Search
Notices

DL/Virgin Flying

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-19-2019, 09:45 PM
  #11  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Delta Gear Slinger
Posts: 415
Default

Originally Posted by The Rover View Post
Not exactly sure what you're referencing. The DALPA Scope matters page says that since the inception of the Virgin Atlantic JV that our block hours between the U.S. and the U.K. are almost flat while Virgins has grown by 33%.

Delta also owns 49% of Virgin Atlantic, so DAL keeps most of the profits.

This gets addressed in the next TA or I'll vote no.

Scope............

Nothing else matters.
This is somewhat disingenuous rhetoric by ALPA.

Yes, Virgin has added capacity across the Atlantic, but what ALPA doesn’t tell you is that VS has grown very little and has simply shifted flying from other markets to North America in support of the JV. The block hours their pilot group operates has been nearly flat since Delta purchased our 49% stake. I have a few contacts that fly over there and we discuss these issues occasionally.

That said, I’m in full support of comprehensive JV scope. I just felt compelled to call out ALPA’s slanted messaging.
RamenNoodles is offline  
Old 08-19-2019, 11:58 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Denny Crane's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Kickin’ Back
Posts: 6,971
Default

Originally Posted by RamenNoodles View Post
This is somewhat disingenuous rhetoric by ALPA.

Yes, Virgin has added capacity across the Atlantic, but what ALPA doesn’t tell you is that VS has grown very little and has simply shifted flying from other markets to North America in support of the JV. The block hours their pilot group operates has been nearly flat since Delta purchased our 49% stake. I have a few contacts that fly over there and we discuss these issues occasionally.

That said, I’m in full support of comprehensive JV scope. I just felt compelled to call out ALPA’s slanted messaging.
I disagree with you. I don’t think it’s disingenuous of Dalpa. We shouldn’t give a rats *** about Virgin Atlantic’s total flying. We, Dalpa, are only concerned with the JV flying and they have added significantly to it while we have not.

Where their additional JV block hours come from (new planes or shifting equipment) doesn’t really matter. Again, we should only be concerned about JV hours.

Denny
Denny Crane is offline  
Old 08-20-2019, 02:41 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,909
Default

"US-UK growth has gone almost exclusively to Virgin, and Delta now flies fewer flights between London LHR and New York JFK than it did before the JV."

Delta pilots could not care, because...[finish this sentence].

Until someone can tell me why I shouldn't care, I do. And since my job and other American jobs matter, I'm glad the MEC is petitioning those involved with Blue Skies approval.
TED74 is offline  
Old 08-20-2019, 04:36 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2018
Posts: 151
Default

Originally Posted by The Rover View Post
Not exactly sure what you're referencing. The DALPA Scope matters page says that since the inception of the Virgin Atlantic JV that our block hours between the U.S. and the U.K. are almost flat while Virgins has grown by 33%.

Delta also owns 49% of Virgin Atlantic, so DAL keeps most of the profits.

This gets addressed in the next TA or I'll vote no.

Scope............

Nothing else matters.
Same here .. scope and QOL is my main concern on this contract.
Cosa Nostra is offline  
Old 08-20-2019, 06:09 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 325
Default

Originally Posted by TED74 View Post
...or go the other way (or do both), and break down how much a pilot takes home from each JV's profit sharing/loss segment. I have no idea if Virgin nets me $5, $50 or $500 a year. Surely it's less than a GS, right?
Last year they said the Aeromexico JV netted each pilot something like $2.50 in profit sharing.

I know this thread is about the Atlantic but that number made me realize that a JV doesn't increase my bank account by as much as operating one of those flights once in a year.
DELTAFO is offline  
Old 08-20-2019, 06:18 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,641
Default

JVs provide domestic feed too. Without those international flights, we wouldn’t have as many domestic ones, nor the domestic captains and first officers that fly them. The value to pilots is more than just profit sharing.

Nonetheless, we need equitable growth going forward with Aeromexico, Korean, and the rest. +Scope on this next contract
Planetrain is offline  
Old 08-20-2019, 07:07 AM
  #17  
Line Holder
 
The Rover's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2019
Position: Right seat of a big Boeing
Posts: 77
Default

Seems that most of our Scope language deals with minimum amounts of flying performed. We need language that deals with how growth will be split up. Seems that should of been codified when said JV was signed, oh well.......

Lets fix that Sh!t now!
The Rover is offline  
Old 08-20-2019, 09:53 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Denny Crane's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Kickin’ Back
Posts: 6,971
Default

Originally Posted by The Rover View Post
Seems that most of our Scope language deals with minimum amounts of flying performed. We need language that deals with how growth will be split up. Seems that should of been codified when said JV was signed, oh well.......

Lets fix that Sh!t now!
Agreed. I think the solution should contain at least 2 metrics, block hours and easks.

Denny
Denny Crane is offline  
Old 08-20-2019, 10:26 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
spaaks's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 869
Default

Originally Posted by TED74 View Post
...or go the other way (or do both), and break down how much a pilot takes home from each JV's profit sharing/loss segment. I have no idea if Virgin nets me $5, $50 or $500 a year. Surely it's less than a GS, right?
it's certainly less than the paycheck you would be getting if Delta had more widebody's of its own and you were on that instead of a narrow body.... Food for thought, UA has SFO 777 FO's at like 8 months on their latest vacancy award. $174/hr 2nd yr pay, $204/hr 3rd yr pay
spaaks is offline  
Old 08-20-2019, 12:18 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by spaaks View Post
it's certainly less than the paycheck you would be getting if Delta had more widebody's of its own and you were on that instead of a narrow body.... Food for thought, UA has SFO 777 FO's at like 8 months on their latest vacancy award. $174/hr 2nd yr pay, $204/hr 3rd yr pay
You need to look across the entire list. As a example what does a Delta 757 pay verses a UAL757. You also need to factor in how much lower are profit sharing would be with UAL’s fleet mix.
sailingfun is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
boog123
Delta
6
07-14-2016 11:26 AM
Seggy
Major
94
04-11-2015 10:18 AM
MacGuy2
Cargo
32
07-07-2012 03:51 AM
dd89
Flight Schools and Training
34
08-23-2009 11:08 AM
Kilgore Trout
Part 135
46
06-19-2009 03:35 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices