Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Hundreds of cancellations >

Hundreds of cancellations

Search
Notices

Hundreds of cancellations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-03-2022, 08:58 AM
  #601  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ChazzMMichaels's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Position: Doggie Style
Posts: 586
Default

Originally Posted by Gone Flying View Post
FAR117.25(b)

Before beginning any reserve or flight duty period a flightcrew member must be given at least 30 consecutive hours free from all duty within the past 168 consecutive hour period.
Ok yeah I see that now. Had always thought it was a continuous lookback. I think it should be!
ChazzMMichaels is offline  
Old 06-03-2022, 09:08 AM
  #602  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: B737 FO
Posts: 664
Default

Originally Posted by blue vortex View Post
Its an ATL trip, also need that info to look it up. FYI, before you start any flight duty period, you must look back 168 hours and find 30 hours of rest. What basically makes this trip legal is the fact that it has an early report on the last day and at that moment in time if you go back 168 hours you can find 30 hours rest before the trip starts. Interesting enough if the last day had reported after 1446 base time (EDT in this case) it would not be legal. Nothing prohibiting flying seven days in a row with FAR 117. Just the way the idiots at the FAA wrote it the reg!
Oops, sorry forgot to include it was ATL. Wow, guess I didn't look closely enough at the times there. I can't believe they made that work and that it's legal.

Believe me, I know there's nothing prohibiting flying 7 days in a row! I've done 10+ in a row, usually over Thanksgiving or Christmas thanks to 30 hour layovers and being junior (although that has never been one continuous trip like this). That is bad enough, but to be on the road unplanned and non-intl for 7 days is egregious.

Not to mention what I'm sure are multiple blatant PWA violations in coverage to make that monstrosity.
BlueSkies is offline  
Old 06-03-2022, 09:52 AM
  #603  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

Originally Posted by 3 green View Post
Yes any open time known about more than 14 hours out has to go through the trip coverage ladder before a reroute is allowed. (the whole ladder) At least this is my understanding. If that's true, that one rotation should get several guys pay protected.
This.

There's no way 14,000 line plots can do the forensics on this or to reasonably be expected to even know how to.

Every single coverage and RR needs to be completely forensically reviewed either manually or automatically.
gloopy is offline  
Old 06-03-2022, 10:14 AM
  #604  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,101
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy View Post
This.

There's no way 14,000 line plots can do the forensics on this or to reasonably be expected to even know how to.

Every single coverage and RR needs to be completely forensically reviewed either manually or automatically.
Agreed. There is no way line pilots can backtrack all the illegal reroutes that go out every single day. ALPA is so swamped with ACE I don't think they can come close to checking all the reroutes. Maybe the next contract needs to simplify things and make any reroute 1.5 pay and a second reroute on the same trip makes the whole rotation 2.5 pay..That would simplify things.
3 green is offline  
Old 06-03-2022, 07:54 PM
  #605  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Position: MD-88 FO
Posts: 1,558
Default

Originally Posted by BlueSkies View Post
Anyone who wants to see a crazy Frankensteined trip look up 3276 on 31MAY. (And no, it's not my trip.) I don't see how that could possibly be legal. 7 days in a row with no 30 hours of rest? And how the heck could someone in CT possibly build this?
At least they made the seventh day 8:30 of block time! Sheesh.
Myfingershurt is offline  
Old 06-03-2022, 11:41 PM
  #606  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,370
Default

Originally Posted by ApachePhil View Post
Not idiots, scientists. Paid for scientists. They also concluded that flying 9 hours a day is less fatiguing than flying 8 hours a day.
I'll take the 9 hrs over "legal to start, legal to finish "

Not saying you need to agree with me, but it's a far sight from 9 hours being less fatiguing than 8.
Baradium is offline  
Old 06-04-2022, 02:28 AM
  #607  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PilotWombat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Position: Currently freeloading
Posts: 524
Default

Originally Posted by 3 green View Post
Maybe the next contract needs to simplify things and make any reroute 1.5 pay and a second reroute on the same trip makes the whole rotation 2.5 pay..That would simplify things.
This is another area of the contract i think is more complicated than it needs to be. Reroutes are essentially an IA(WC), so let's just treat it as one. Pay protected for the original trip, any changes are paid at 200%. I could see an argument for up to the original block as single pay, but certainly anything over that should be double.

Oh, and contract wide, any company assigned schedule changes that return to base more than four hours from original release becomes a proffer.
PilotWombat is offline  
Old 06-04-2022, 03:46 AM
  #608  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Boatbuilder's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: 717a
Posts: 638
Default

RR’s abrogate seniority. You bid it, you got it, you’re supposed to fly it. Anything else should be premium pay.
Boatbuilder is offline  
Old 06-04-2022, 04:11 AM
  #609  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FangsF15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,188
Default

Originally Posted by Boatbuilder View Post
RR’s abrogate seniority. You bid it, you got it, you’re supposed to fly it. Anything else should be premium pay.
Don’t disagree, but getting the company negotiators to agree is another story. Sure you make it easier all around to just have a simple rule like that. For Reg AND Res. Absolutely no reason the company should be able to reroute a Res pilot at will just because they got the trip on their line later than the Reg pilot.
FangsF15 is online now  
Old 06-04-2022, 05:00 AM
  #610  
Roll’n Thunder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: Pilot
Posts: 3,552
Default

Originally Posted by PilotWombat View Post
This is another area of the contract i think is more complicated than it needs to be. Reroutes are essentially an IA(WC), so let's just treat it as one. Pay protected for the original trip, any changes are paid at 200%. I could see an argument for up to the original block as single pay, but certainly anything over that should be double.

Oh, and contract wide, any company assigned schedule changes that return to base more than four hours from original release becomes a proffer.
Just so you know, any GS or IA with conflict does not pay single for the conflicted trip and double for what was flown, both are single pay. So it would be more reasonable to say that any RR flying should pay single pay/credit above your original rotation guarantee.
tennisguru is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
But seriously
Envoy Airlines
15
10-22-2020 02:22 PM
iahflyr
Major
96
03-19-2020 02:01 PM
Gordon C
Major
5
03-22-2006 03:28 PM
Sir James
Hiring News
8
02-20-2006 03:48 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices