Retro Pay Resolution
10-17-2022 | 12:37 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Retro Pay Resolution
AGENDA ITEM # MAKER: Young MOTION #
AI 22-147
29
COMMITTEE # 1
SECOND: Archer
VOTE: Passed/Unanimous as Amended by Motion #32
DELTA MASTER EXECUTIVE COUNCIL August 8 – 12, 2022
Boston, MA
Proposed Policy Manual Change – Retro Pay
1 WHEREAS the DALMEC currently has no standing policy regarding retro pay, and 2
3 WHEREAS current Section 6 negotiations have extended multiple years beyond the
4 amendable date of our current contract, and
5
6 WHEREAS current economic impacts have resulted in the significant devaluation of pilot
7 wages since the amendable date.
8
9 THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED the DALMEC amends the Policy Manual to establish a
10 commitment to the DALMEC achieving retroactive pay for any Section 6 contract
11 negotiation back to the amendable date.
12
13 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the DALMEC amends the Policy Manual to include the
14 following language:
15
16 “All PWA amendments achieved during Section 6 negotiations will include retroactive
17 pay going back to the amendable date in the event an agreement is delayed beyond that
18 date.”
19
20
21
22
23
24 DRAFTING COMMITTEE RECOMMEDATION: Passed 7 in Favor, 1 Opposed, 0 Abstentions
AI 22-147
29
COMMITTEE # 1
SECOND: Archer
VOTE: Passed/Unanimous as Amended by Motion #32
DELTA MASTER EXECUTIVE COUNCIL August 8 – 12, 2022
Boston, MA
Proposed Policy Manual Change – Retro Pay
1 WHEREAS the DALMEC currently has no standing policy regarding retro pay, and 2
3 WHEREAS current Section 6 negotiations have extended multiple years beyond the
4 amendable date of our current contract, and
5
6 WHEREAS current economic impacts have resulted in the significant devaluation of pilot
7 wages since the amendable date.
8
9 THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED the DALMEC amends the Policy Manual to establish a
10 commitment to the DALMEC achieving retroactive pay for any Section 6 contract
11 negotiation back to the amendable date.
12
13 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the DALMEC amends the Policy Manual to include the
14 following language:
15
16 “All PWA amendments achieved during Section 6 negotiations will include retroactive
17 pay going back to the amendable date in the event an agreement is delayed beyond that
18 date.”
19
20
21
22
23
24 DRAFTING COMMITTEE RECOMMEDATION: Passed 7 in Favor, 1 Opposed, 0 Abstentions
10-17-2022 | 06:27 PM
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 2,903
Likes: 158
From: Enoch Powell Enthusiast
Retro is not going to happen. That ship sailed after year two of negotiations.
Focus on some kind of “signing bonus”.
Same for everyone? Seat specific? Seniority based? Based on total earnings over negotiations timeframe?
Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.
Focus on some kind of “signing bonus”.
Same for everyone? Seat specific? Seniority based? Based on total earnings over negotiations timeframe?
Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.
10-17-2022 | 07:43 PM
#7
Line Holder
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 859
Likes: 64
From: 717a
Retro is not going to happen. That ship sailed after year two of negotiations.
Focus on some kind of “signing bonus”.
Same for everyone? Seat specific? Seniority based? Based on total earnings over negotiations timeframe?
Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.
Focus on some kind of “signing bonus”.
Same for everyone? Seat specific? Seniority based? Based on total earnings over negotiations timeframe?
Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.
10-17-2022 | 07:55 PM
#8
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Retro is not going to happen. That ship sailed after year two of negotiations.
Focus on some kind of “signing bonus”.
Same for everyone? Seat specific? Seniority based? Based on total earnings over negotiations timeframe?
Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.
Focus on some kind of “signing bonus”.
Same for everyone? Seat specific? Seniority based? Based on total earnings over negotiations timeframe?
Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.
10-18-2022 | 08:32 AM
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,558
Likes: 0
Retro is not going to happen. That ship sailed after year two of negotiations.
Focus on some kind of “signing bonus”.
Same for everyone? Seat specific? Seniority based? Based on total earnings over negotiations timeframe?
Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.
Focus on some kind of “signing bonus”.
Same for everyone? Seat specific? Seniority based? Based on total earnings over negotiations timeframe?
Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.
No rewards for sending inexperienced negotiators lacking job knowledge. No rewards for dragging their feet. No rewards for public negotiations and attempting to pit other employee groups against us. Retro is a must as a deterrent to this same BS next negotiation.
10-18-2022 | 08:54 AM
#10
Perennial Reserve
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,181
Likes: 237
[QUOTE=Iceberg;3514980]Some cruises are long.
No rewards for sending inexperienced negotiators lacking job knowledge. No rewards for dragging their feet. No rewards for public negotiations and attempting to pit other employee groups against us. Retro is a must as a deterrent to this same BS next negotiation.[/QUOTE]
The RLA favors management in dragging out negotiations. An IRONCLAD retro policy is the only possible way to offset that. And it needs to be implemented ALPA-wide, profession wide if possible.
No rewards for sending inexperienced negotiators lacking job knowledge. No rewards for dragging their feet. No rewards for public negotiations and attempting to pit other employee groups against us. Retro is a must as a deterrent to this same BS next negotiation.[/QUOTE]
The RLA favors management in dragging out negotiations. An IRONCLAD retro policy is the only possible way to offset that. And it needs to be implemented ALPA-wide, profession wide if possible.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
