Search

Notices

1721

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-21-2020 | 04:29 PM
  #221  
FangsF15's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,225
Likes: 1,194
Default

Originally Posted by hvydvr
10 years after your wings and bubbas frequently get nailed with events within a couple of years that extend them....PCS ADSC, requal ADSC, etc. By the time it’s all said and done, unless someone gets a massive Palace Chase waiver, dudes are rolling out at 12-13 yrs....35 years old makes sense now.
FWIW, you can’t be forced to take an ADSC extension for PCS, requal, promotion, etc. You can decline orders and get out after UPT commitment if that’s what you want to do. They may still PCS you, but it won’t come with the normal ADSC extension. Palace Chase waivers during the 14-20 hiring wave were plentiful, though not guaranteed.

Having said that, one would have to know they wanted out to turn down orders, as it also generates a separation date, but until COVID hit, that was happening a fair amount where I was at that time (along with PC waivers).

Also, UPT ADSC has been 10 years for a looong time. Mine was 8 back in the 90’s, and when I was an Blue jet IP in the early 2000’s it had gone to 10, IIRC. I had heard talk they were considering making it 15 to addresss the shortage at one point, but stopped caring quite a few years back.
Reply
Old 09-21-2020 | 05:11 PM
  #222  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 814
Likes: 27
From: Wind checker
Default

“FWIW, you can’t be forced to take an ADSC extension for PCS, requal, promotion, etc. You can decline orders and get out after UPT commitment if that’s what you want to do. They may still PCS you, but it won’t come with the normal ADSC extension. Palace Chase waivers during the 14-20 hiring wave were plentiful, though not guaranteed.”

I used to be chief of mobility assignments at AFPC in a past life. There are all kinds of ways an individual can screw themselves as they come up on their initial UPT commitment. Guys who are approaching this time now need to understand that if furloughs become a reality, AGR and ART jobs are going to move quickly—I know that many have been filled already in the strat air community, as guys with seniority number head over for some stability. They will likely see PC waivers issued as long as your community is healthy. The “value” of a PC waiver may decrease as available jobs get filled by guys jumping on long-term orders. As usual, some general will confuse the crappy hiring and the resultant awesome retention numbers with his intelligence and think the military has solved their problem. Life goes on.
Reply
Old 09-21-2020 | 05:43 PM
  #223  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 120
From: Big ones
Default

So the military might once again find itself out of phase with the civil aviation hiring trends? Get out of town!
Reply
Old 09-21-2020 | 05:45 PM
  #224  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,558
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DWC CAP10 USAF
Mgmt has said, and MEC confirmed reciept of, a proposal that would mitiage all furloughs, whcih is different that the Vol TA that saves the 220.

I beleive the MEC will be discussing both.
There has been other proposals as well, the only deal that was put into language is the voluntary options.

With the new congressional bill being put forward, I assume “things changed” and the proposal is no longer valid anyways.
Reply
Old 09-21-2020 | 07:17 PM
  #225  
Crown's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 1,176
Likes: 61
From: Not an RJ driver anymore
Default

Originally Posted by Iceberg
With the new congressional bill being put forward, I assume “things changed” and the proposal is no longer valid anyways.
what bill? Not trolling, seriously asking
Reply
Old 09-21-2020 | 07:31 PM
  #226  
beis77's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 638
Likes: 3
From: A330 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Iceberg
There has been other proposals as well, the only deal that was put into language is the voluntary options.

With the new congressional bill being put forward, I assume “things changed” and the proposal is no longer valid anyways.
IMHO it would be silly to toss out a strictly voluntary TA at the finish line because of a Bill that “might” happen. Congress isn’t the most trustworthy lot and we don’t know the terms of the aid they’re proposing. If it’s a grant then I’d hope the company would take it. If it’s just another loan, then that precedent has already been set. We should push forward as if nothing from Congress is approved. Until something actually is approved.
Reply
Old 09-21-2020 | 07:55 PM
  #227  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,558
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by beis77
IMHO it would be silly to toss out a strictly voluntary TA at the finish line because of a Bill that “might” happen. Congress isn’t the most trustworthy lot and we don’t know the terms of the aid they’re proposing. If it’s a grant then I’d hope the company would take it. If it’s just another loan, then that precedent has already been set. We should push forward as if nothing from Congress is approved. Until something actually is approved.
I agree, I think the voluntary measures are going to be approved tomorrow (based on completely nothing because I have no details).

In the second part I was referring to the mitigation proposal that the company slid over the table as late as possible and then using some of their own language against them. Mostly TIC, but some seriousness.
Reply
Old 09-21-2020 | 08:02 PM
  #228  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,558
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Crown
what bill? Not trolling, seriously asking
Two Senators proposed a bill to reallocate $28billion unused funds to airline payrolls to prevent mass layoffs.
Reply
Old 09-22-2020 | 04:21 AM
  #229  
DWC CAP10 USAF's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Air Force
Liked
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 3,987
Likes: 188
From: Looking left
Default

Originally Posted by Crown
what bill? Not trolling, seriously asking
Originally Posted by Iceberg
Two Senators proposed a bill to reallocate $28billion unused funds to airline payrolls to prevent mass layoffs.
Two key GOP senators propose $28 billion in airline assistance to avoid job cuts
Reply
Old 09-22-2020 | 04:25 AM
  #230  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 100
From: Road construction signholder
Default

Originally Posted by boog123
report back with the “we didn’t think they would do that” issues.
Did anyone ever really say that? I think this is an urban legend that the "just vote no, early and often" crowd likes to trot out. And even if it happened--ONCE, maybe--who cares? I don't go through life with rose colored glasses. I DO think that "management would do that." That's why you negotiate good contractual language--so they can't. Then I move on.
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices