Search
Notices

06 nov ae

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-09-2017, 07:45 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Default

20 years too late?

Ya, thats about par for the dalpa course.

After the 96 contract where management, with dalpas agreement, reniged on the contractually provided retirement benefits for a substantial part of our list....at least a few people woke up to what what was being shoveled.

The mpp was far from adequate or even prudent as a retirement vehicle. But at least it wasnt entirely foolish.

Idk how anyone could have experienced the last amendment process and not come away with a significant attitude of scepticism about what we are fed as line pilots....and about how much faith we should place in any guarantees or statement of certainty issued by agents of our cba.

As my old man used to tell me...use your head. Its not just there as a hat rack.

Last edited by BobZ; 11-09-2017 at 07:57 AM.
BobZ is offline  
Old 11-09-2017, 08:09 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Default

You know swap with friends was also touted as a qol improvement.

Maybe. But when it was turned on in my category every month the open time mysteriously evaporated. Investigating revealed the swap with friends was being used to trip park...raid open time...and then unpark the original trip.

This allowed 100+ hour months to be flown at straight pay.

In a IBT shop...that could cost you a kneecap. At a minimum it diluted the value of the craft. And it certainly abrogated senority and economically damaged all pilots.

So appearing at a lec meeting...evidence in hand...the dalpa scheduling expert who was of late on the negotiating committee....declared 'aw, that cant happen.'

Uhhh...it did and was.

Base trades may be worth a probationary trial. But to do so discounting there will be unintended consequences and/or abuses is to repeat our mistakes.
BobZ is offline  
Old 11-09-2017, 08:35 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Big ones
Posts: 708
Default

Yes. There’s a reason we can’t swap trips on the swap board with other bases either.
tripled is offline  
Old 11-09-2017, 08:39 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by BobZ View Post
You know swap with friends was also touted as a qol improvement.

Maybe. But when it was turned on in my category every month the open time mysteriously evaporated. Investigating revealed the swap with friends was being used to trip park...raid open time...and then unpark the original trip.

This allowed 100+ hour months to be flown at straight pay.

In a IBT shop...that could cost you a kneecap. At a minimum it diluted the value of the craft. And it certainly abrogated senority and economically damaged all pilots.

So appearing at a lec meeting...evidence in hand...the dalpa scheduling expert who was of late on the negotiating committee....declared 'aw, that cant happen.'

Uhhh...it did and was.

Base trades may be worth a probationary trial. But to do so discounting there will be unintended consequences and/or abuses is to repeat our mistakes.
Bob and I don't agree on many things but his post is spot on. The swap board cost us jobs. Lots of them!
sailingfun is offline  
Old 11-09-2017, 09:26 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Left seat of a little plane
Posts: 2,397
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
Bob and I don't agree on many things but his post is spot on. The swap board cost us jobs. Lots of them!
I don't agree with swapping base to base, but I find the current setup, which now has restrictions to prevent the trip parking nonsense, to be very good.

It's just another tool to increase pilot flexibility in a busy world, just like other tools we have. I've already picked up two trips, and dropped one for November via the Swapboard. I've also dropped two trips via PCS personal drops, leaving me currently at 52 hrs.

So long as there are sufficient restrictions to ensure that the swap board is just another tool, and not a vehicle for buddies making an "end around" of the contract I like it.

Sent from my SM-G900T3 using Tapatalk
Herkflyr is offline  
Old 11-09-2017, 09:43 AM
  #46  
Super Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,868
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr View Post
I don't agree with swapping base to base, but I find the current setup, which now has restrictions to prevent the trip parking nonsense, to be very good.

It's just another tool to increase pilot flexibility in a busy world, just like other tools we have. I've already picked up two trips, and dropped one for November via the Swapboard. I've also dropped two trips via PCS personal drops, leaving me currently at 52 hrs.

So long as there are sufficient restrictions to ensure that the swap board is just another tool, and not a vehicle for buddies making an "end around" of the contract I like it.

Sent from my SM-G900T3 using Tapatalk


Has trip parking indeed been restricted? Or was it just made more difficult with a few extra steps thrown in?



Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Old 11-09-2017, 09:46 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Left seat of a little plane
Posts: 2,397
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop View Post
Has trip parking indeed been restricted? Or was it just made more difficult with a few extra steps thrown in?



Scoop
To be honest I don't know. I never parked before so wasn't too dialed in there. I know that there were some restrictions placed due to the complaints (appropriately so). I don't know the exact details and I'm sure that some have figured out how to skirt them.

Sent from my SM-G900T3 using Tapatalk
Herkflyr is offline  
Old 11-09-2017, 09:57 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: 73na
Posts: 286
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop View Post
Has trip parking indeed been restricted? Or was it just made more difficult with a few extra steps thrown in?



Scoop
Has definately been made more difficult. A trip that you drop via Pilot-Pilot swap can only come back to the original pilot's schedule through a PCS run.
Omar 111 is offline  
Old 11-09-2017, 10:16 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Default

Parking was/is the lesser of the problem.

No firewall to schedule projections above montly maximums was the most corrosive issue.
BobZ is offline  
Old 11-09-2017, 06:35 PM
  #50  
Coverage Award...
 
LumberJack's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 1,305
Default

Originally Posted by Go Cards go View Post
I realize that. You bid vacation based on your category as of January 31st. So take a swap to NYC for January and then swap back out once vacation bidding is done. Of course you’re less likely to do that if you’ll have to wait for an AE to bid back out.
I don't think you understood.

With base swaps you lose your awarded vacation weeks and pick from what's available in the new base. With the previous system, if you swapped into a base during the bidding process, you wait till it's over and then choose from the leftovers. You can't bring vacations with you.

Where is the slippery slope here? If it is somehow being abused, add restrictions or get rid of it.
LumberJack is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DLax85
Cargo
33
11-11-2014 09:24 AM
7576FO
American
27
11-07-2012 10:34 AM
misterwl
American
36
11-04-2012 01:02 PM
Tar Heel
Hiring News
1
11-07-2009 05:00 AM
miker1369
Major
4
11-24-2006 12:55 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices