Search
Notices

06 nov ae

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-09-2017, 06:36 PM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunfighter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,459
Default

The seniority impact of base swaps, whether temporary or permanent is neutral. All of these glass half empty posts ignore the opposite side of the issue. If a senior pilot comes into a category and moves pilots down a number, it is offset by the pilots in the previous category who just moved up.
Gunfighter is offline  
Old 11-09-2017, 06:40 PM
  #52  
Coverage Award...
 
LumberJack's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 1,305
Default

Originally Posted by BobZ View Post
Base trades may be worth a probationary trial. But to do so discounting there will be unintended consequences and/or abuses is to repeat our mistakes.
I completely agree. Trial and error is the only way we improve!
LumberJack is offline  
Old 11-09-2017, 06:40 PM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Default

That is gona be a tuff sell to the pilots in the moving down category.

It might not be just one swap. What if its 5. Or 10?
BobZ is offline  
Old 11-09-2017, 06:51 PM
  #54  
Coverage Award...
 
LumberJack's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 1,305
Default

Originally Posted by BobZ View Post
That is gona be a tuff sell to the pilots in the moving down category.

It might not be just one swap. What if its 5. Or 10?
And an easy sell to the pilots in the moving up category... that's seniority...

You have to remember that not everyone is trading into you're base above you. In fact, most of the churn occurs below the 2 year mark so you likely wouldn't be affected at all.

And if you are impacted positively or negatively, it's no different than what would have happened on an AE.
LumberJack is offline  
Old 11-10-2017, 05:06 AM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 381
Default

Originally Posted by LumberJack View Post
I don't think you understood.

With base swaps you lose your awarded vacation weeks and pick from what's available in the new base. With the previous system, if you swapped into a base during the bidding process, you wait till it's over and then choose from the leftovers. You can't bring vacations with you.

Where is the slippery slope here? If it is somehow being abused, add restrictions or get rid of it.
Under the current system you take vacations with you on a base swap. You may have to rebid if you have training that conflicts with a previously awarded vacation but that wouldn’t be the case here. I can’t say I’m necessarily against base swaps but I can see why some people would be.
Go Cards go is offline  
Old 11-10-2017, 05:41 AM
  #56  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Are base swaps actually being proposed or is this just an internet idea?
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 11-10-2017, 05:44 AM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Default

Umm...just to clarify....does the swap include the house and wife?
BobZ is offline  
Old 11-10-2017, 05:57 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,504
Default

Originally Posted by LumberJack View Post
I don't think you understood.

With base swaps you lose your awarded vacation weeks and pick from what's available in the new base. With the previous system, if you swapped into a base during the bidding process, you wait till it's over and then choose from the leftovers. You can't bring vacations with you.

Where is the slippery slope here? If it is somehow being abused, add restrictions or get rid of it.
pretty sure you only lose your vacation for an airline swap. base swaps you keep it.
tunes is offline  
Old 11-10-2017, 06:11 AM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Default

The terminology here is not precise enough.

Swap conjures one pilot trading what he has to another pilot for what HE has.

Thats a real slippery slope.

A non-training AE run semi annual or yearly is pretty firm ground. As with any other AE issues like training and vacation are already addressed.

The AE process would facilitate multiple moves among bases instead of a 1-4-1 swap between 2 pilots.
BobZ is offline  
Old 11-10-2017, 06:28 AM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,909
Default

Originally Posted by BobZ View Post
The terminology here is not precise enough.

Swap conjures one pilot trading what he has to another pilot for what HE has.

Thats a real slippery slope.

A non-training AE run semi annual or yearly is pretty firm ground. As with any other AE issues like training and vacation are already addressed.

The AE process would facilitate multiple moves among bases instead of a 1-4-1 swap between 2 pilots.
Good points. I assumed this was what we've been talking about all along but now I see the distinction. I don't support swaps, but I do support (monthly) opportunities to move bases with everyone having a seniority-based opportunity bid for the base they want. It would probably be a pretty complex piece of software to run the iterative movements, but surely nothing our IT couldn't handle, right?
TED74 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DLax85
Cargo
33
11-11-2014 09:24 AM
7576FO
American
27
11-07-2012 10:34 AM
misterwl
American
36
11-04-2012 01:02 PM
Tar Heel
Hiring News
1
11-07-2009 05:00 AM
miker1369
Major
4
11-24-2006 12:55 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices