![]() |
Retro Pay Resolution
AGENDA ITEM # MAKER: Young MOTION #
AI 22-147 29 COMMITTEE # 1 SECOND: Archer VOTE: Passed/Unanimous as Amended by Motion #32 DELTA MASTER EXECUTIVE COUNCIL August 8 – 12, 2022 Boston, MA Proposed Policy Manual Change – Retro Pay 1 WHEREAS the DALMEC currently has no standing policy regarding retro pay, and 2 3 WHEREAS current Section 6 negotiations have extended multiple years beyond the 4 amendable date of our current contract, and 5 6 WHEREAS current economic impacts have resulted in the significant devaluation of pilot 7 wages since the amendable date. 8 9 THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED the DALMEC amends the Policy Manual to establish a 10 commitment to the DALMEC achieving retroactive pay for any Section 6 contract 11 negotiation back to the amendable date. 12 13 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the DALMEC amends the Policy Manual to include the 14 following language: 15 16 “All PWA amendments achieved during Section 6 negotiations will include retroactive 17 pay going back to the amendable date in the event an agreement is delayed beyond that 18 date.” 19 20 21 22 23 24 DRAFTING COMMITTEE RECOMMEDATION: Passed 7 in Favor, 1 Opposed, 0 Abstentions |
Yep, this was passed a few months ago. Good thing. We all applauded it
|
Back Pay sounds even better....
|
Originally Posted by Aligned
(Post 3514247)
Back Pay sounds even better....
|
James Bond was a little confused.
|
Retro is not going to happen. That ship sailed after year two of negotiations.
Focus on some kind of “signing bonus”. Same for everyone? Seat specific? Seniority based? Based on total earnings over negotiations timeframe? Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good. |
Originally Posted by DeltaboundRedux
(Post 3514557)
Retro is not going to happen. That ship sailed after year two of negotiations.
Focus on some kind of “signing bonus”. Same for everyone? Seat specific? Seniority based? Based on total earnings over negotiations timeframe? Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good. |
Originally Posted by DeltaboundRedux
(Post 3514557)
Retro is not going to happen. That ship sailed after year two of negotiations.
Focus on some kind of “signing bonus”. Same for everyone? Seat specific? Seniority based? Based on total earnings over negotiations timeframe? Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good. |
Originally Posted by DeltaboundRedux
(Post 3514557)
Retro is not going to happen. That ship sailed after year two of negotiations.
Focus on some kind of “signing bonus”. Same for everyone? Seat specific? Seniority based? Based on total earnings over negotiations timeframe? Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good. No rewards for sending inexperienced negotiators lacking job knowledge. No rewards for dragging their feet. No rewards for public negotiations and attempting to pit other employee groups against us. Retro is a must as a deterrent to this same BS next negotiation. |
[QUOTE=Iceberg;3514980]Some cruises are long.
No rewards for sending inexperienced negotiators lacking job knowledge. No rewards for dragging their feet. No rewards for public negotiations and attempting to pit other employee groups against us. Retro is a must as a deterrent to this same BS next negotiation.[/QUOTE] The RLA favors management in dragging out negotiations. An IRONCLAD retro policy is the only possible way to offset that. And it needs to be implemented ALPA-wide, profession wide if possible. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:26 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands