Search
Notices

DL/Virgin Flying

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-22-2019, 10:54 AM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Denny Crane's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Kickin’ Back
Posts: 6,971
Default

Originally Posted by RamenNoodles View Post
Denny, I understand your point, but you have to look at this from multiple angles.

Do we deserve a fair share of JV flying?

Absolutely.

Agreed

What is a fair share though when you consider that LHR, LGW and MAN are Virgin’s hubs where they own the slots they operate?

This is for our contract to decide.

Is it fair for us to fly 50% of the JV departures from LHR?

If it’s in the contract then yes.

Would it be fair for Air France to come in and fly 50% of the AF/KL/DL departures from ATL?

If we allowed that to happen with our Scope, then yes it would be fair. I might argue we are headed that way via the last contract where we gave up percentage to AF/KLM/Alitalia. What’s our min percentage......46%? Not just Atlanta but overall.

Of course not. Obviously that’s why we need strong JV scope. But why do we argue that we deserve more LHR flying in Virgin’s bread and butter market when we would not want the same done to us?

This is why I think ALPA’s messaging is disingenuous. They make VS pilots look like our enemy and that they are taking over all of our flying. Reality is they have reallocated slots that THEY own and have simply shifted flying. We are infringing more on their flying than vice versa.

Where has Dalpa said the Virgin pilots are the enemy. Nowhere. THAT’s disingenuous. Honest question because I don’t know the answer. Could Virgin have shifted this flying without the JV? If not then we are due our fair share and it doesn’t sound like we have been getting it.

That’s a lot of verbiage to simply say this: we can’t screw other pilot groups if we don’t want other pilot groups to screw us. This isn’t a one way DALPA street were living on.
Regards to your last paragraph. Are you trying to say we would be hosing the Virgin Pilots and they would be furloughed if they weren’t doing this additional flying? I think not. Where was Virgin flying before they moved the flying to the JV? They’d go back and do some of the flying they were doing before. You are bringing an emotional slant to something that is strictly business. I’d expect the Virgin pilots to advocate for what is best for them. Bottom line, whether Virgin pilots do the JV flying or somewhere else that they were doing before the JV, what does it matter to them?

The reason they are doing more of the flying and us less is because of money. They are a cheaper work group and DAL owns 49% of them. What work group do you think DAL wants doing those flight as much as possible? And not just with the Virgin JV!

You are correct, it isn’t a one way street...

Denny
Denny Crane is offline  
Old 08-22-2019, 10:57 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Denny Crane's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Kickin’ Back
Posts: 6,971
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
Can you explain how and at what cost we might acquire a LHR slot to do it on our own? If we were able to get a slot could we operate the additional flight profitably without being able to connect a percentage of the passengers to beyond flights?
We own 49% of Virgin Atlantic........how many slots is that?

Denny
Denny Crane is offline  
Old 08-22-2019, 11:47 AM
  #53  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Delta Gear Slinger
Posts: 415
Default

Denny,

I never said that ALPA explicitly said that Virgin pilots are the enemy, but that’s the message that is being received.

I can’t tell you how many times I’ve landed in Orlando and heard something along the lines of “there’s those Virgin jerks again stealing all of our flying”

....when in fact all of that Orlando flying has always been Virgin’s long before the JV.
RamenNoodles is offline  
Old 08-22-2019, 11:56 AM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Denny Crane's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Kickin’ Back
Posts: 6,971
Default

Originally Posted by RamenNoodles View Post
Denny,

I never said that ALPA explicitly said that Virgin pilots are the enemy, but that’s the message that is being received.

I can’t tell you how many times I’ve landed in Orlando and heard something along the lines of “there’s those Virgin jerks again stealing all of our flying”

....when in fact all of that Orlando flying has always been Virgin’s long before the JV.
Explicitly? Come on. Here is your quote “They make VS pilots look like our enemy and that they are taking over all of our flying.” That’s explicit enough for me.

Hers a question for you. Do you think the Delta Pilots have our fair share of the Virgin JV flying? Obviously I think not.

Denny
Denny Crane is offline  
Old 08-22-2019, 12:07 PM
  #55  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Delta Gear Slinger
Posts: 415
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane View Post
Explicitly? Come on. Here is your quote “They make VS pilots look like our enemy and that they are taking over all of our flying.” That’s explicit enough for me.

Hers a question for you. Do you think the Delta Pilots have our fair share of the Virgin JV flying? Obviously I think not.

Denny
Frankly, yes. We wouldn’t have the amount of flying we currently enjoy in England without the JV with Virgin.

I’d be happy with JV scope that locks our current share.

They have less than 50 planes. How much of that flying do you expect us to take?

With regard to other JV’s, absolutely not.
RamenNoodles is offline  
Old 08-22-2019, 12:38 PM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Denny Crane's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Kickin’ Back
Posts: 6,971
Default

Originally Posted by RamenNoodles View Post
Frankly, yes. We wouldn’t have the amount of flying we currently enjoy in England without the JV with Virgin.

I’d be happy with JV scope that locks our current share.

They have less than 50 planes. How much of that flying do you expect us to take?

With regard to other JV’s, absolutely not.
I would qualify that by saying we wouldn’t have the flying if we didn’t OWN 49% of Virgin.

Come to think of it........isn’t Delta basically negotiating against itself in regards to the JV itself? Makes you wonder.

Gotta go to work!

Denny
Denny Crane is offline  
Old 08-22-2019, 02:15 PM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Trip7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,414
Default

Originally Posted by RamenNoodles View Post
Denny,



I never said that ALPA explicitly said that Virgin pilots are the enemy, but that’s the message that is being received.



I can’t tell you how many times I’ve landed in Orlando and heard something along the lines of “there’s those Virgin jerks again stealing all of our flying”



....when in fact all of that Orlando flying has always been Virgin’s long before the JV.
I've never understood this as well. Many have posted Virgin 747s at MCO on various forums trying to illustrate our loss of Widebody flying. Makes absolutely no sense.

BTW your posts on the Virgin JV have been absolutely spot on. IMO, there won't be clear direction on Scope negotiations until the arbitrator's ruling on the various Scope Grieviences. The key ruling will be the Korean Air Grievience. DALPA says USA-Japan and USA-South Korea flying should be measured separately. Company interprets the scope language measurement as the combined USA-Korea/Japan. Looking forward to the Arbitrator's thoughts.

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
Trip7 is offline  
Old 08-23-2019, 07:33 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7 View Post
Company interprets the scope language measurement as the combined USA-Korea/Japan. Looking forward to the Arbitrator's thoughts.
LOL this isn't the "nutty 9th" where a pre detetmined radical imposes their personal will through clerk spewn fiat. Unless the JV language says they are measured in the collective, then they're not. There's nothing to "interpret" and its not a grey area just because the company wants it to be.
gloopy is offline  
Old 08-23-2019, 11:19 AM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: A330 First Officer
Posts: 1,465
Default

Originally Posted by RamenNoodles View Post
Denny,

I never said that ALPA explicitly said that Virgin pilots are the enemy, but that’s the message that is being received.

I can’t tell you how many times I’ve landed in Orlando and heard something along the lines of “there’s those Virgin jerks again stealing all of our flying”

....when in fact all of that Orlando flying has always been Virgin’s long before the JV.
Um no. Depends on how far you want to go back. Delta used to run the L1011 out of MCO. But that was 30 years ago.
DALMD88FO is offline  
Old 08-23-2019, 03:50 PM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
saturn's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Position: Supreme Allied Commander
Posts: 1,056
Default

Originally Posted by RamenNoodles View Post
Frankly, yes. We wouldn’t have the amount of flying we currently enjoy in England without the JV with Virgin.

I’d be happy with JV scope that locks our current share.

They have less than 50 planes. How much of that flying do you expect us to take?

With regard to other JV’s, absolutely not.
According to our recent management podcast, we used our 49% stake to gain boardroom leverage to move VS widebodies from Asia to the US. It's not just crew costs, but aircraft acquisition costs. VS flying to the rest of the world benefited DL zero since we don't use VS to spoke out LHR/LGW/MAN, etc. The fast & cheap way to build up the US-UK flying; shift VS flying from less profitable Asia to DL hubs. This was neutral growth for VS crews, as it just shifted. And so far for DL crews, we havent fully partaken of the growth that this JV has created.
saturn is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
boog123
Delta
6
07-14-2016 11:26 AM
Seggy
Major
94
04-11-2015 10:18 AM
MacGuy2
Cargo
32
07-07-2012 03:51 AM
dd89
Flight Schools and Training
34
08-23-2009 11:08 AM
Kilgore Trout
Part 135
46
06-19-2009 03:35 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices