International up 22.1%
09-07-2017 | 07:14 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Racketeer
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,339
Likes: 829
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
International up 22.1%
Aeromexico updates on traffic
Look who's international expansion is going great. 22.1% YOY. Good for them.
https://seekingalpha.com/news/329415...pdates-traffic
Aeromexico, El Al Israel Airlines launch codeshare | Airports & Routes content from ATWOnline
AeroMexico replaces Delta on Guadalajara ? Salt Lake City route from 1Q18 :: Routesonline
Look who's international expansion is going great. 22.1% YOY. Good for them.
https://seekingalpha.com/news/329415...pdates-traffic
Aeromexico, El Al Israel Airlines launch codeshare | Airports & Routes content from ATWOnline
AeroMexico replaces Delta on Guadalajara ? Salt Lake City route from 1Q18 :: Routesonline
09-07-2017 | 07:53 AM
#3
Thread Starter
Racketeer
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,339
Likes: 829
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
BTW, GOL is getting new 737maxs with increased range to do FL to Brazil routes.
http://ri.voegol.com.br/download_arq...3-0EED4761C4C8
http://ri.voegol.com.br/download_arq...3-0EED4761C4C8
09-07-2017 | 03:03 PM
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,906
Likes: 0
From: Here and there
09-08-2017 | 01:28 PM
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
The "no monetization" framework I see is that with outsourcing, our level of higher paying international flying, and the associated salaries decline (the numerator in the individual PS equation), while the total salary pool of eligible salaries (the denominator) shrinks slightly less, but the profit stays the same, assuming just a transfer of flying (no growth). That's just slightly less PS for us, maybe not enough to notice.
With monetization, .... (here's where you explain or correct the above, please).
09-08-2017 | 01:43 PM
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 6,568
Likes: 317
From: Sitting SC at the Five Towns
Can you help me out and explain the connection here, and give an example so that I can pass on the logic to those I fly with?
The "no monetization" framework I see is that with outsourcing, our level of higher paying international flying, and the associated salaries decline (the numerator in the individual PS equation), while the total salary pool of eligible salaries (the denominator) shrinks slightly less, but the profit stays the same, assuming just a transfer of flying (no growth). That's just slightly less PS for us, maybe not enough to notice.
With monetization, .... (here's where you explain or correct the above, please).
The "no monetization" framework I see is that with outsourcing, our level of higher paying international flying, and the associated salaries decline (the numerator in the individual PS equation), while the total salary pool of eligible salaries (the denominator) shrinks slightly less, but the profit stays the same, assuming just a transfer of flying (no growth). That's just slightly less PS for us, maybe not enough to notice.
With monetization, .... (here's where you explain or correct the above, please).
There's reason there was a backlash against this.
09-08-2017 | 01:56 PM
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,201
Likes: 266
We have a bunch of 350s, and 330neos coming. Pilot with 10 months seniority holds NYC765B, 1.5 years holds DTW330B and 2.5 years holds LAX777B. Even the DTW350B went significantly more junior than anyone thought. I just don't see the "we're a narrowbody airline" angst. Things are really going to get rolling when the new international terminal in Seattle opens giving Delta the capacity to revitalize the Pacific Network.
09-08-2017 | 02:10 PM
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 1
without 'monitization' ps remains and will always be in addition to pay rates.
paid as equity holders in the business.
with 'monitization', ps is absorbed into pay rates, likely to never be reestablished. and wages are always paid as labor, with no equity position in the business.
pay rates can evaporate with the stroke of a pen. with no 'automatic' recovery resulting from improving economic performance.
idk why the benefit of this arrangement is any longer a point of debate.
paid as equity holders in the business.
with 'monitization', ps is absorbed into pay rates, likely to never be reestablished. and wages are always paid as labor, with no equity position in the business.
pay rates can evaporate with the stroke of a pen. with no 'automatic' recovery resulting from improving economic performance.
idk why the benefit of this arrangement is any longer a point of debate.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
