Search

Notices

Jan. AE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-28-2020 | 06:43 PM
  #681  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 563
Likes: 2
From: Widebelly FO
Default

Originally Posted by Scooter432
AE supposedly comes out tomorrow.. around 150 bypasses is the rumor. MSP 717 pretty junior due to folks with qualifiers. Will be interesting to see the full results.
Interesting, curious to see how low msp 717 actually went
Reply
Old 01-28-2020 | 06:45 PM
  #682  
New Hire
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 798
Likes: 3
From: Concourse A
Default

Originally Posted by weekendflyer
Interesting, curious to see how low msp 717 actually went
yes I’m curious what “junior” means to my bud, but I feel there will be a lot of surprises on this bid from what BS had mentioned.
Reply
Old 01-28-2020 | 07:18 PM
  #683  
Big E 757's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,604
Likes: 12
From: A320 Left seat
Default

Originally Posted by Abouttime2fish
Why is the base with the highest percentage of commuters, have the least percentage of commutable trips (my impression)? Does Delta issue lube with that bid package?

When the ER catagory started flying domestic flying in NYC back in ‘10-‘11, the answer to why do we have so many early departures and late arrivals, (i.e. uncommutable trips) the answer was all the O & D passengers. In other words, because a lot of passengers begin and end their travels there, by virtue of it being the biggest city in the U.S., we have a lot of trips starting and ending at the early and late hours. That’s what I was told.
Reply
Old 01-28-2020 | 08:51 PM
  #684  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Default

LAX has the same problem. Lots of O&D traffic, on the edge of the country. Therefore, lots of early departures and late inbounds. Hence, a lot of poor commutability.
Reply
Old 01-28-2020 | 10:39 PM
  #685  
GogglesPisano's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
20M Airline Miles
10 Years
Gets Weekends Off
50 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 6,536
Likes: 279
From: Sitting SC at the Five Towns
Default

Why can’t those early departures be flown by guys laying over in hotels, who just have to shower and show up in the lobby as opposed to driving hours or commuting in on the own time and sleeping on their own dime?
Reply
Old 01-29-2020 | 02:53 AM
  #686  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: Cirrus CA
Default

Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
Why can’t those early departures be flown by guys laying over in hotels, who just have to shower and show up in the lobby as opposed to driving hours or commuting in on the own time and sleeping on their own dime?


I argued this very point to Bob Smeltzer. Why not have a larger pilot base of said aircraft in ATL, MSP or SEA (where people actually live). Have flights layover in NYC or LA, pay for the added hotel costs, but reduce sick calls and missed j/s’s—especially when weather messes up NYC, and decrease training costs (around $50k a type rating) associated with people jumping off equipment at the first opportunity (NYC 717 or MadDog back in the day). With this, you’d have pilots in place when IROPS occur, thus increasing reliability, while reducing (overall) cost metrics.

But alas, I’m just a pilot. Not management. What would I know?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 01-29-2020 | 03:07 AM
  #687  
RonRicco's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 833
Likes: 5
From: Captain
Default

The NYC commutability thing has been addressed before. The most recent I remember had to do with non NYC pilots flying international trips. In other words “why is ATL flying JFK-XYZ?” CR presented a lot of data about commuters including the distance of their commute and how that affects the operation when there is weather etc.

Along those same lines and I honesty don’t remember if it was in print or the dude from scheduling who used to come down to the lounge for briefings, but the gist was that they did not want pilots trying to commute in to NYC for late morning departures. (At least a in large numbers)

Of course that doesn’t explain the trips that aren’t commutable on either end..
Reply
Old 01-29-2020 | 03:16 AM
  #688  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,125
Likes: 81
Default

I have to believe a minimum day would be a barrier to improving NYC commutability. I'm not for or against it myself (I think there's good and bad, but I don't commute)...I just hope those who want a min calendar day are going in to that discussion with eyes wide open.
Reply
Old 01-29-2020 | 03:16 AM
  #689  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 0
From: A330 First Officer
Default

Originally Posted by NavyFlyer
I argued this very point to Bob Smeltzer. Why not have a larger pilot base of said aircraft in ATL, MSP or SEA (where people actually live). Have flights layover in NYC or LA, pay for the added hotel costs, but reduce sick calls and missed j/s’s—especially when weather messes up NYC, and decrease training costs (around $50k a type rating) associated with people jumping off equipment at the first opportunity (NYC 717 or MadDog back in the day). With this, you’d have pilots in place when IROPS occur, thus increasing reliability, while reducing (overall) cost metrics.

But alas, I’m just a pilot. Not management. What would I know?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
until they having a problem filling the slots in NYC it will always be this way. They truly wouldn’t care if the NYC Capt positions had to be filled in new hire classes as long as they get filled.
Reply
Old 01-29-2020 | 03:51 AM
  #690  
Trip7's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,130
Likes: 185
Default

Originally Posted by NavyFlyer
I argued this very point to Bob Smeltzer. Why not have a larger pilot base of said aircraft in ATL, MSP or SEA (where people actually live). Have flights layover in NYC or LA, pay for the added hotel costs, but reduce sick calls and missed j/s’s—especially when weather messes up NYC, and decrease training costs (around $50k a type rating) associated with people jumping off equipment at the first opportunity (NYC 717 or MadDog back in the day). With this, you’d have pilots in place when IROPS occur, thus increasing reliability, while reducing (overall) cost metrics.

But alas, I’m just a pilot. Not management. What would I know?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
How detailed was your argument? I believe you said you were in management in a former life in another industry. You already know that in the corporate world you have to present a comprehensive Feasibility Report complete with data to analyticaly make your case. If you have the PowerPoint feel free to post the link. Thanks.

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CAL EWR
Safety
54
03-19-2018 03:38 AM
jetliner1526
Frontier
142
09-28-2017 06:22 PM
satpak77
Regional
0
01-01-2015 01:18 PM
iaflyer
Major
38
01-06-2008 05:04 PM
CAL EWR
Regional
1
12-10-2006 08:17 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices