Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Early Out,Retirement,Furlough Negotiation >

Early Out,Retirement,Furlough Negotiation

Search
Notices

Early Out,Retirement,Furlough Negotiation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-27-2020, 07:48 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Posts: 208
Default

Originally Posted by p3flteng View Post
doesn't his personal history with us tell us we shouldn’t?
And I suspect the cognitive testing required to become a pilot at Delta would preclude any successful pilot candidate from making such a financial blunder.
ApachePhil is offline  
Old 05-27-2020, 07:54 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Posts: 208
Default

Originally Posted by DenverPilot8 View Post
I'm solidly in the furlough group and I'm not expecting early outs to save me AT ALL. The tone of the company's discussions on the subject has been UN-enthusiastic to say the least. I don't know anyone that's expecting a good early out offer from them. The other thing is the fact that the staffing levels for Summer of 2022 already includes all mandatory retirements according to JL from the town hall yesterday. So a guy that is say 63-64 now taking an early out wont change the staffing number at all. Only the guys that are maybe 62-63 taking an early out would have some effect. What is the likely hood of a guy with 3 years to go taking a mediocre early out? slim to none in my mind.
Like you, I don't believe there will be many takers. Probably not enough to preclude many involuntary furloughs.

I'd like for ALPA and the company to come up with a voluntary furlough. Those will, indeed, save jobs. Maybe not many, but 1 for 1, they will save an involuntarily furlough. I know a few guys that would take a voluntary furlough to avoid commuting to a lower paying airplane and especially at concessionary rates. I'd bow out 24 months to avoid that kind of suck.
ApachePhil is offline  
Old 05-27-2020, 08:07 AM
  #33  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 1
Default

WHy everyone is feeling generous, what are we going to do for the Deadzoners who have faithfully served Delta for 30+ years and are forced to leave the company with a substantial cut in standard of living I will venture to say no one will have close to the 60% FAE that was in the contract when they joined Delta and made life long decisions based on our contract, ie, not staying in reserves after 10 1/2 years active and 3 years reserves because that source of retirement was not needed anymore
7ERASEA is offline  
Old 05-27-2020, 08:15 AM
  #34  
Cloudbase
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 717A
Posts: 532
Default

Originally Posted by 7ERASEA View Post
WHy everyone is feeling generous, what are we going to do for the Deadzoners who have faithfully served Delta for 30+ years and are forced to leave the company with a substantial cut in standard of living I will venture to say no one will have close to the 60% FAE that was in the contract when they joined Delta and made life long decisions based on our contract, ie, not staying in reserves after 10 1/2 years active and 3 years reserves because that source of retirement was not needed anymore
We'll let you keep your seat until retirement, provided you're senior enough to hold it while others are out of work.

In all seriousness, has ANYONE ever retired from an aviation career that had zero hiccups, slowdowns, pay cuts, etc? We're hourly shift work. It's a gig that lasts a career, if we're lucky. DZ'ers aren't as unique as they like to think.
GliderCFI is offline  
Old 05-27-2020, 08:17 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Posts: 208
Default

Originally Posted by 7ERASEA View Post
WHy everyone is feeling generous, what are we going to do for the Deadzoners who have faithfully served Delta for 30+ years and are forced to leave the company with a substantial cut in standard of living I will venture to say no one will have close to the 60% FAE that was in the contract when they joined Delta and made life long decisions based on our contract, ie, not staying in reserves after 10 1/2 years active and 3 years reserves because that source of retirement was not needed anymore
So. Detla is to blame for you getting out of the reserves at 13.5 years? If so, who is to blame for those that stayed in the guard/reserves?

I suspect you regret the consequences of getting out, and somehow, in your mind, Delta is to blame?! Using this event to re-litigate precious events tells me everything I need to know.
ApachePhil is offline  
Old 05-27-2020, 08:20 AM
  #36  
Cloudbase
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 717A
Posts: 532
Default

It's also his first post. Pretty good DZ impersonation though if trolling. Points for that.
GliderCFI is offline  
Old 05-27-2020, 08:26 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Schwanker's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,226
Default

Originally Posted by 7ERASEA View Post
WHy everyone is feeling generous, what are we going to do for the Deadzoners who have faithfully served Delta for 30+ years and are forced to leave the company with a substantial cut in standard of living I will venture to say no one will have close to the 60% FAE that was in the contract when they joined Delta and made life long decisions based on our contract, ie, not staying in reserves after 10 1/2 years active and 3 years reserves because that source of retirement was not needed anymore
Still waiting for previous furloughees to be made whole. Lost retirement, Zero income/DC contributions for 5+ years, followed by years of Bankruptcy contract. Lots of people here have a story to tell.
Schwanker is offline  
Old 05-27-2020, 08:32 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Position: Here and there
Posts: 1,906
Default

I’m owed a unicorn. It’s Delta’s fault if I never get one.
WhiskeyDelta is offline  
Old 05-27-2020, 08:40 AM
  #39  
Super Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,868
Default

Originally Posted by ApachePhil View Post
Like you, I don't believe there will be many takers. Probably not enough to preclude many involuntary furloughs.

I'd like for ALPA and the company to come up with a voluntary furlough. Those will, indeed, save jobs. Maybe not many, but 1 for 1, they will save an involuntarily furlough. I know a few guys that would take a voluntary furlough to avoid commuting to a lower paying airplane and especially at concessionary rates. I'd bow out 24 months to avoid that kind of suck.

Isn't the unpaid LOA basically a voluntary furlough? Not sure what benefits go along with it but perhaps they could be sweetened up a little.

Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Old 05-27-2020, 08:42 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Default

As may perhaps be the case now, there are pilots who joined the industry over the years with an erroneous perception of its stability and security.

This is an unstable industry. It historically has only been a marginally profitable industry. It is a capital, labor, and energy intensive activity.

Since the 1950s it should have been apparent to all that employer owned pension plans had a high risk and record of failure, and at their core... And at scale, are economically unsustainable models.

Further airline specific examples should have made the stark reality unavoidable. WAL. EAL. PANAM. CONTINENTAL. TWA.

As a new hire delta pilot 30+ years ago in regards to the pension...I asked the dalpa indoc guy if he was saying what exists now is going to exist in 30 years....in the airline business? The affirmative answer informed me it was in my best interest to never listen to anything else he had to say.

The south pension was a ponzi. It was never real. In the tradition of pulling up the ladder, the pre '72 pilots who signed everybody after them up for the deal.....built in a trap door to protect themselves.

The unqualified component was accounted for as an operating expense by delta....and for us it amounted to nothing more than an iou in a paper sack from some faceless ceo 30 years down the road.

Stupid. There were pilots who saw the danger. Voices were raised. With WAL and PANAM pilots joining the fold we even had personal accounts of the looming disaster of a pension plan.

With the '96 contract the company admitted it could not afford to pay the negotiated pension benefits. Yet it took another decade, and bankruptcy for this group to act.

We were the crew and pax on the 'unsinkable' pension ship.....heading straight for the iceberg.

It would have taken a Captain and crew to admit to the pax....the ship really isnt unsinkable. And on top of that.... we also dont have enough lifeboats if the unsinkable ship should sink.

Imho dalpa leadership viewed telling the pilots the pension was an at risk and a failed economic model as popular as politicians telling voters we are broke and raising your taxes.

Meanwhile management parlayed pilots attachment and faith in a ponzi into a 2x4 to beat us up with every amendment to our contract.
BobZ is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bender
Delta
405
04-19-2020 08:09 AM
L'il J.Seinfeld
Cargo
72
11-01-2011 02:55 PM
fr8rcaptain
Cargo
0
05-12-2009 03:20 PM
brownie
Cargo
200
03-05-2009 07:55 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices