Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Who Are These Kooks?  Is This For Real? >

Who Are These Kooks? Is This For Real?


Notices

Who Are These Kooks? Is This For Real?

Old 01-12-2024 | 07:24 PM
  #101  
Roll’n Thunder
Community Influencer
15 Years
On Reserve
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,148
Likes: 561
From: Pilot
Default

Originally Posted by Meme In Command
They're all playing chicken with the company thinking they'll be the ones to finally get a bypass and immediately using 11.G.7 when they realize the company is actually gonna make them train.
The smarter play is to wait until the day before you start training to exercise that provision.
Reply
Old 01-12-2024 | 07:38 PM
  #102  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Aspiring Airline Pilot
Default

Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
67 ain’t happening. Even if the FAA Reauthorization Bill includes it, the individual unions at each airline can shoot it down via several mechanisms. These pro-67 guys are essentially peeing into the wind.


Dude: Are you really that dumb? Federal law trumps union contracts 3very time.
Reply
Old 01-12-2024 | 08:07 PM
  #103  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,107
Likes: 793
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
67 ain’t happening. Even if the FAA Reauthorization Bill includes it, the individual unions at each airline can shoot it down via several mechanisms. These pro-67 guys are essentially peeing into the wind.
Just to keep this rational... federal age discrimination law would 100% prevent any company or union restrictions based on (old) age.

Only federal law (or the constitution) can supersede federal law.

If you hate 67, don't rely on your union to fix it after it passes.
Reply
Old 01-12-2024 | 08:17 PM
  #104  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,199
Likes: 13
From: Petting Zoo
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Just to keep this rational... federal age discrimination law would 100% prevent any company or union restrictions based on (old) age.

Only federal law (or the constitution) can supersede federal.
Then how does Netjets have age 70?
Reply
Old 01-12-2024 | 08:47 PM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 5,550
Likes: 217
From: UNA
Default

Originally Posted by Sputnik
Then how does Netjets have age 70?
because federal law specifically allows it in their case.

https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-n...ge-91k-135-ops
Reply
Old 01-13-2024 | 05:35 AM
  #106  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Dear Hon Senator Snort,

Congratulations on your 82nd birthday.

We will keep this simple. We want to pay taxes until we die.

We are offering to surrender the benefits we have earned to the good of the general Treasury. Last we saw you had spent $4 trillion that you don't have. Let our employers help you out with that.

Sincerely,

Bob
Libertarian, President, Chairman, Grand Potentiate & Captain of the Fly till we Die Committee, LLC
Reply
Old 01-13-2024 | 05:38 AM
  #107  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by Sputnik
Then how does Netjets have age 70?
and so it begins :-)

Why limit it at 67?
Reply
Old 01-13-2024 | 05:42 AM
  #108  
Bus driver
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 899
Likes: 10
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
and so it begins :-)

Why limit it at 67?
Indeed. Benefit from retirement age for the bulk of your career, crickets. Time to retire, fly til ya die!
Reply
Old 01-13-2024 | 05:52 AM
  #109  
chrisreedrules's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,601
Likes: 0
From: CRJ FO
Default

Originally Posted by Chico
Dude: Are you really that dumb? Federal law trumps union contracts 3very time.
Canada is a wonderful case study. There is no mandatory retirement age for Canadian airline pilots. However due to ICAO, some Canadian carriers have a requirement to retire at 65 and even 67. And some can fly beyond that, just not in international or U.S. airspace.

Canada has also already indicated in no uncertain terms that if the FAA increases the mandatory retirement age from 65 to 67 that U.S. pilots WILL NOT be able to fly in Canadian airspace as this would be a violation of ICAO. Sssoooo that means that airlines would have to plan around pilots/routes that encroach on Canadian airspace (DTW approaches etc). We don’t even have certainty that 65+ pilots would be able to fly to Hawaii because that is through ICAO airspace.

This whole thing is an absolute cluster ******* in the making and the pro 67 crowd knows it and are full steam ahead regardless. Unreal.
Reply
Old 01-13-2024 | 06:09 AM
  #110  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 136
Likes: 21
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
Wow, there are quite a few names on there that I didn't think would be. Most of those guys are WB As, and went through the bankruptcies. And were then responsible for ALPA leadership in the ensuing contracts that failed to get them a retirement benefit to thier liking. So the motivation makes sense. Last gasp desperate attempt.
And then there’s the 45 year old recently former MEC Chairman….
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices