Hundreds of cancellations
#561
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Posts: 927
Ok, cool. That wasn't part of my message at all. Point is this will be behind us and we will be on to complaining about something else. We hired 1000 already this year plus what we hired last year and another 2000+ coming in the next 12 months to get us to nearly 16000 on the list.
We will be fine. Breathe.
We will be fine. Breathe.
#562
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,423
I in no way meant this as a defense of any of the numerous bad decisions they have made. Starting with the optimizer in 19.
COVID I give a little slack about but only as far as how far to cut since no one knew how it would play out. HOW they actually cut and the order it was done, however, are definitely issues. Any armchair quarterback can sit back and say what they should have done but no one knew where this was going in 2020. The VEOP was one of the worst things that happened as far as staffing goes and that was touted by ALPA as a big industry win at the time. Perspective and hindsight changes a lot.
COVID I give a little slack about but only as far as how far to cut since no one knew how it would play out. HOW they actually cut and the order it was done, however, are definitely issues. Any armchair quarterback can sit back and say what they should have done but no one knew where this was going in 2020. The VEOP was one of the worst things that happened as far as staffing goes and that was touted by ALPA as a big industry win at the time. Perspective and hindsight changes a lot.
had the September 2020 AE placed all pilots back in a category, trained and ready to go, we would not be having nearly as many problems.
#563
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,423
Roughly 13,900 on the list now (including May hires), if we keep hiring 200/ month til next summer like management says that’s another 2,400. Take out 400-500 planned and early retirements and you get pretty close.
#564
It's about brand image not investors. E = If a company can sell fuel efficiency, which is a core cost and mitigate fuel costs and exposure to volatility, why wouldn't the marketing division exploit this sentiment. S = brand loyalty and interactivity which keeps customers engaged with the brand. G = lobbying, always been done to benefit the corporation or industry. Whether you agree or not it is incorporated in almost all F500s.
"Environment. What kind of impact does a company have on the environment? This can include a company’s carbon footprint, toxic chemicals involved in its manufacturing processes and sustainability efforts that make up its supply chain.
Social. How does the company improve its social impact, both within the company and in the broader community? Social factors include everything from LGBTQ+ equality, racial diversity in both the executive suite and staff overall, and inclusion programs and hiring practices. It even looks at how a company advocates for social good in the wider world, beyond its limited sphere of business.
Governance. How does the company’s board and management drive positive change? Governance includes everything from issues surrounding executive pay to diversity in leadership as well as how well that leadership responds to and interacts with shareholders."
-----
E - Difficult sell for an airline; burning petrol products at high altitudes is our primary business, after all.
S - Explains the DEI hard push; comparatively cheap way to push up the ESG score. Hire a few new positions, issue training memos, do some interviews, fly some flags, issue some pins, etc.
G - Puts some extra qualifiers on who gets leadership and decision making positions. Also, what day-to-day political causes should Delta publicly endorse?
Agree or not, institutional investors are reacting to this ESG score for a variety of reasons. Pretty sure our CEO is well aware of it and has consistently been targeting it for some time. So this has been a focus. (I think)
Is it better than stone cold ruthless capitalism? IDK. Above my paygrade.
#565
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Posts: 208
It's about brand image not investors. E = If a company can sell fuel efficiency, which is a core cost and mitigate fuel costs and exposure to volatility, why wouldn't the marketing division exploit this sentiment. S = brand loyalty and interactivity which keeps customers engaged with the brand. G = lobbying, always been done to benefit the corporation or industry. Whether you agree or not it is incorporated in almost all F500s.
There has been so much liquidity and dumb money floating around, they devised a way to scrape some their way by creating a bogus metric…kinda like when Patrisse Cullors, co-founder of BLM, said they were surprised at the ridiculous money they received being merely white guilt…ESG is essentially the same.
There is no metric in which to measure ESG…the SEC says so themselves…but they are slow to investigate it so as not to be labeled with all the -isms. And as money flows in and out of those very liquid funds, they get a scrape.
#568
Super Moderator
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,873
Really? So Tesla gets bumped down on the ESG score because Elon has gone “rouge” and starts speaking up? ESG is a joke - no firm criteria, all touchy feeling BS. Surely you can not be in favor of this.
If this was legitimate they would publish firm guidelines and the “data” would decide.
Scoop
#569
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Posts: 927
Well first off you said 2000 in the next 12 months and I think that is more likely than 2400 and there are about 440 MANDATORY retirements in the next 12 months. There will likely be closer to 600 -700 or more. The airline typically slows down hiring from November to January so no way I see 2400 in the next 12 months.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post