Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Scope Committee Pacific Update >

Scope Committee Pacific Update

Search

Notices

Scope Committee Pacific Update

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-10-2019 | 10:44 AM
  #101  
Tailhookah's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 794
Likes: 2
From: Widget Jet
Default

Originally Posted by NavyFlyer
Dude. No one is saying that JV’s are a bad thing. We just want an EQUAL percentage of growth on our big equipment.

If KAL or WestJet buys six 787’s, we should be purchasing 24 of them (we’re 4x their size). We want equal growth (percentage-wise) on big equipment. Help both pilot groups equally (not DISproportionally, as is DAL’s current practice).

How does this not resonate with one of our own!?!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Not apples to apples. Korean might not use those jets on routes we fly or would’ve flown. I do agree JV’s aren’t all bad and that we better get used to them. They’re not going away. We have to have the constitution to make the company adhere to the agreement...aka our PEA. But we’ve not done much. If we all would agree and pull in the same direction and direct our displeasure via legal channels, then we’d be better off.

The last JV violation that we won was a joke and pure chump change. 30 million is a rounding error for Delta. So why do you think they continue to break the agreements?

We need to get tougher as a group and stop ***** footing around these violations.
Reply
Old 09-10-2019 | 12:42 PM
  #102  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,239
Likes: 687
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
Speaking of the benefits of JVs and Westjet, when I was at ASA ATL-YYZ was all RJs year round. A mix or CR7 and CR9s. Now it's all MD88.

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
DCI did BOS-YHZ but now there are no Delta branded flights. Individual routes and gauge changes over a decade are hardly the point. The fluid movement of ownership and leased airplanes through a JV partner and probable equity partner is. JMHO
Reply
Old 09-10-2019 | 01:23 PM
  #103  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,107
Likes: 479
Default

Here's my biggest concern.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the way these JVs are structured in our PWA are all about some type of share of EASKs--either trans-atlantic, trans-pacific, etc. And that's all fine except with WestJet and Aeromexico. If we use the same type of language where (just for example) we get 50% of Canada/US flying, what could (and is) happening is Delta can sell tickets from Denver to China and the flight might go DEN-YVR-PVG with WestJet operating the YVR-PVG leg (and possibly the DEN leg too!). Would that trans-pacific flight even count towards anything seeing as the WestJet/Aeromexico JVs aren't governed under that sort of language?

Also intra US connections can be routed through Canadian airports. Flying CLE-SAN? Book a ticket on Delta and take WestJet from CLE-YYZ-SAN! This type of flying seems easier to address with scope by demanding some sort of equality or ratio of Canada-US flying. The long haul connections through Canada/Mexico seem difficult to protect against though.
Reply
Old 09-10-2019 | 02:16 PM
  #104  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 92
Default

Originally Posted by Tailhookah
We need to get tougher as a group and stop ***** footing around these violations.
I confess not to know all 14k+ pilots. But those I do know give me faith that most of us get it. Trip7 and his ilk are a significant minority IMHO.
Reply
Old 09-10-2019 | 03:03 PM
  #105  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TED74
I confess not to know all 14k+ pilots. But those I do know give me faith that most of us get it. Trip7 and his ilk are a significant minority IMHO.
Trip7 isn't fooling anyone. Everyone I come into contact with is on the same page (and that's not HIS page). Just FYI.
Reply
Old 09-11-2019 | 01:50 AM
  #106  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

[QUOTE=Trip7;2884571]
Originally Posted by gzsg
As someone who went thru some silly trips this summer I agree that the company has gone overboard on the optimizer. Seems every 5 years or so they try to power thru a summer with DL reduced staffing and Greenslips. Then weather shows up

Why are they continuing to redline in October?

Multiple rotations with a deadhead the same day as an ocean crossing.

IMO this significantly lowers our level of safety.

What is the point of this risk taking? Of this pilot pushing?

Does management need to return more billions to the shareholders?

Trip do you agree with this practice?

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 09-11-2019 | 08:20 AM
  #107  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,823
Likes: 169
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
The long haul connections through Canada/Mexico seem difficult to protect against though.
Why is that difficult? No DL (or any affiliated) code unless we get "half" (defined as 55% or more) or the better of block hours or ASM's, whichever is more in our favor, and anything long haul they do counts against any other theatre JV we may have. EZ. Little scrappy WestJet needs DL more than DL needs WestJet. We can partner but they can't get the bigger share especially with the potential for labor arbitrage in the "network."
Reply
Old 09-11-2019 | 08:26 AM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,107
Likes: 479
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
Why is that difficult? No DL (or any affiliated) code unless we get "half" (defined as 55% or more) or the better of block hours or ASM's, whichever is more in our favor, and anything long haul they do counts against any other theatre JV we may have. EZ. Little scrappy WestJet needs DL more than DL needs WestJet. We can partner but they can't get the bigger share especially with the potential for labor arbitrage in the "network."
I agree with you. We need you on the negotiating committee.
Reply
Old 09-11-2019 | 10:06 AM
  #109  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,107
Likes: 479
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
Why is that difficult? No DL (or any affiliated) code unless we get "half" (defined as 55% or more) or the better of block hours or ASM's, whichever is more in our favor, and anything long haul they do counts against any other theatre JV we may have. EZ. Little scrappy WestJet needs DL more than DL needs WestJet. We can partner but they can't get the bigger share especially with the potential for labor arbitrage in the "network."
Would WestJet/Aeromexico trans-atlantic or trans-pacific flights with Delta pax count against theatre JVs currently?
Reply
Old 09-11-2019 | 11:24 AM
  #110  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TED74
I confess not to know all 14k+ pilots. But those I do know give me faith that most of us get it. Trip7 and his ilk are a significant minority IMHO.
This right here.

If they want to keep violating the contract, it's time to make them bleed when they do.

Time to get EXACTLY what we deserve as a pilot group.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turbanpilot
American
1446
12-24-2014 05:31 PM
TANSTAAFL
Major
728
10-30-2013 01:18 PM
YXnot
Major
1077
02-18-2011 09:17 PM
AAflyer
Major
101
03-27-2010 06:39 AM
PEACH
Major
14
11-07-2009 08:20 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices