Search

Notices

Upcoming Bases

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-01-2023 | 11:47 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,563
Likes: 107
From: Road construction signholder
Default

Originally Posted by Tinpusher007
DFW was larger than ATL???
No, DFW was not larger than ATL post 9/11. That may be one of the single dumbest things I've ever read here. I mean, did that statement just manifest itself out of the ether? The rest of the rant/post wasn't much better or more factual either.
Reply
Old 05-01-2023 | 02:33 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: :)
Default

Originally Posted by Tinpusher007
DFW was larger than ATL???
I meant pre-911, I don't have the exact numbers.
Reply
Old 05-01-2023 | 02:44 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: :)
Default

Originally Posted by TED74
Laughable. I wish I could get “punished” more often for things that are good for the pilot group!

If a new base is cost-effective (or more accurately they BELIEVE it will be), they’ll open it in a heartbeat. Ain’t no pilot antagonist trying to punish pilots, as much as management does indeed despise our membership.
Disagree, the past four years taught me they will go out of their way to push pilots around, even lose money in the process. The big fake displacement that abrogated seniority for thousands, UNA, whats a sill, MD before VEOP, pre-signing extensions at the gate on the first leg, flying empty redeyes around the system for a year, no coffee on board due to covid; that's just naming a few. They are clutching to a leadership style (fear and intimidation) that worked for one generation and is failing miserably with X, Y and Z. Why else do you think we have an additional 1000 pilots, yet we cannot even fly 2019 block hours? NPS is in the toilet. Lastly, our competitors have opened bases in quite a few places where we were the dominant carrier, so it ain't economics- at least not RASM economics.
Reply
Old 05-01-2023 | 02:58 PM
  #24  
FangsF15's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,354
Likes: 1,375
Default

Originally Posted by CX500T
Honest question: Why does ATL get 2x the MEC votes, I assume it's because it's the largest base, but where is the line drawn?

If NYC was 2,500 pilots and ATL 4,500 and new base X (BOS) is 500 pilots, NYC is far closer to ATL in size but gets the same votes as BOS, CVG, BFE, etc. At what point does ATL "lose" the 2nd set of reps, or how big does NYC have to grow to get a second set.

It's probably buried somewhere in the contract or ALPA policy manual but I am on the road (non work) and don't have my tablet with all the easily searchble stuff.
Over a third of the airline is based in ATL, yet they have less than 25% of the total voting reps. NYC is next biggest, and is barely half the size of ATL. Further, MSP, SLC, LAX, & SEA are less than 25% the size of ATL, yet get 50% of the representatives. IOW, each ATL rep actually have to represent, and be responsive to, 2x as many pilots as those 4 bases.

If anything, ATL needs MORE voting reps, not less.

Besides, when it comes down to a “roll call” vote, which any rep can call, it comes down to the number of constituents anyway.

Last edited by FangsF15; 05-01-2023 at 03:08 PM.
Reply
Old 05-01-2023 | 03:09 PM
  #25  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 16
Default

Originally Posted by CX500T
Honest question: Why does ATL get 2x the MEC votes, I assume it's because it's the largest base, but where is the line drawn?

If NYC was 2,500 pilots and ATL 4,500 and new base X (BOS) is 500 pilots, NYC is far closer to ATL in size but gets the same votes as BOS, CVG, BFE, etc. At what point does ATL "lose" the 2nd set of reps, or how big does NYC have to grow to get a second set.

It's probably buried somewhere in the contract or ALPA policy manual but I am on the road (non work) and don't have my tablet with all the easily searchble stuff.
It’s in the ALPA Constitution and Bylaws. If a council has more than 1000 members and is more than 25% of the airline they get two status reps for each category. Same would apply if more than 500 members and 50%.
Reply
Old 05-01-2023 | 03:26 PM
  #26  
NuGuy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,107
Likes: 103
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr
No, DFW was not larger than ATL post 9/11. That may be one of the single dumbest things I've ever read here. I mean, did that statement just manifest itself out of the ether? The rest of the rant/post wasn't much better or more factual either.
Plus I can think of at least 3 other elections for MEC chair that was decided by one vote, so that’s hardly any kind of indicator.
Reply
Old 05-01-2023 | 05:30 PM
  #27  
Can’t find crew pickup
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,066
Likes: 210
Default

Originally Posted by threeighteen
Actually it’s because they can’t get guys to upgrade to the left seat in their HCOL coastal bases so they opened up two new bases in LCOL areas with favorable taxes to incentivize people to upgrade.

But it is working as an applicant grab too, just look at the recent DL vs UA thread. The only reason that dude is considering UA over DL is the MCO base.
Favorable taxes, sure. But have you actually looked at the cost of living in those areas? And not just anywhere, but nicer neighborhoods with an easier drive to the airport? Not as cheap as you think.
Reply
Old 05-01-2023 | 05:49 PM
  #28  
Tinpusher007's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,808
Likes: 27
From: 330 B
Default

Originally Posted by JustNarced
I meant pre-911, I don't have the exact numbers.
Granted, I wasn't on property yet and I don't have any numbers myself but I am still skeptical that any pilot base was ever larger than Mecca.
Reply
Old 05-02-2023 | 11:11 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 5,578
Likes: 237
From: UNA
Default

Originally Posted by Tinpusher007
Granted, I wasn't on property yet and I don't have any numbers myself but I am still skeptical that any pilot base was ever larger than Mecca.
I doubt it was larger than ATL like the poster claimed, but I think it was bigger than CVG. So the fact they closed DFW but left CVG as a skeleton would give credit to the idea that there were other reasons at play
Reply
Old 05-02-2023 | 06:08 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: :)
Default

Originally Posted by Gone Flying
I doubt it was larger than ATL like the poster claimed, but I think it was bigger than CVG. So the fact they closed DFW but left CVG as a skeleton would give credit to the idea that there were other reasons at play
DAL's operation at DFW peaked at 35% of total airport traffic, just a hair under AAL when you consider there were other carriers; by 2004 it was down to 16%. When DFW was big, DAL in ATL was only A and B Concourse, and half of T or E (international moved from T to E). My point, they closed a major mid-country base to toss an MEC Chairman. Ask some of the saltier SLC pilots about DAL threatening to close SLC as well if the LEC didn't get onboard with concessions or the BK itself. The result of these actions and threats? The pilots VOTED YES to terminate their DB plan, that saved the company tens of billions going forward. You need an MEC Chair and a fearful LEC to pull off a stunt like that.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
H60 DUSTOFF
JetBlue
1590
07-01-2022 03:10 PM
Shammy
United
116
12-17-2021 06:26 PM
jamin35008
Regional
15
06-01-2008 07:39 PM
fit29
Piedmont Airlines
5
04-22-2008 01:21 PM
johnson48
Fractional
20
04-15-2008 02:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices