![]() |
Originally Posted by PNWFlyer
(Post 2386409)
There is a reason for that. Pressurization differential pressure maximum is 9.4 psid, so the cabin altitude is only 6000 feet when at 43,000 feet. That is a big difference, especially if you are a frequent flyer.. or a 60+ year old pilot.
|
Originally Posted by Phuz
(Post 2386605)
Plus no bleed air. Using electrical air compression *might* be less harmful to one's health.
|
Nothing like the dirty gym sock smell of the 727.
|
CTE to football players has been proven. We subject ourselves to a multitude of threats in a career.
|
Aren't you guys getting the 350? It looks nicer than the 787..doubt it will be doing much if any domestic? Just curious why Delta bought a bunch of those if their business plan is to retract (give away to JV) international flying?
|
Originally Posted by C130driver
(Post 2386855)
Aren't you guys getting the 350? It looks nicer than the 787..doubt it will be doing much if any domestic? Just curious why Delta bought a bunch of those if their business plan is to retract (give away to JV) international flying?
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2386953)
They bought the aircraft because the JV they hoped to set up with China was planned to end up with 15 to 16 flights a day on Delta metal to China modeled after the AMS hub. That JV has so far not worked out so the forcus has shifted to Korea. The A330-900 is 50 million cheaper than the A350. A350 orders are being cutback to only 15. The A330-900 will be the big fleet.
When do they start arriving? Looks like 2019. Any idea if they will be moved up in light of the deferred 350s? |
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 2386977)
When do they start arriving? Looks like 2019.
Any idea if they will be moved up in light of the deferred 350s? |
Originally Posted by PNWFlyer
(Post 2386038)
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/sfpMxLhf7MQ/maxresdefault.jpg
and the second one just replaced a 767 flight from Seattle to London. |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 2387162)
Uses 737 nosewheel?
|
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 2387289)
Probably same overhead too :D
OTOH, The 737 Max 10 just sold like hotcakes in Paris. Apparently, every airline management group has no idea what the difference is between 1960 and 2017. |
I see the -10 stands on it's tippy-toes for T.O. The MLG extends 9" for rotation clearance..... What could go wrong?:rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by badflaps
(Post 2387318)
I see the -10 stands on it's tippy-toes for T.O. The MLG extends 9" for rotation clearance..... What could go wrong?:rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2386953)
A350 orders are being cutback to only 15.
|
Originally Posted by badflaps
(Post 2387318)
I see the -10 stands on it's tippy-toes for T.O. The MLG extends 9" for rotation clearance..... What could go wrong?:rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 2387372)
That is not official. 350 orders are still at 25, however it is likely that 10 of those will be converted to 339s due to said korean vice china hub issue.
|
Originally Posted by crewdawg
(Post 2387477)
Even more of a reason to get the 330/764 banded with the 777/350.
|
Now back to the -90 going away. What's this week's version of that?
|
Originally Posted by Flying Monkey
(Post 2387716)
Now back to the -90 going away. What's this week's version of that?
"Delta Air Lines has pulled its first Boeing MD-90 from service, as it prepares to begin a three-year drawdown of its MD-88 fleet. The aircraft (MSN 53382) was withdrawn from service on 23 June, Flight Fleets Analyzer shows and a spokesman for the Atlanta-based carrier confirms. The aircraft had 58,772 cycles and 31,998 hours at the end of 2016. The MD-90 was one of the first two delivered to launch customer Delta on 24 March 1995, the database shows." |
Originally Posted by flyallnite
(Post 2387414)
Oh man... I wonder where they're gonna put the big light bulb that comes on if it's broken?
|
Originally Posted by Planetrain
(Post 2387775)
June 27, 2017 from flightglobal.com
"Delta Air Lines has pulled its first Boeing MD-90 from service, as it prepares to begin a three-year drawdown of its MD-88 fleet. The aircraft (MSN 53382) was withdrawn from service on 23 June, Flight Fleets Analyzer shows and a spokesman for the Atlanta-based carrier confirms. The aircraft had 58,772 cycles and 31,998 hours at the end of 2016. The MD-90 was one of the first two delivered to launch customer Delta on 24 March 1995, the database shows." |
Originally Posted by crewdawg
(Post 2387477)
Even more of a reason to get the 330/764 banded with the 777/350.
C2019 is the perfect time to make this happen along with 5:15 vacation, training and min day. |
Originally Posted by FMGEC
(Post 2387795)
Wait- What?!? So it AVERAGED a 1/2 hour flight leg? Am I reading that right?
|
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 2387808)
If it has 2 aisles it should pay 777/350 rates. Like American and United.
C2019 is the perfect time to make this happen along with 5:15 vacation, training and min day. See how easy that was. :cool: |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2386953)
They bought the aircraft because the JV they hoped to set up with China was planned to end up with 15 to 16 flights a day on Delta metal to China modeled after the AMS hub. That JV has so far not worked out so the forcus has shifted to Korea. The A330-900 is 50 million cheaper than the A350. A350 orders are being cutback to only 15. The A330-900 will be the big fleet.
|
Originally Posted by n9810f
(Post 2388009)
Sounds pretty ******* clumsy. This isn't Africa we're trying to work - it's only the #1 market in the world and we're 1) giving up our nook at Tokyo and 2) now onto another attempt to work with someone in Korean.
That was the same thing KAL wanted a few years back that led to a pullback in that relationship. Fortunently for us they bought a shipping company that is dragging them down and they came back to the table hat in hand. |
Originally Posted by qball
(Post 2384062)
The cockpit will be referred to as the Thunder Dome
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2388074)
We did not give up our nook in Tokyo, it is dead and buried by better aircraft and a very crafty move by the Japanese to open up Haneda to international flights. China has not worked out because our potential partner wants all the Pacific flying with us doing zero.
That was the same thing KAL wanted a few years back that led to a pullback in that relationship. Fortunently for us they bought a shipping company that is dragging them down and they came back to the table hat in hand. Or do you think no airline will? Clueless. |
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 2388096)
Take the time to see who fills the routes we are abandoning in Narita.
Or do you think no airline will? Clueless. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2388097)
If they are profitable why would we drop them? RA was anything but a fool when it came to route planning and as he stated many times each route needed to pull its weight. Next time you are in ATL for training walk over to the Marketing area and talk with the folks running Asia. I suspect you might find it enlighting and you might actually be surprised at how competent they actually are.
|
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 2388117)
Gzsg walking into Delta Marketing to speak his knowledge of airline economics is similar to what we'll see soon when McGregor walks into the ring with Mayweather to show his boxing skills.
Mic drop right there. HMV for an -88 is $4M. Apparently a HMV for a -90 is $22,000,000. It's a bunch of $ to pay for already depreciated, older, less efficient aircraft in a much smaller category. Sending them to the desert kinda makes sense but my degree was in marketing. |
Originally Posted by CheapTrick
(Post 2388259)
Mic drop right there.
HMV for an -88 is $4M. Apparently a HMV for a -90 is $22,000,000. It's a bunch of $ to pay for already depreciated, older, less efficient aircraft in a much smaller category. Sending them to the desert kinda makes sense but my degree was in marketing. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2388097)
If they are profitable why would we drop them? RA was anything but a fool when it came to route planning and as he stated many times each route needed to pull its weight. Next time you are in ATL for training walk over to the Marketing area and talk with the folks running Asia. I suspect you might find it enlighting and you might actually be surprised at how competent they actually are.
|
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 2388315)
So a JV partner can do the flying.
|
Sailing
Let me ask you where you stood as management was marching to over 800 regional jets? Did you parrot their words about how they would feed the wide bodies? I think we can all agree management was severely wrong and ****ed away billions. How much did Delta pay for Comair? You remember Comair don't you? There are 18 nonstops between Korea and the U.S. We fly 3. Korean flies 15. And the 80 cities beyond Korea? We fly none. Keep repeating management's talking points. |
|
Sailing what was the ROI on the Comair purchase?
Yeah baby, they know how to make money. "The RJs are saving our bacon!!!" |
Jerry, how long ago was that, and under which mgmt team's watch?
Sent from my SM-G900T3 using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 2388328)
Sailing
Let me ask you where you stood as management was marching to over 800 regional jets? Did you parrot their words about how they would feed the wide bodies? I think we can all agree management was severely wrong and ****ed away billions. How much did Delta pay for Comair? You remember Comair don't you? There are 18 nonstops between Korea and the U.S. We fly 3. Korean flies 15. And the 80 cities beyond Korea? We fly none. Keep repeating management's talking points. |
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 2388328)
We fly 3. Korean flies 15.
And the 80 cities beyond Korea? We fly none. 1) Is it JV "US-Korea" only + codeshare beyond? Or 2) is it JV on all Korean airlines destinations? Big, big difference between the two. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:56 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands