Notices

Perspective....

Old 04-04-2020 | 10:44 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane
Any chance you’d go for 61.5 and up on your age limit?

Denny
pm sent Denny
Reply
Old 04-04-2020 | 10:50 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 194
From: UNA
Default

Originally Posted by Buck Rogers
Can you imagine the posting/furball to come if the company offers an “early out” program outside of DALPA concurrence, that is targeted by BES, not seniority? Seen “sweetheart” deals re retirement in the past. Does anything in the contract prevent something like that? It might not respect seniority but methinks those at the bottom wouldn’t care if they are looking at furlough. That’s how it went down before....divide and conquer. Bottom 1/3 for it to mitigate furloughs, top 1/3 for it because they were hoping it would reach them and if it didn’t, they rapidly move up, then the middle 1/3 throwing the BS flag

FWIW I'm almost positive AAs deal was by BES and age.

-First was by BES, they had to want to reduce manning in your category
-Second was age, all the age 64 folks in your category got a crack at it before any age 63 folks ect...
-Last was by senority only among people your age and in your BES.

AA guys please feel free to correct if I'm wrong
Reply
Old 04-04-2020 | 11:03 AM
  #43  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Gone Flying
FWIW I'm almost positive AAs deal was by BES and age.

-First was by BES, they had to want to reduce manning in your category
-Second was age, all the age 64 folks in your category got a crack at it before any age 63 folks ect...
-Last was by senority only among people your age and in your BES.

AA guys please feel free to correct if I'm wrong

It started out as equipment and seat at age 64 then 63....62. However they ended up granting the early retirement to everyone who applied.
Reply
Old 04-04-2020 | 11:04 AM
  #44  
Swakid8's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Navy
10 Years
On Reserve
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,922
Likes: 95
Default

Originally Posted by overqualified52
Isn’t he the same Turd that screwed over 20,000 employees in Pittsburgh? Awesome , state of the Art Terminal that has sat empty for years now . It never did make a comeback . But , I’m not a financial or business guru , but do you guys think that Delta or any of these carriers could be split up ? Or is it just everyone fighting for themselves to survive ? You guys in the forum would know better than I .
Negative, that was before Dougie.
Reply
Old 04-04-2020 | 11:05 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by AUpilot1
It started out as equipment and seat at age 64 then 63....62. However they ended up granting the early retirement to everyone who applied.
Correct, my cousin is A330A there and he just texted me this:

By two part bid status (seat/equip), first age 64 in seniority, then 63 in seniority, then 62. Total vacancies determined by company on each fleet.
Reply
Old 04-04-2020 | 11:08 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,576
Likes: 33
Default

Originally Posted by Gone Flying
FWIW I'm almost positive AAs deal was by BES and age.

-First was by BES, they had to want to reduce manning in your category
-Second was age, all the age 64 folks in your category got a crack at it before any age 63 folks ect...
-Last was by senority only among people your age and in your BES.

AA guys please feel free to correct if I'm wrong
Well, from the company standpoint it certainly makes sense, and they would be paying for it. Most things re pilots are seniority based so, I can certainly see a kerfuffle if it’s BES. Just wondering if it would have to have ALPA concurrence or if the company can do an end run. Just laying some prep ground work for anybody that was not here in 96. As I remember that was seniority based to 600 pilots where-by they could add 5years to age and/or years of service to bring them up to a full DB. Got something tickling my noggin that it wasn’t an ALPA contract thing(could be wrong about that) but there is some there there.
Reply
Old 04-04-2020 | 11:09 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Default

And to add to my above post, you didn't have to be 62, just in you're 62nd year.

61-62, 62-63, 63-64, 64-65

For perspective, only 10 in their 65th year took the early out, compared to 186 in their 62nd year
Reply
Old 04-04-2020 | 11:15 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,576
Likes: 33
Default

Originally Posted by 53x11
And to add to my above post, you didn't have to be 62, just in you're 62nd year.

61-62, 62-63, 63-64, 64-65

For perspective, only 10 in their 65th year took the early out, compared to 186 in their 62nd year
Why do you think that is? Do you think it’s that they thought no matter how big the turd is they will be full pay till the last and that is how to maximize income? Or is it a numbers thing, lots more guys 62 with lots of 64 guys already gone? Or could it be the A fund B fund thing and interest rates?
Reply
Old 04-04-2020 | 11:16 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Buck Rogers
Why do you think that is? Do you think it’s that they thought no matter how big the turd is they will be full pay till the last and that is how to maximize income? Or is it a numbers thing, lots more guys 62 with lots of 64 guys already gone? Or could it be the A fund B fund thing and interest rates?
Excellent question Buck
Reply
Old 04-04-2020 | 11:20 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 194
From: UNA
Default

Originally Posted by Buck Rogers
Why do you think that is? Do you think it’s that they thought no matter how big the turd is they will be full pay till the last and that is how to maximize income? Or is it a numbers thing, lots more guys 62 with lots of 64 guys already gone? Or could it be the A fund B fund thing and interest rates?
I'm guessing plenty of 64 year olds, especially those on a WB, think they will get res. gaurentee to not have to fly again. lots more uncertainty for someone with 1-3 years left vs. 6 months
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TonyC
FedEx
161
09-29-2015 03:28 AM
Bill Lumberg
Major
4
06-15-2012 06:50 AM
Sr. Barco
Southwest
44
10-12-2011 07:39 PM
SkyHigh
Hangar Talk
15
04-15-2009 06:07 AM
JoeyMeatballs
Regional
104
01-07-2008 06:09 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices