Hundreds of cancellations
#601
Ok yeah I see that now. Had always thought it was a continuous lookback. I think it should be!
#602
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: B737 FO
Posts: 664
Its an ATL trip, also need that info to look it up. FYI, before you start any flight duty period, you must look back 168 hours and find 30 hours of rest. What basically makes this trip legal is the fact that it has an early report on the last day and at that moment in time if you go back 168 hours you can find 30 hours rest before the trip starts. Interesting enough if the last day had reported after 1446 base time (EDT in this case) it would not be legal. Nothing prohibiting flying seven days in a row with FAR 117. Just the way the idiots at the FAA wrote it the reg!
Believe me, I know there's nothing prohibiting flying 7 days in a row! I've done 10+ in a row, usually over Thanksgiving or Christmas thanks to 30 hour layovers and being junior (although that has never been one continuous trip like this). That is bad enough, but to be on the road unplanned and non-intl for 7 days is egregious.
Not to mention what I'm sure are multiple blatant PWA violations in coverage to make that monstrosity.
#603
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
There's no way 14,000 line plots can do the forensics on this or to reasonably be expected to even know how to.
Every single coverage and RR needs to be completely forensically reviewed either manually or automatically.
#604
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,101
Agreed. There is no way line pilots can backtrack all the illegal reroutes that go out every single day. ALPA is so swamped with ACE I don't think they can come close to checking all the reroutes. Maybe the next contract needs to simplify things and make any reroute 1.5 pay and a second reroute on the same trip makes the whole rotation 2.5 pay..That would simplify things.
#605
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Position: MD-88 FO
Posts: 1,558
At least they made the seventh day 8:30 of block time! Sheesh.
#606
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,370
Not saying you need to agree with me, but it's a far sight from 9 hours being less fatiguing than 8.
#607
Oh, and contract wide, any company assigned schedule changes that return to base more than four hours from original release becomes a proffer.
#609
Don’t disagree, but getting the company negotiators to agree is another story. Sure you make it easier all around to just have a simple rule like that. For Reg AND Res. Absolutely no reason the company should be able to reroute a Res pilot at will just because they got the trip on their line later than the Reg pilot.
#610
Roll’n Thunder
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: Pilot
Posts: 3,552
This is another area of the contract i think is more complicated than it needs to be. Reroutes are essentially an IA(WC), so let's just treat it as one. Pay protected for the original trip, any changes are paid at 200%. I could see an argument for up to the original block as single pay, but certainly anything over that should be double.
Oh, and contract wide, any company assigned schedule changes that return to base more than four hours from original release becomes a proffer.
Oh, and contract wide, any company assigned schedule changes that return to base more than four hours from original release becomes a proffer.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post