C066 Update
12-14-2022, 10:29 AM
#121
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Position: 737 A
Posts: 901
Originally Posted by Giordano Bruno
It's interesting how the C66 FO has changed from being on record as hardcore pro-mandate ...to medical freedom poster child.
Pandering to get support from the anti-vax demo. So much for principles.
If he loses the recall, he can always re-apply to be an assistant chief pilot, I guess.
Pandering to get support from the anti-vax demo. So much for principles.
If he loses the recall, he can always re-apply to be an assistant chief pilot, I guess.
12-14-2022, 10:50 AM
#122
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,067
Originally Posted by Giordano Bruno
It's interesting how the C66 FO has changed from being on record as hardcore pro-mandate ...to medical freedom poster child.
Pandering to get support from the anti-vax demo. So much for principles.
If he loses the recall, he can always re-apply to be an assistant chief pilot, I guess.
Pandering to get support from the anti-vax demo. So much for principles.
If he loses the recall, he can always re-apply to be an assistant chief pilot, I guess.
12-14-2022, 11:39 AM
#126
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 838
Originally Posted by Giordano Bruno
It's interesting how the C66 FO has changed from being on record as hardcore pro-mandate ...to medical freedom poster child.
Pandering to get support from the anti-vax demo. So much for principles.
If he loses the recall, he can always re-apply to be an assistant chief pilot, I guess.
Pandering to get support from the anti-vax demo. So much for principles.
If he loses the recall, he can always re-apply to be an assistant chief pilot, I guess.
12-14-2022, 11:45 AM
#128
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,067
Originally Posted by Schwanker
If these numbers are indicative of pro-against AIP, it is an 80-20 pass.
12-14-2022, 11:54 AM
#129
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Position: 737 A
Posts: 901
Originally Posted by CBreezy
I don't think they are related, directly. I think there is a significant amount of people who don't wish to break the wagon right now over this, especially if they would have to just recall him again in 6 months.
about the MEC chair vote and what looks like sour grapes from TK. In my opinion the time for recalls is not now.
For context I was one of the 150 voting against, and I’m very undecided on the AIP. I have gone from lean No to lean Yes and now the 2023 rates are swaying me back toward a No on principle.
12-14-2022, 12:01 PM
#130
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Position: Hoping for any position
Posts: 2,504
Originally Posted by Vsop
I agree. This vote is not related to the AIP. This was all
about the MEC chair vote and what looks like sour grapes from TK. In my opinion the time for recalls is not now.
For context I was one of the 150 voting against, and I’m very undecided on the AIP. I have gone from lean No to lean Yes and now the 2023 rates are swaying me back toward a No on principle.
about the MEC chair vote and what looks like sour grapes from TK. In my opinion the time for recalls is not now.
For context I was one of the 150 voting against, and I’m very undecided on the AIP. I have gone from lean No to lean Yes and now the 2023 rates are swaying me back toward a No on principle.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
