink FedEx and UPS.
Wait till he has a year or two dealing with pax, especially post-Dao.
Reply
Old 05-12-2017 | 09:39 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
Except

You will be a first officer forever.

You can only fly the 1960s cockpit 737 Guppy

The cockpit is Loud!

And extremely Small!

Other than that, you make great points.
Don't forget dealing with co workers who think they're musicians/comedians and a safety culture that encourages rushing.
Reply
Old 05-12-2017 | 01:10 PM
  #34  
iaflyer's Avatar
seeing the country...
15 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,004
Likes: 36
From: 73N A
Default

Originally Posted by NikeBuddy
I know the original poster leaned toward long-haul type operations. But, considering the metrics we are talking about ($, profits, downturn, etc), they should consider SWA. 40+ consecutive quarters of profit. Paid a profit sharing check during both 9-11, and the 08-09 meltdown. Never declared bankruptcy, never furloughed a pilot. Great culture. Something to consider.
And an upgrade time that is measured by the decade.
Reply
Old 05-12-2017 | 03:32 PM
  #35  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,864
Likes: 0
From: Left
Default

I am surprised more legacies haven't yet ordered the C-Series besides Delta and Air Canada. Given its efficiency, range versatility and enhanced passenger comfort, I believe it will be a game changer...
Reply
Old 05-12-2017 | 03:59 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,823
Likes: 169
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by David Puddy
I am surprised more legacies haven't yet ordered the C-Series besides Delta and Air Canada. Given its efficiency, range versatility and enhanced passenger comfort, I believe it will be a game changer...
Its still very much a risk. UA passed on them recently because BA/AB came hard to the paint and looked the other way while they shoplifted some 73s and 320s. Its hard for smaller companies to compete with mega companies and their devastating loss leaders. Canadair had to make a VERY lucrative deal, which is great because everyone loves a deal, but let's not fool ourselves. Its still unproven (Swiss and Baltic aren't close to enough) and we could end up with some orphaned hyper electronic Fokkers not far down the road.

Or it could do everything it promised and they stick around. If that's the case, everyone else will order it as well, so any advantage is minor and temporary. There is no magic airplane. Anyone remember when JB was going to dominate the industry by launching the mighty E190?
Reply
Old 05-12-2017 | 04:19 PM
  #37  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,864
Likes: 0
From: Left
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
Its still very much a risk. UA passed on them recently because BA/AB came hard to the paint and looked the other way while they shoplifted some 73s and 320s. Its hard for smaller companies to compete with mega companies and their devastating loss leaders. Canadair had to make a VERY lucrative deal, which is great because everyone loves a deal, but let's not fool ourselves. Its still unproven (Swiss and Baltic aren't close to enough) and we could end up with some orphaned hyper electronic Fokkers not far down the road.

Or it could do everything it promised and they stick around. If that's the case, everyone else will order it as well, so any advantage is minor and temporary. There is no magic airplane. Anyone remember when JB was going to dominate the industry by launching the mighty E190?
I agree that Bombardier needs to get more airframes out there. Swiss will get its first CS300 soon to add to its CS100s and Korean will get the first of seven CS300s due this year shortly.

Not seeing them fly in North America currently does not help marketing efforts...
Reply
Old 05-12-2017 | 04:33 PM
  #38  
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,252
Likes: 95
From: DAL 330
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
Its still very much a risk. UA passed on them recently because BA/AB came hard to the paint and looked the other way while they shoplifted some 73s and 320s. Its hard for smaller companies to compete with mega companies and their devastating loss leaders. Canadair had to make a VERY lucrative deal, which is great because everyone loves a deal, but let's not fool ourselves. Its still unproven (Swiss and Baltic aren't close to enough) and we could end up with some orphaned hyper electronic Fokkers not far down the road.

Or it could do everything it promised and they stick around. If that's the case, everyone else will order it as well, so any advantage is minor and temporary. There is no magic airplane. Anyone remember when JB was going to dominate the industry by launching the mighty E190?
Well if it is a game changer and we lock up the order book for a few years we can easily get a 5 year "minor and temporary" advantage. I'll take that.

I am looking forward to see some of the new long and thin routes we can make work out of LAX - any guesses?

LAX - BDL
LAX- PVD

Probably make some of the seasonal/Past flights LAX into year round

LAX-PHL
LAX-IND
LAX-Anywhere in FL.

The possibilities are numerous.

Scoop
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hoss
American
111
09-07-2016 06:13 AM
Albief15
Cargo
17
08-31-2014 05:45 AM
EWRflyr
United
44
04-26-2014 05:07 AM
UAL T38 Phlyer
United
16
01-16-2014 01:31 PM
trent890
Regional
24
01-30-2009 05:42 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices