NYC C66 First Officer Election
09-24-2021 | 05:07 PM
#58
Banned
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,982
Likes: 0
From: 3+ hour sit in the ATL
Just an update.
I've had interactions with MC over various issues of concern from a dues paying member of the Union in good standing.
As a good thing, I would say he is responsive. However, the content and tone of his message is that of talking to a chief pilot (management).
He has not shown me he's a pilot advocate - yet. One question I asked recently was where he stands when MOU 21-01 runs out. What's he going to advocate? Crickets. I did get boilerplate "DALPA is against mandatory vaccinations". OK, great, but how are you going to protect those of us who are not going to get jabbed AFTER 1 Nov. There is more than one of us. It's not a small number. Again, crickets.
There are other examples, like reserve rules, coverage awards and the litany of things we like to ***** about contract wise. This isn't a regional, where he "served" before. I don't think he has very good grasp of DAL history with the pilot group and our contract evolutions. JM did.
28% turnout, certainly not a mandate. I guess I should expect this from now on.
JMHO.
I've had interactions with MC over various issues of concern from a dues paying member of the Union in good standing.
As a good thing, I would say he is responsive. However, the content and tone of his message is that of talking to a chief pilot (management).
He has not shown me he's a pilot advocate - yet. One question I asked recently was where he stands when MOU 21-01 runs out. What's he going to advocate? Crickets. I did get boilerplate "DALPA is against mandatory vaccinations". OK, great, but how are you going to protect those of us who are not going to get jabbed AFTER 1 Nov. There is more than one of us. It's not a small number. Again, crickets.
There are other examples, like reserve rules, coverage awards and the litany of things we like to ***** about contract wise. This isn't a regional, where he "served" before. I don't think he has very good grasp of DAL history with the pilot group and our contract evolutions. JM did.
28% turnout, certainly not a mandate. I guess I should expect this from now on.
JMHO.
09-24-2021 | 05:43 PM
#59
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,900
Likes: 89
Just an update.
I've had interactions with MC over various issues of concern from a dues paying member of the Union in good standing.
As a good thing, I would say he is responsive. However, the content and tone of his message is that of talking to a chief pilot (management).
He has not shown me he's a pilot advocate - yet. One question I asked recently was where he stands when MOU 21-01 runs out. What's he going to advocate? Crickets. I did get boilerplate "DALPA is against mandatory vaccinations". OK, great, but how are you going to protect those of us who are not going to get jabbed AFTER 1 Nov. There is more than one of us. It's not a small number. Again, crickets.
There are other examples, like reserve rules, coverage awards and the litany of things we like to ***** about contract wise. This isn't a regional, where he "served" before. I don't think he has very good grasp of DAL history with the pilot group and our contract evolutions. JM did.
28% turnout, certainly not a mandate. I guess I should expect this from now on.
JMHO.
I've had interactions with MC over various issues of concern from a dues paying member of the Union in good standing.
As a good thing, I would say he is responsive. However, the content and tone of his message is that of talking to a chief pilot (management).
He has not shown me he's a pilot advocate - yet. One question I asked recently was where he stands when MOU 21-01 runs out. What's he going to advocate? Crickets. I did get boilerplate "DALPA is against mandatory vaccinations". OK, great, but how are you going to protect those of us who are not going to get jabbed AFTER 1 Nov. There is more than one of us. It's not a small number. Again, crickets.
There are other examples, like reserve rules, coverage awards and the litany of things we like to ***** about contract wise. This isn't a regional, where he "served" before. I don't think he has very good grasp of DAL history with the pilot group and our contract evolutions. JM did.
28% turnout, certainly not a mandate. I guess I should expect this from now on.
JMHO.
09-25-2021 | 04:52 AM
#60
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,480
Likes: 1,051
Just an update.
I've had interactions with MC over various issues of concern from a dues paying member of the Union in good standing.
As a good thing, I would say he is responsive. However, the content and tone of his message is that of talking to a chief pilot (management).
He has not shown me he's a pilot advocate - yet. One question I asked recently was where he stands when MOU 21-01 runs out. What's he going to advocate? Crickets. I did get boilerplate "DALPA is against mandatory vaccinations". OK, great, but how are you going to protect those of us who are not going to get jabbed AFTER 1 Nov. There is more than one of us. It's not a small number. Again, crickets.
There are other examples, like reserve rules, coverage awards and the litany of things we like to ***** about contract wise. This isn't a regional, where he "served" before. I don't think he has very good grasp of DAL history with the pilot group and our contract evolutions. JM did.
28% turnout, certainly not a mandate. I guess I should expect this from now on.
JMHO.
I've had interactions with MC over various issues of concern from a dues paying member of the Union in good standing.
As a good thing, I would say he is responsive. However, the content and tone of his message is that of talking to a chief pilot (management).
He has not shown me he's a pilot advocate - yet. One question I asked recently was where he stands when MOU 21-01 runs out. What's he going to advocate? Crickets. I did get boilerplate "DALPA is against mandatory vaccinations". OK, great, but how are you going to protect those of us who are not going to get jabbed AFTER 1 Nov. There is more than one of us. It's not a small number. Again, crickets.
There are other examples, like reserve rules, coverage awards and the litany of things we like to ***** about contract wise. This isn't a regional, where he "served" before. I don't think he has very good grasp of DAL history with the pilot group and our contract evolutions. JM did.
28% turnout, certainly not a mandate. I guess I should expect this from now on.
JMHO.
So what you're saying is you want someone to pander to you and tell you things that are not legally allowed or possible. Also, you're "I'm a dues paying member..." statement is such a bloated and useless comment. We literally all are dues paying and in good standing. It doesn't give you any special treatment from anyone.
It sounds like you went into the interactions either intentionally trying to find things to complain about or "get him" with the intent of smearing him on social media. And, from the sound of it, you have no clue about how unions work within the confines of the RLA. Furthermore, you take no time in demeaning him because of his prior service and association with a "inferior"( regional) airline..
And what on earth do you expect him to say when you complain about reserve rules, etc that JM would say different? You know, other than pander?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
