![]() |
Originally Posted by CBreezy
(Post 3406809)
Wait, what? It absolutely does not and I've gotten paid several times for 23M7 this year alone for the company stopping trip coverage to NOOP and split.
Originally Posted by DWC CAP10 USAF
(Post 3406858)
You might want to go look at LOA 20-04 section 5.B.2.5 where is states "...current offer and/or award call out may be stopped prior to the end of the 12- minute award window. In such event, no pilot will receive pay nor will there be any recovery obligation"
AR pilot is also correct, they can NOOP and split after attempting 1 step of coverage but they can’t stop mid callout and do it without paying a m7 |
Originally Posted by tunes
(Post 3406980)
20-04 allows them to stop the callout if it’s been double covered or the leg has cancelled.
|
Originally Posted by DWC CAP10 USAF
(Post 3407073)
Where is the "double coverage or leg has cancelled" stipulations stated in 20-04, because I can find it.
That’s the best part right? It isn’t, but negotiators notes Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by tunes
(Post 3407100)
That’s the best part right? It isn’t, but negotiators notes
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
GS Calls in 24 hours
Originally Posted by DWC CAP10 USAF
(Post 3407119)
If you are privy to negotiators notes, that great. I, as well as 99% of the rest of the seniority list aren’t, so might want to lead with that next time.
I’m on the scheduling committee so we deal with these almost daily. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by tunes
(Post 3407122)
I’m on the scheduling committee so we deal with these almost daily.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk My only feedback would be that I hope you can see how those of us without access to the background notes came to the conclusion we did because of the language that I quoted in 20-04 that just stated "may stop" with no amplifying info. I can only imagine the fine line there is between trying to keep the language "plain English" and adding so much info that we get into the legaleez space where only the SCOTUS can get to the bottom of it. |
Maybe you fine folks here can answer these questions.
I’m REG this month and RES next. Can I pickup or swap for an open time trip that carries over on top of my LC days? Do carry out days count towards previous or future month’s GS trigger? I also heard recently that you can swap with the pot across bid periods. That’s probably not possible when switching from REG to RES like I am? I couldn’t swap a this month trip for a next month trip when I’m RES? |
Originally Posted by neodd
(Post 3407152)
Maybe you fine folks here can answer these questions.
I’m REG this month and RES next. Can I pickup or swap for an open time trip that carries over on top of my LC days? Do carry out days count towards previous or future month’s GS trigger? I also heard recently that you can swap with the pot across bid periods. That’s probably not possible when switching from REG to RES like I am? I couldn’t swap a this month trip for a next month trip when I’m RES? SwP is allowed between REG to REG months only. |
Originally Posted by neodd
(Post 3407152)
Maybe you fine folks here can answer these questions.
I’m REG this month and RES next. Can I pickup or swap for an open time trip that carries over on top of my LC days? Do carry out days count towards previous or future month’s GS trigger? I also heard recently that you can swap with the pot across bid periods. That’s probably not possible when switching from REG to RES like I am? I couldn’t swap a this month trip for a next month trip when I’m RES? Swap board, no. No GS Trigger for RES, so the days of the rotation that occur on your LC call days would just go toward the RES guaranteee |
Originally Posted by DWC CAP10 USAF
(Post 3407140)
That's awesome that you do and I know I speak on behalf of lots of line pilots that we thank you and SK and all the committee members for all you do for us line pilots.
My only feedback would be that I hope you can see how those of us without access to the background notes came to the conclusion we did because of the language that I quoted in 20-04 that just stated "may stop" with no amplifying info. I can only imagine the fine line there is between trying to keep the language "plain English" and adding so much info that we get into the legaleez space where only the SCOTUS can get to the bottom of it. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:49 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands