Perspective....
04-04-2020, 10:50 AM
#42
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,419
Originally Posted by Buck Rogers
Can you imagine the posting/furball to come if the company offers an “early out” program outside of DALPA concurrence, that is targeted by BES, not seniority? Seen “sweetheart” deals re retirement in the past. Does anything in the contract prevent something like that? It might not respect seniority but methinks those at the bottom wouldn’t care if they are looking at furlough. That’s how it went down before....divide and conquer. Bottom 1/3 for it to mitigate furloughs, top 1/3 for it because they were hoping it would reach them and if it didn’t, they rapidly move up, then the middle 1/3 throwing the BS flag
FWIW I'm almost positive AAs deal was by BES and age.
-First was by BES, they had to want to reduce manning in your category
-Second was age, all the age 64 folks in your category got a crack at it before any age 63 folks ect...
-Last was by senority only among people your age and in your BES.
AA guys please feel free to correct if I'm wrong
04-04-2020, 11:03 AM
#43
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 78
Originally Posted by Gone Flying
FWIW I'm almost positive AAs deal was by BES and age.
-First was by BES, they had to want to reduce manning in your category
-Second was age, all the age 64 folks in your category got a crack at it before any age 63 folks ect...
-Last was by senority only among people your age and in your BES.
AA guys please feel free to correct if I'm wrong
-First was by BES, they had to want to reduce manning in your category
-Second was age, all the age 64 folks in your category got a crack at it before any age 63 folks ect...
-Last was by senority only among people your age and in your BES.
AA guys please feel free to correct if I'm wrong
It started out as equipment and seat at age 64 then 63....62. However they ended up granting the early retirement to everyone who applied.
04-04-2020, 11:04 AM
#44
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,427
Originally Posted by overqualified52
Isn’t he the same Turd that screwed over 20,000 employees in Pittsburgh? Awesome , state of the Art Terminal that has sat empty for years now . It never did make a comeback . But , I’m not a financial or business guru , but do you guys think that Delta or any of these carriers could be split up ? Or is it just everyone fighting for themselves to survive ? You guys in the forum would know better than I .
04-04-2020, 11:05 AM
#45
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 438
Originally Posted by AUpilot1
It started out as equipment and seat at age 64 then 63....62. However they ended up granting the early retirement to everyone who applied.
By two part bid status (seat/equip), first age 64 in seniority, then 63 in seniority, then 62. Total vacancies determined by company on each fleet.
04-04-2020, 11:08 AM
#46
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,191
Originally Posted by Gone Flying
FWIW I'm almost positive AAs deal was by BES and age.
-First was by BES, they had to want to reduce manning in your category
-Second was age, all the age 64 folks in your category got a crack at it before any age 63 folks ect...
-Last was by senority only among people your age and in your BES.
AA guys please feel free to correct if I'm wrong
-First was by BES, they had to want to reduce manning in your category
-Second was age, all the age 64 folks in your category got a crack at it before any age 63 folks ect...
-Last was by senority only among people your age and in your BES.
AA guys please feel free to correct if I'm wrong
04-04-2020, 11:15 AM
#48
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,191
Originally Posted by 53x11
And to add to my above post, you didn't have to be 62, just in you're 62nd year.
61-62, 62-63, 63-64, 64-65
For perspective, only 10 in their 65th year took the early out, compared to 186 in their 62nd year
61-62, 62-63, 63-64, 64-65
For perspective, only 10 in their 65th year took the early out, compared to 186 in their 62nd year
04-04-2020, 11:16 AM
#49
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 438
Originally Posted by Buck Rogers
Why do you think that is? Do you think it’s that they thought no matter how big the turd is they will be full pay till the last and that is how to maximize income? Or is it a numbers thing, lots more guys 62 with lots of 64 guys already gone? Or could it be the A fund B fund thing and interest rates?
04-04-2020, 11:20 AM
#50
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,419
Originally Posted by Buck Rogers
Why do you think that is? Do you think it’s that they thought no matter how big the turd is they will be full pay till the last and that is how to maximize income? Or is it a numbers thing, lots more guys 62 with lots of 64 guys already gone? Or could it be the A fund B fund thing and interest rates?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
