Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Who Are These Kooks?  Is This For Real? >

Who Are These Kooks? Is This For Real?

Search
Notices

Who Are These Kooks? Is This For Real?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-12-2024, 07:24 PM
  #101  
Roll’n Thunder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: Pilot
Posts: 3,610
Default

Originally Posted by Meme In Command View Post
They're all playing chicken with the company thinking they'll be the ones to finally get a bypass and immediately using 11.G.7 when they realize the company is actually gonna make them train.
The smarter play is to wait until the day before you start training to exercise that provision.
tennisguru is offline  
Old 01-12-2024, 07:38 PM
  #102  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Position: Aspiring Airline Pilot
Posts: 43
Default

Originally Posted by chrisreedrules View Post
67 ain’t happening. Even if the FAA Reauthorization Bill includes it, the individual unions at each airline can shoot it down via several mechanisms. These pro-67 guys are essentially peeing into the wind.


Dude: Are you really that dumb? Federal law trumps union contracts 3very time.
Chico is offline  
Old 01-12-2024, 08:07 PM
  #103  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,466
Default

Originally Posted by chrisreedrules View Post
67 ain’t happening. Even if the FAA Reauthorization Bill includes it, the individual unions at each airline can shoot it down via several mechanisms. These pro-67 guys are essentially peeing into the wind.
Just to keep this rational... federal age discrimination law would 100% prevent any company or union restrictions based on (old) age.

Only federal law (or the constitution) can supersede federal law.

If you hate 67, don't rely on your union to fix it after it passes.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 01-12-2024, 08:17 PM
  #104  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Petting Zoo
Posts: 2,077
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Just to keep this rational... federal age discrimination law would 100% prevent any company or union restrictions based on (old) age.

Only federal law (or the constitution) can supersede federal.
Then how does Netjets have age 70?
Sputnik is online now  
Old 01-12-2024, 08:47 PM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,456
Default

Originally Posted by Sputnik View Post
Then how does Netjets have age 70?
because federal law specifically allows it in their case.

https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-n...ge-91k-135-ops
Gone Flying is online now  
Old 01-13-2024, 05:35 AM
  #106  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,008
Default

Dear Hon Senator Snort,

Congratulations on your 82nd birthday.

We will keep this simple. We want to pay taxes until we die.

We are offering to surrender the benefits we have earned to the good of the general Treasury. Last we saw you had spent $4 trillion that you don't have. Let our employers help you out with that.

Sincerely,

Bob
Libertarian, President, Chairman, Grand Potentiate & Captain of the Fly till we Die Committee, LLC
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 01-13-2024, 05:38 AM
  #107  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,008
Default

Originally Posted by Sputnik View Post
Then how does Netjets have age 70?
and so it begins :-)

Why limit it at 67?
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 01-13-2024, 05:42 AM
  #108  
Bus driver
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 832
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
and so it begins :-)

Why limit it at 67?
Indeed. Benefit from retirement age for the bulk of your career, crickets. Time to retire, fly til ya die!
Tanker1497 is offline  
Old 01-13-2024, 05:52 AM
  #109  
Gets Weekends Off
 
chrisreedrules's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 4,599
Default

Originally Posted by Chico View Post
Dude: Are you really that dumb? Federal law trumps union contracts 3very time.
Canada is a wonderful case study. There is no mandatory retirement age for Canadian airline pilots. However due to ICAO, some Canadian carriers have a requirement to retire at 65 and even 67. And some can fly beyond that, just not in international or U.S. airspace.

Canada has also already indicated in no uncertain terms that if the FAA increases the mandatory retirement age from 65 to 67 that U.S. pilots WILL NOT be able to fly in Canadian airspace as this would be a violation of ICAO. Sssoooo that means that airlines would have to plan around pilots/routes that encroach on Canadian airspace (DTW approaches etc). We don’t even have certainty that 65+ pilots would be able to fly to Hawaii because that is through ICAO airspace.

This whole thing is an absolute cluster ******* in the making and the pro 67 crowd knows it and are full steam ahead regardless. Unreal.
chrisreedrules is offline  
Old 01-13-2024, 06:09 AM
  #110  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Posts: 116
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf View Post
Wow, there are quite a few names on there that I didn't think would be. Most of those guys are WB As, and went through the bankruptcies. And were then responsible for ALPA leadership in the ensuing contracts that failed to get them a retirement benefit to thier liking. So the motivation makes sense. Last gasp desperate attempt.
And then there’s the 45 year old recently former MEC Chairman….
Red Swingline is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices