![]() |
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 3599204)
Also I'm not sure why Delta is adamant about a physical signature for the release. Seems like employee number plus password/code via ACARS would be much easier
Also, after having my iPad sleep during cruise, I’m about 50/50 (four legs total) on having to sign back in through Deltanet to access it. Anyone else see this? Meanwhile, the FO on my current rotation can’t get it set up to even load our flights, and that’s after time talking to IT. |
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 3599204)
Also I'm not sure why Delta is adamant about a physical signature for the release. Seems like employee number plus password/code via ACARS would be much easier
Now we all have to drop everything and play patty cake to make this happen. |
Originally Posted by cornbeef007
(Post 3599479)
Exactly…seems like we are going to waste more time with the preflight. It’s going to be an absolute s$&t show trying to get the crew to airdrop it to each other. We usually don’t sign the current release at the same time now, just whenever we get around to it.
Now we all have to drop everything and play patty cake to make this happen. |
Originally Posted by OOfff
(Post 3599482)
just hand one iPad to the other pilot to sign. Way faster and easier than airdropping
|
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 3599406)
Mission + is fine. You just need to learn how to use it. I haven't spent much time on it and I don't have any problems.
|
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 3599406)
Mission + is fine. You just need to learn how to use it. I haven't spent much time on it and I don't have any problems.
|
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 3599406)
Mission + is fine. You just need to learn how to use it. I haven't spent much time on it and I don't have any problems.
kinda like the surface. when all you have know is paper jepps the surface was fine, but when compared to the competition product (iPad) it sucks. |
Can it get us all the required info the paper release provides? Yes. Does it do it more efficiently? No. Is it better than the digital flight plans we’ve been using for the last couple years? Absolutely not. It’s an unintuitive app that wastes our time. You can’t even use the down button to scroll through all the info. It pauses at every section and requires 2 more clicks before you can start using down button again.
I have yet to talk to anyone on the line that thinks it met our expectations yet alone exceeded them. Some guys flat out refuse to use it because they think it’s bad enough that it will never actually get implemented. |
Originally Posted by Gone Flying
(Post 3599500)
having used a product with similar intent at another carrier, I can say I can’t believe how clunky this appears to be. I’ll give it a chance, but so far it seems like a very poor product.
kinda like the surface. when all you have know is paper jepps the surface was fine, but when compared to the competition product (iPad) it sucks. |
Originally Posted by TED74
(Post 3599491)
…with an hour and a half minimum brief time, an hour of cockpit time, three or four total monkeys doing the work of one, one flight leader/purser every two to four days. Something tells me the opinion of the grunts doing three or four legs in the trenches every day carry more weight. But what do I know.
It's coming whether you like it or not. Better learn to use it/love it or your life will continue to be miserable. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:28 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands