DAL to start flight academy
#31
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Posts: 2,189
I think it meets the criteria to be considered cutting the line. They’re seniority list ALPA pilots, on 9E’s seniority list just like all the other 9E folks, subject to the same pay and work rules, but they move to Delta out of seniority. Recently a number of propel pilots were moved to Delta without upgrading and ahead (well ahead) of 9E off the street CJO holders. It doesn’t make propel pilots bad people, but call it what it is. It’s a sweet deal.
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
No matter what an airline does, it's going to have its "one percenters". One day in a suit several years ago IMO doesn't legitimatly screen someone any better than several years of actually doing that job for that company.
I've seen nothing but high quality and great attitudes from every Endeavor (and Compass and Mesaba) flow that I've met. Are there a few who may have some issues or attitudes? Statistically, yeah probably, and I don't refute that possibility. Likewise, are there a few in the other pathway annointed by an "interview" who years later show issues or attitude? Again, statistically that's just as likely. When some isolated examples of that pathway are highlighted, does it invalidate the entire group? Of course not. Neither then should a (very, very) few "bad apples" invalidate those spending years grinding away at our regionals.
Its a lot easier to fake it for a day trying to get the job than to fake it for years actually doing the job.
#33
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2022
Posts: 240
This is a good point, but the interview occurs without any professional flying experience, if any flying experience at all. The propel interview is an interview administered by Delta, but it’s not the “Delta interview” an OTS or military candidate would receive. Again, this doesn’t make propel candidates bad or worthy of criticism themselves. It’s a good deal for them, a good deal that other peers don’t have.
#34
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 46
The fact that many at Delta still think the academy had anything to do with Comair the airline is pretty funny actually. Almost as funny as the NWA guys who had zero idea who was flying all those CRJ's in Detroit for them... perspective I guess.
#35
And yet it did.
You clearly got triggered by the "C word" which is another discussion entirely, but when Delta closed that academy it was owed by Delta and had nothing to do with Comair, and absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the Comair MEC.
The point of those mentioning it was to highlight how poorly and shortsighted prior management was to dealing with the slow motion developing pilot crunch that they had decades to see coming.
They bought two regionals for billions of dollars only to shut one down and sell the other for dimes on the dollar (about 300M) to a competing regional under duress for unbelieveably bad terms.
The subsequent selling of a robust and successful flight training academy, and then doing nothing to reestablish one for over 2 decades, is the ironical reference many are making. That had absolutely nothing to do with what you were upset by.
You clearly got triggered by the "C word" which is another discussion entirely, but when Delta closed that academy it was owed by Delta and had nothing to do with Comair, and absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the Comair MEC.
The point of those mentioning it was to highlight how poorly and shortsighted prior management was to dealing with the slow motion developing pilot crunch that they had decades to see coming.
They bought two regionals for billions of dollars only to shut one down and sell the other for dimes on the dollar (about 300M) to a competing regional under duress for unbelieveably bad terms.
The subsequent selling of a robust and successful flight training academy, and then doing nothing to reestablish one for over 2 decades, is the ironical reference many are making. That had absolutely nothing to do with what you were upset by.
#36
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2021
Posts: 1,121
The biggest hurdle is they have to pass their regional initial training LIKE EVERYONE ELSE. Most don’t even upgrade. I think you have to pass upgrade to flow. That’s why it takes longer to flow.
They shouldn’t have to wait for flows, we shouldn’t even have flow. We shouldn’t have Endeavor because Delta flying should be done by Delta pilots.
Propel is a joke designed to get the children of Delta pilots in the easy way and so is the Endeavor flow. Why are we arguing over the legitimacy of these joke programs anyway.
Last edited by LAXtoDEN; 03-24-2023 at 07:59 PM.
#37
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 769
I think frontier has a program in which they hire kids and put them into the right seat of the 320 directly after they achieve their 1500 hours instructing in a 172 , Cherokee or whatever they are instructing in . I think Frontier’s reasoning is that it’s actually harder to fly the RJ9 than the 320 ,so might as well just bring the pilots on as soon as they get their 1500 hours. Delta could probably do that with propels and just throw them on the 717, 220, or 320 right out of instructing . It seems to work at Frontier and no one has bent any metal yet . Would it be fair to Endeavor pilots ? Of course not. Would it be the safest thing to do ? Probably no less safe than jumping into the right seat of an RJ9 with 1500 hours in a 172. I think the way the program is now is that Delta secretly ( so nobody knows who they are) sends the propels to Endeavor for a year or so to get their experience and then they cut over to Delta ahead of the majority of Endeavor seniority list.
#38
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 769
The Delta Propel interview is similar to an interview at your nearest Burger King. You sit down at a table and have a normal conversation with a pilot recruiter for about 30 mins. It specifically benefits the candidates who are dumb as rocks as they’d never get through upgrade training at a regional let alone the assessment Delta currently sends their potential candidates.
The biggest hurdle is they have to pass their regional initial training LIKE EVERYONE ELSE. Most don’t even upgrade. I think you have to pass upgrade to flow. That’s why it takes longer to flow.
They shouldn’t have to wait for flows, we shouldn’t even have flow. We shouldn’t have Endeavor because Delta flying should be done by Delta pilots.
Propel is a joke designed to get the children of Delta pilots in the easy way and so is the Endeavor flow. Why are we arguing over the legitimacy of these joke programs anyway.
The biggest hurdle is they have to pass their regional initial training LIKE EVERYONE ELSE. Most don’t even upgrade. I think you have to pass upgrade to flow. That’s why it takes longer to flow.
They shouldn’t have to wait for flows, we shouldn’t even have flow. We shouldn’t have Endeavor because Delta flying should be done by Delta pilots.
Propel is a joke designed to get the children of Delta pilots in the easy way and so is the Endeavor flow. Why are we arguing over the legitimacy of these joke programs anyway.
#39
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 598
The Endeavor flow is not an”easy” way to get to Delta , LOL. So you are telling me that spending 20 to 30 years flying Metros, Fokkers, Dash 8’s, Saabs, 4 engine Jet AVRO’s , RJ 200’s, 700’s and 900’s with 30,000 hours is an “easy” way to get to Delta? You been breathing in too much smoke from the peace pipe, LOL. Now I realize as time goes by that the pilots on the flow get more junior ,but they still spent their dues flying wholly owned metal , flying Delta passengers and being payed by Delta. There is no comparison from the flow to propel . I agree with the decree of Jason Ambrosi. Time will tell if that will ever happen but the last few years have certainly eroded the old regional model to near extinction.
Just because you turned it down doesn't mean it's bad.
Congrats on your 30,000 hours at the commuters. However, I don't think most of us see that as the badge of honor that you think it is.
#40
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: everywhere but nowhere
Posts: 417
The Delta Propel interview is similar to an interview at your nearest Burger King. You sit down at a table and have a normal conversation with a pilot recruiter for about 30 mins. It specifically benefits the candidates who are dumb as rocks as they’d never get through upgrade training at a regional let alone the assessment Delta currently sends their potential candidates.
The biggest hurdle is they have to pass their regional initial training LIKE EVERYONE ELSE. Most don’t even upgrade. I think you have to pass upgrade to flow. That’s why it takes longer to flow.
They shouldn’t have to wait for flows, we shouldn’t even have flow. We shouldn’t have Endeavor because Delta flying should be done by Delta pilots.
Propel is a joke designed to get the children of Delta pilots in the easy way and so is the Endeavor flow. Why are we arguing over the legitimacy of these joke programs anyway.
The biggest hurdle is they have to pass their regional initial training LIKE EVERYONE ELSE. Most don’t even upgrade. I think you have to pass upgrade to flow. That’s why it takes longer to flow.
They shouldn’t have to wait for flows, we shouldn’t even have flow. We shouldn’t have Endeavor because Delta flying should be done by Delta pilots.
Propel is a joke designed to get the children of Delta pilots in the easy way and so is the Endeavor flow. Why are we arguing over the legitimacy of these joke programs anyway.
Propel isn't the easiest way to Delta and the scrutiny they are under for much longer than just about anyone else hired OTS proves that.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post