International Diversions
#41
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: Looking left
Posts: 3,263
It seems with some of our already-ordered A350's that we are going to a more-premium seating arrangement with fewer total seats. It doesn't say specifically but those are being put on super-long routes like JNB that are almost always payload optimized so it seems like someone in management figured out it's better to sell more premium seats and be able to fly a full airplane than constantly leave with dozens of unfilled main cabin seats. I wonder if there will be a move to do something similar on 321's and 737 Max 10's.
#42
Roll’n Thunder
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: Pilot
Posts: 3,570
#43
#44
The problem at a non customs airport is you can't deplane. You can state it's the companies problem but you are stuck on the aircraft with the passengers. Off a long international flight you will likely be out of water and lav tanks full. You might face a APU shutdown if low on fuel depending on the aircraft type. In a different situation I once spent 8 hours onboard with the passengers after landing. I can assure you it was a problem. The company will work hard to get a new crew in to fly to a customs airport or bring a customs team to that airport but it will be a long wait.
Overall this sounds like a challenging diversion situation inflamed by having a high mins Captain operating into an area of the country that had a significant amount of airports with a couple hundred miles at near CAT III mins
#45
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,110
All this is elatively minor compared to being on emergency fuel after you go around at a further out "customs capable" airport.
Overall this sounds like a challenging diversion situation inflamed by having a high mins Captain operating into an area of the country that had a significant amount of airports with a couple hundred miles at near CAT III mins
Overall this sounds like a challenging diversion situation inflamed by having a high mins Captain operating into an area of the country that had a significant amount of airports with a couple hundred miles at near CAT III mins
If CATIII’s are getting in and my jet is capable, I’m strongly considering emergency authority to land vs divert to non customs airport if that’s the only option and ASAPing it.
I don’t know the whole story though.
#46
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,007
And this is why “high mins” is so ridiculous. Here we have a new Captain that could have gotten in just fine, and bc they’re on high mins are now forced into a situation that is taxing on an experienced CA let alone a brand new one. Both times I’ve been on high mins I had to use 5549 to do a CAT II to an auto land. Each time I considered and briefed using Emergency Authority to do a CAT III to an auto land if warranted(one time I had an ALT and one time I did not bc of unforecast weather).
If CATIII’s are getting in and my jet is capable, I’m strongly considering emergency authority to land vs divert to non customs airport if that’s the only option and ASAPing it.
I don’t know the whole story though.
If CATIII’s are getting in and my jet is capable, I’m strongly considering emergency authority to land vs divert to non customs airport if that’s the only option and ASAPing it.
I don’t know the whole story though.
#47
Super Moderator
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,875
And this is why “high mins” is so ridiculous. Here we have a new Captain that could have gotten in just fine, and bc they’re on high mins are now forced into a situation that is taxing on an experienced CA let alone a brand new one. Both times I’ve been on high mins I had to use 5549 to do a CAT II to an auto land. Each time I considered and briefed using Emergency Authority to do a CAT III to an auto land if warranted(one time I had an ALT and one time I did not bc of unforecast weather).
If CATIII’s are getting in and my jet is capable, I’m strongly considering emergency authority to land vs divert to non customs airport if that’s the only option and ASAPing it.
I don’t know the whole story though.
If CATIII’s are getting in and my jet is capable, I’m strongly considering emergency authority to land vs divert to non customs airport if that’s the only option and ASAPing it.
I don’t know the whole story though.
All in all they safely landed in what must have been a stressful divert - good job. Sometimes we are victims of our success, air travel is so safe and routine people get upset at any deviation from a perfect experience.
Scoop
#48
I was thinking the same exact thing - High mins definitely can create issues - not sure it actually solves any. Also I forgot does the dispatcher automatically know if a Pilot is high mins or does the Pilot need to contact dispatch? If so this can easily lead to issues if the weather is forecast good many would not contact the dispatcher prior to departure and if the wx goes to CAT III unexpectedly we get last minute diversions to airports that provide minimal service.
All in all they safely landed in what must have been a stressful divert - good job. Sometimes we are victims of our success, air travel is so safe and routine people get upset at any deviation from a perfect experience.
Scoop
All in all they safely landed in what must have been a stressful divert - good job. Sometimes we are victims of our success, air travel is so safe and routine people get upset at any deviation from a perfect experience.
Scoop
Totally agree with all y'all. It's silly, especially for Captains with FO time in type. Granted, you can reduce the 100 hour req by 1 hour for each landing up to 50, but how does moving 6' left honestly change things so much we (or more accuratly the FAA) drive ourselves into a worse problem. It's losing the forest for the trees.
#49
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Gramercy Riffs
Posts: 496
If you have time in any control seat of a type it counts towards high mins, ie if you ever were an FO on the 330 and had more than 100 hours doing it then you will not be on high mins if you go to the left seat. That's the way it has been interpreted by DAL dispatchers and (some) instructors I've asked. I'm not saying it's the correct interpretation but it allowed me (per dispatch) to do a no-kidding cat III into LAX one night on my second landing off OE. The dispatcher, when asked via Atlanta radio on the way there told me that since I had time as an FO on the same type (m88 vs 717, 20+ years ago) I was good to go.
I'm curious as to the real legality of this. Either way we (auto) landed fine and the statute of limitations has expired.
This is moot in the case of DAL21 anyway, the A was never a B on the plane.
I'm curious as to the real legality of this. Either way we (auto) landed fine and the statute of limitations has expired.
This is moot in the case of DAL21 anyway, the A was never a B on the plane.
#50
Yakima Police Department
·
TEAMWORK SAVES THE DAY
Last night (just after 8 pm) Yakima Police were notified that an international Delta Flight from London was being diverted to the Yakima airport due to weather conditions in Seattle. There were 166 passengers and 13 crew members and all landed safely. HOWEVER, the Yakima Airport does not have Customs or Immigration Officers on site to process passengers coming off the plane. This meant that either the tired travelers would have to stay on the plane or squeeze into our small terminal.
But after a few calls help rapidly responded! Local Homeland Security Agents, Airport Director Robert Hodgman, airport staff, and eventually 8 Customs agents and 1 K-9 came to the rescue to assist YPD. A quick call for hot pizza was initiated so that we could welcome our international guests to Yakima. Delta sent a “rescue” plane to ferry the passengers to Seattle early this morning.
Although it was probably a nightmare for travelers, team Yakima and our federal partners stepped up and got the job done with speed, efficiency, and kindness.
https://www.facebook.com/YakimaPoliceDepartment/
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post